Short Latency Effects of Auditory Frequency Change on Human Motor Behavior

References

• Ammirante, P., & Thompson, W. F. (2012). Continuation tapping to triggered melodies: Motor resonance effects of melodic motion. Experimental Brain Research, 216, 51–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammirante, P., Thompson, W. F., & Russo, F. (2011). Ideomotor effects of pitch on continuation tapping. The Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(2), 381–393.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. A., & Malmierca, M. S. (2013). The effect of auditory cortex deactivation on stimulus‐specific adaptation in the inferior colliculus of the rat. European Journal of Neuroscience, 37(1), 52–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antunes, F. M., & Malmierca, M. S. (2011). Effect of auditory cortex deactivation on stimulus-specific adaptation in the medial geniculate body. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(47), 17306–17316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlinger, S., & Jerlvall, L. (1981). Early auditory electric responses to fast amplitude and frequency tone glides. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 51(6), 624–631.
   Google Scholar
• Ausmus, D. M., & Clarke, J. A. (2014). Mother knows best: Functionally referential alarm calling in white-tailed ptarmigan. Animal Cognition, 17, 671–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, R., Reed, D. K., Tóth, B., Best, V., Majdak, P., Colburn, H. S., & Shinn-Cunningham, B. (2017). Asymmetries in behavioral and neural responses to spectral cues demonstrate the generality of auditory looming bias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(36), 9743–9748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBC Earth. (n.d.). Drongo bird tricks meerkats. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEYCjJqr21A
   Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57, 289–300. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2346101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Białuńska, A., Dalla Bella, S., & Jaśkowski, P. (2011). Increasing stimulus intensity does not affect sensorimotor synchronization. Psychological Research, 75, 43–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boasson, A. D., & Granot, R. (2012, July 23–28). Melodic direction’s effect on tapping. In E. Cambouropoulos, C. Tsougras, P. Mavromatis, & K. Pastiadis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (ICMPC) and the 8th Triennial Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (pp. 110–119). Thessaloniki, Greece. Retrieved from http://icmpc-escom2012.web.auth.gr/files/papers/110_Proc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boltz, M. G. (2011). Illusory tempo changes due to musical characteristics. Music Perception, 28(4), 367–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciaglia, R., Escera, C., Slabu, L., Grimm, S., Sanjuán, A., Ventura-Campos, N., & Ávila, C. (2015). Involvement of the human midbrain and thalamus in auditory deviance detection. Neuropsychologia, 68, 51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clément, S., Demany, L., & Semal, C. (1999). Memory for pitch versus memory for loudness. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(5), 2805–2811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornella, M., Leung, S., Grimm, S., & Escera, C. (2013). Regularity encoding and deviance detection of frequency modulated sweeps: Human middle-and long-latency auditory evoked potentials. Psychophysiology, 50(12), 1275–1281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousineau, M., Demany, L., & Pressnitzer, D. (2009). What makes a melody: The perceptual singularity of pitch sequences. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(6), 3179–3187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demany, L., Carcagno, S., & Semal, C. (2013). The perceptual enhancement of tones by frequency shifts. Hearing Research, 298, 10–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demany, L., & Ramos, C. (2005). On the binding of successive sounds: Perceiving shifts in nonperceived pitches. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117(2), 833–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demany, L., & Semal, C. (2018). Automatic frequency-shift detection in the auditory system: A review of psychophysical findings. Neuroscience, 389, 30–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiGiovanni, J. J., & Schlauch, R. S. (2007). Mechanisms responsible for differences in perceived duration for rising-intensity and falling-intensity sounds. Ecological Psychology, 19(3), 239–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duque, D., Wang, X., Nieto-Diego, J., Krumbholz, K., & Malmierca, M. S. (2016). Neurons in the inferior colliculus of the rat show stimulus-specific adaptation for frequency, but not for intensity. Scientific Reports, 6, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escera, C., & Malmierca, M. S. (2014). The auditory novelty system: An attempt to integrate human and animal research. Psychophysiology, 51(2), 111–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernald, A. (1992a). Human maternal vocalizations to infants as biologically relevant signals: An evolutionary perspective. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 391–428). NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernald, A. (1992b). Meaningful melodies in mothers’ speech to infants. In H. Papoušek, U. Jürgens, & M. Papoušek (Eds.), Nonverbal vocal communication: Comparative and developmental approaches (pp. 262–282). NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freiberg, K., Tually, K., & Crassini, B. (2001). Use of an auditory looming task to test infants’ sensitivity to sound pressure level as an auditory distance cue. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19(1), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, G. C., Chae, B. C., Cooper, J. R., Gindi, M. M., Ho, T. N., Kim, B. S., … Lunde, S. E. (2000). Brainstem frequency-following response and simple motor reaction time. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 36(1), 35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, G. C., Gutterson, R. P., Levy, D. S., Mussey, J. L., Sabatasso, F. A., & Wasserman, R. I. (2004). Correlated brain stem and cortical evoked responses to auditory tone change. Neuroreport, 15(17), 2613–2616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazanfar, A. A., & Maier, J. X. (2009). Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) hear rising frequency sounds as looming. Behavioral Neuroscience, 123(4), 822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giard, M. H., Lavikahen, J., Reinikainen, K., Perrin, F., Bertrand, O., Pernier, J., & Näätänen, R. (1995). Separate representation of stimulus frequency, intensity, and duration in auditory sensory memory: An event-related potential and dipole-model analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(2), 133–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, M., & O’neill, W. E. (2000). An extralemniscal component of the mustached bat inferior colliculus selective for direction and rate of linear frequency modulations. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 426, 165–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieser, D. L., & Kuhl, P. K. (1988). Maternal speech to infants in a tonal language: Support for universal prosodic features in motherese. Developmental Psychology, 24(1), 14–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, S., & Escera, C. (2012). Auditory deviance detection revisited: Evidence for a hierarchical novelty system. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 85(1), 88–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, S., Escera, C., & Nelken, I. (2016). Early indices of deviance detection in humans and animal models. Biological Psychology, 116, 23–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haff, T. M., & Magrath, R. D. (2013). Eavesdropping on the neighbours: Fledglings learn to respond to heterospecific alarm calls. Animal Behaviour, 85, 411–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hage, S. R., Jiang, T., Berquist, S. W., Feng, J., & Metzner, W. (2013). Ambient noise induces independent shifts in call frequency and amplitude within the Lombard effect in echolocating bats. PNAS, 110(10), 4063–4068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hage, S. R., Jürgens, U., & Ehret, G. (2006). Audio-vocal interaction in the pontine brainstem during self-initiated vocalization in the squirrel monkey. European Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 3297–3308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hentchke, H. (2011/2015). Measures of effect size toolbox (mes.m). Matlab central file exchange. Retrieved from http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/32398-measures-of-effect-size-toolbox/content/mes.m
   Google Scholar
• Horstmann, G. (2006). Latency and duration of the action interruption in surprise. Cognition & Emotion, 20(2), 242–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. B. (1973). The effects of insular and temporal lesions in cats on two types of auditory pattern discrimination. Brain Research, 62(1), 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, M., Lifshitz, K., & Litchfield, D. (1978). Averaged evoked potentials and frequency modulation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 45(2), 236–243.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, M., Lifshitz, K., & Litchfield, D. (1980). Average evoked potentials and amplitude modulation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 50(1), 134–140.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, A., & Parkinson, J. (2000). Human frequency-following response: Representation of tonal sweeps. Audiology and Neurotology, 5(6), 312–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, A., Xu, Y., Gandour, J. T., & Cariani, P. A. (2004). Human frequency-following response: Representation of pitch contours in Chinese tones. Hearing Research, 189, 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, R. I., & Wu, G. K. (2012). The generation of direction selectivity in the auditory system. Neuron, 73(5), 1016–1027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, C. R., Sun, J., & Hain, T. C. (2007). Effects of simultaneous perturbations of voice pitch and loudness feedback on voice F0 and amplitude control. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(5), 2862–2872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, C., Earl, B., Thompson, I., Whitaker, K., Cahn, S., Xiang, J., … Zhang, F. (2016). Musicians are better than non-musicians in frequency change detection: Behavioral and electrophysio-logical evidence. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10. doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, J. X., & Ghazanfar, A. A. (2004, August). Auditory and multisensory perception of looming signals by rhesus monkeys: A naturalistic behaviour research. 5. Neurowissenschaftliche Nachwuchskonferenz Tübingen (NeNa’04). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-D87B-1
   Google Scholar
• Maiste, A., & Picton, T. (1989). Human auditory evoked potentials to frequency-modulated tones. Ear and Hearing, 10(3), 153–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmierca, M. S., Anderson, L. A., & Antunes, F. M. (2015). The cortical modulation of stimulus-specific adaptation in the auditory midbrain and thalamus: A potential neuronal correlate for predictive coding. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 9, 19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmierca, M. S., Niño-Aguillón, B. E., Nieto-Diego, J., Porteros, Á., Pérez-González, D., & Escera, C. (2019). Pattern-sensitive neurons reveal encoding of complex auditory regularities in the rat inferior colliculus. NeuroImage, 184, 889–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manser, M. B., Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2002). Suricate alarm calls signal predator class and urgency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(2), 55–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, M. V., Pierce, J. R., Reeves, A., & Roberts, L. A. (1988). Theoretical and experimental explorations of the Bohlen–Pierce scale. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84(4), 1214–1222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBeath, M. K., & Neuhoff, J. G. (2002). The Doppler effect is not what you think it is: Dramatic pitch change due to dynamic intensity change. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(2), 306–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. T., Miller, J., Gil-da-Costa, R., & Hauser, M. D. (2001). Selective phonotaxis by cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Behaviour, 138, 811–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, E. S. (1977). On the occurrence and significance of motivation-structural rules in some bird and animal sounds. The American Naturalist, 111(981), 855–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelken, I., & Versnel, H. (2000). Responses to linear and logarithmic frequency‐ modulated sweeps in ferret primary auditory cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 12(2), 549–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelken, I., Yaron, A., Polterovich, A., & Hershenhoren, I. (2013). Stimulus-specific adaptation beyond pure tones. In Basic aspects of hearing (pp. 411–418). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-1590-9_45
   Google Scholar
• Neuhoff, J. G. (2016). Looming sounds are perceived as faster than receding sounds. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(1), 15.
   Google Scholar
• Nissen, M. J. (1977). Stimulus intensity and information processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 22(4), 338–352.
   Google Scholar
• Noguchi, Y., Fujiwara, M., & Hamano, S. (2015). Temporal evolution of neural activity underlying auditory discrimination of frequency increase and decrease. Brain Topography, 28(3), 437–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohala, J. J. (1984). An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 of voice. Phonetica, 41, 1–16. Germany: Karger.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohl, F. W., Wetzel, W., Wagner, T., Rech, A., & Scheich, H. (1999). Bilateral ablation of auditory cortex in Mongolian gerbil affects discrimination of frequency modulated tones but not of pure tones. Learning & Memory, 6(4), 347–362. Retrieved from http://learnmem.cshlp.org/content/6/4/347.full.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo, P. J., Mäkelä, J. P., & Sams, M. (1999). Hemispheric differences in processing tone frequency and amplitude modulations. Neuroreport, 10(14), 3081–3086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo, P. J., & Sams, M. (1993). Human auditory cortex responses to rising versus falling glides. Neuroscience Letters, 159, 43–45. Elsevier Scientific Publishers Ireland Ltd.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, V., McArthur, G., & Thompson, W. F. (2010). Effect of deviance direction and calculation method on duration and frequency mismatch negativity (MMN). Neuroscience Letters, 482(1), 71–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, M. (1989). The relationship between variability of intertap intervals and interval duration. Psychological Research, 51, 38–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisanski, K., Cartei, V., McGettigan, C., Raine, J., & Reby, D. (2016). Review – Voice modulation: A window into the origins of human vocal control? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 304–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plack, C. J., & Carlyon, R. P. (1995). Loudness perception and intensity coding. In B. C. Moore (Ed.), Hearing (pp. 123–160). Academic Press. doi:10.1016/b978-012505626-7/50006-6
   Google Scholar
• Repp, B. (2005). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12(6), 969–992. [ See p.3, top right, for 1:1 tapping rate limits].
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruch, H., Zürcher, Y., & Burkart, J. M. (2018). The function and mechanism of vocal accommodation in humans and other primates. Biological Reviews, 93(2), 996–1013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruusuvirta, T. T., & Astikainen, P. (2012). Mismatch negativity of higher amplitude for melodic ascendance than descendance. Neuroreport, 23(4), 220–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. J. (1980, July 25). Female mate choice in a neotropical frog. Science, New Series, 209(4455), 523–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarinen, J., Paavilainen, P., Schröger, E., Tervaniemi, M., & Näätänen, R. (1992). Representation of abstract attributes of auditory stimuli in the human brain. NeuroReport, 3(12), 1149–1151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saenz, M., & Langers, D. R. (2014). Tonotopic mapping of human auditory cortex. Hearing Research, 307, 42–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiga, T., Althen, H., Cornella, M., Zarnowiec, K., Yabe, H., & Escera, C. (2015). Deviance-related responses along the auditory hierarchy: Combined FFR, MLR and MMN evidence. PloS One, 10(9), e0136794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slugocki, C., Bosnyak, D., & Trainor, L. J. (2017). Simultaneously-evoked auditory potentials (SEAP): A new method for concurrent measurement of cortical and subcortical auditory-evoked activity. Hearing Research, 345, 30–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spehar, B., & Kolesarić, V. (2010). The effects of stimulus context on components of simple reaction time. Review of Psychology, 17(1), 59–67. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/70662
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, S. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64(3), 153–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, Y., Mellert, V., Richter, U., Møller, H., Nielsen, L., Hellman, R., … Takeshima, H. (2003). Precise and full-range determination of two-dimensional equal loudness contours. Japan: Tohoku University. Retrieved from http://www.mp3-tech.org/programmer/docs/IS-01Y-E.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Väljamäe, A. (2009). Auditorily-induced illusory self-motion: A review. Brain Research Reviews, 61(2), 240–255.
   Google Scholar
• Van Belle, G. (2011). Sample size. In Statistical rules of thumb (Vol. 699). John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from https://www.stat.washington.edu/NRCSE/research/struts/chapter2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Verschuure, J., & Van Meeteren, A. A. (1975). The effect of intensity on pitch. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 32(1), 33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W. J., Tan, C. T., & Martin, B. A. (2013, June). Auditory evoked responses to a frequency glide following a static pure tone. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics ICA2013, 19(1), 050122. ASA.
   Google Scholar
• Zendel, R., Ross, B., & Fujioka, T. (2011). The effects of stimulus rate and tapping rate on tapping performance. Music Perception, 29(1), 65–78. University of California Press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar