References
- Cesario, J. (2014). Priming, replication, and the hardest science. Perspectives on Psychological Science , 9(1), 40–48.
- Collaboration, O. S. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science , 349(6251), aac4716.
- Franco, A. , Malhotra, N. , & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science , 345(6203), 1502–1505.
- Head, M. L. , Holman, L. , Lanfear, R. , Kahn, A. T. , & Jennions, M. D. (2015). The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science. PLoS Biology , 13(3), e1002106.
- John, L. K. , Loewenstein, G. , & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science , 23(5), 524–532.
- Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known. Personality and Social Psychology Review , 2(3), 196–217.
- Martin, G. N. , & Clarke, R. M. (2017). Are Psychology journals anti-replication? A snapshot of editorial practices. Frontiers in Psychology , 8, 523.
- Maxwell, S. E. , Lau, M. Y. , & Howard, G. S. (2015). Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean? The American Psychologist , 70(6), 487–498.
- Pashler, H. , & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). Editors’ introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence? Perspectives on Psychological Science , 7(6), 528–530.
- Ricker, J. (2002). New journal supports null hypothesis. Monitor on Psychology , 33(5), 17. http://www.apa.org/monitor/may02/newjournal
- Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin , 86(3), 638–641.
- Schooler, J. (2011). Unpublished results hide the decline effect. Nature , 470(7335), 437.
- Simmons, J. P. , Nelson, L. D. , & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science , 22(11), 1359–1366.