Assessing the Role of Stimulus Novelty in the Elicitation of the Pupillary Dilation Response to Irrelevant Sound

References

• Alho, K., Escera, C., & Schröger, E. (2003). Event-related brain potential indices of involuntary attention to auditory stimulus changes. In J. Polich (Ed.), Detection of change: Event-related potential and fMRI findings (pp. 23–40). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Allport, D. A. (1989). Visual attention. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 631–682). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banbury, S. P., Macken, W. J., Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (2001). Auditory distraction and short-term memory: Phenomena and practical implications. Human Factors, 43(1), 12–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, R. J. (1990). Scoring criteria for response latency and habituation in the electrodermal research: A study in the context of the orienting response. Psychophysiology, 27(1), 94–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, R. J., Steiner, G. Z., De Blasio, F. M., Fogarty, J. S., Karamacoska, D., & MacDonald, B. (2020). Components in the P300: Don’t forget the Novelty P3! Psychophysiology, 57(7), e13371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendixen, A., Roeber, U., & Schröger, E. (2007). Regularity extraction and application in dynamic auditory stimulus sequences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(10), 1664–1677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berridge, C. W., & Waterhouse, B. D. (2003). The locus coeruleus-noradrenergic system: Modulation of behavioral state and state-dependent cognitive processes. Brain Research Reviews, 42(1), 33–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corbetta, M., Patel, G., & Shulman, G. L. (2008). The reorienting system of the human brain: From environment to theory of mind. Neuron, 58(3), 306–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coull, J. T., Büchel, C., Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. D. (1999). Noradrenergically mediated plasticity in a human attentional neuronal network. NeuroImage, 10(6), 705–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dehais, F., Causse, M., & Pastor, J. (2008). Embedded eye tracker in a real aircraft: New perspectives on pilot/aircraft interaction monitoring. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Research in Air Transportation (pp. 303–309). Fairfax, VA: Federal Aviation Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(5), 590–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foote, S. L., & Morrison, J. H. (1987). Extrathalamic modulation of cortical function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 10(1), 67–95.
   Google Scholar
• Gati, I., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1990). Novelty and significance in orientation and habituation: A feature-matching approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 119(3), 251–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horváth, J., & Winkler, I. (2004). How the human auditory system treats repetition amongst change. Neuroscience Letters, 368(2), 157–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. W., Hurlstone, M. J., Marsh, J. E., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2013). Cognitive control of auditory distraction: Impact of task difficulty, foreknowledge, and working memory capacity supports duplex-mechanism account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 539–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (2003). Indispensable benefits and unavoidable costs of unattended sound for cognitive functioning. Noise & Health, 6, 63–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hughes, R. W., & Marsh, J. E. (2017). The functional determinants of short-term memory: Evidence from perceptual-motor interference in verbal serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 537–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2005). Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: Violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 736–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2007). Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: Support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 1050–1061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbert, J.-P., Hurter, C., Peysakhovich, V., Blätter, C., Dehais, F., & Camachon, C. (2015). Design requirements to integrate eye trackers in simulation environments: Aeronautical use case. In R. Neves-Silva, L. Jain, & R. Howlett (Eds.), Intelligent decision technologies. Smart innovation, systems and technologies (Vol. 39, pp. 231–242). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19857-6_21
   Google Scholar
• Iwanaga, M., & Nittono, H. (2010). Unexpected action effects elicit deviance-related brain potentials and cause behavioral delay. Psychophysiology, 47(2), 281–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körner, U., Röer, J. P., Buchner, A., & Bell, R. (2017). Working memory capacity is equally unrelated to auditory distraction by changing-state and deviant sounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 96, 122–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs, R. M., Park, H. R. P., Bombeke, K., & Boehler, C. N. (2018). Modulation of locus coeruleus activity by novel oddball stimuli. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 12, 577–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H.-I., Kidani, S., Yoneya, M., Kashino, M., & Furukawa, S. (2016). Correspondences among pupillary dilation response, subjective salience of sounds, and loudness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(2), 412–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H.-I., Yoneya, M., Kidani, S., Kashino, M., & Furukawa, S. (2016). Human pupillary dilation response to deviant auditory stimuli: Effects of stimulus properties and voluntary attention. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10, Article 43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenstein, O., & Loewenfeld, I. E. (1962). The pupil. In H. Dayson (Ed.), The eye: Vol. 3. Muscular mechanisms (pp. 256–329). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, T. F., & Furedy, J. J. (1979). A comparison of the pupillary and electrodermal components of the orienting reflex in sensitivity for initial stimulus presentation, repetition and change. In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. van Olst, & J. F. Orlebeke (Eds.), The orienting reflex in humans (pp. 381–391). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marois, A., Labonté, K., Parent, M., & Vachon, F. (2018). Eyes have ears: Indexing the orienting response to sound using pupillometry. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 123, 152–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marois, A., Marsh, J. E., & Vachon, F. (2019). Is auditory distraction by changing-state and deviant sounds underpinned by the same mechanism? Evidence from pupillometry. Biological Psychology, 141, 64–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marois, A., & Vachon, F. (2018). Can pupillometry index auditory attentional capture in contexts of active visual processing? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 30(4), 484–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Roër, J. P., Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2014). Predictability and distraction: Does the neural model represent postcategorical features? PsyCh Journal, 3(1), 58–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mathôt, S. (2018). Pupillometry: Psychology, physiology, and function. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mele, M., & Frederici, S. (2012). Gaze and eye-tracking solutions for psychological research. Cognitive Processing, 13(S1), S261–S265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. R., Robertson, I. H., Balsters, J. H., & O’Connell, R. G. (2011). Pupillometry and P3 index the locus coeruleus-noradrenergic arousal function in humans. Psychophysiology, 48(11), 1532–1543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen, R. (1990). The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 201–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassar, M. R., Rumsey, K. M., Wilson, R. C., Parikh, K., Heasly, B., & Gold, J. I. (2012). Rational regulation of learning dynamics by pupil-linked arousal systems. Nature Neuroscience, 15(7), 1040–1046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, O. (1987). Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 361–394). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuis, S., De Geus, E. J., & Aston-Jones, G. (2011). The anatomical and functional relationship between the P3 and autonomic components of the orienting response. Psychophysiology, 48(2), 162–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordby, H., Roth, W. T., & Pfefferbaum, A. (1988). Event-related potentials to breaks in sequences of alternating pitches or interstimulus intervals. Psychophysiology, 25(3), 262–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhman, A. (1979). The orienting response, attention, and learning: An information-processing perspective. In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. van Olst, & J. F. Orlebeke (Eds.), The orienting response in humans (pp. 443–471). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Parmentier, F. B. R., Elsley, J. V., Andrés, P., & Barceló, F. (2011). Why are auditory novels distracting? Contrasting the roles of novelty, violation of expectation and stimulus change. Cognition, 119(3), 374–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payzan-LeNestour, E., Dunne, S., Bossaerts, P., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2013). The neural representation of unexpected uncertainty during value-based decision making. Neuron, 79(1), 191–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(10), 2128–2148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosburg, T. (2004). Effects of tone repetition on auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115(4), 898–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, E. R., & Szabadi, E. (2008). Functional neuroanatomy of the noradrenergic locus coeruleus: Its roles in the regulation of arousal and autonomic function part I: Principles of functional organisation. Current Neuropharmacology, 6(3), 235–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sara, S. J. (2009). The locus coeruleus and noradrenergic modulation of cognition. Nature Reviews on Neuroscience, 10(3), 211–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröger, E. (1997). On the detection of auditory deviations: A pre-attentive activation model. Psychophysiology, 34(3), 245–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998). Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: A new distraction paradigm. Cognitive Brain Research, 7(1), 71–87.
   Google Scholar
• Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Perception and the conditioned reflex. Oxford, United Kingdom: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, G. Z., & Barry, R. J. (2011). Pupillary responses and event-related potentials as indices of the orienting reflex. Psychophysiology, 48(12), 1648–1655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, G. Z., & Barry, R. J. (2014). The mechanism of dishabituation. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 8, 14.
   Google Scholar
• Sterpenich, V., D’Argembeau, A., Desseilles, M., Balteau, E., Albouy, G., Vanderwalle, G., … Maquet, P. (2006). The locus coeruleus is involved in the successful retrieval of emotional memories in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26(28), 7416–7423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobii Pro. (2019, December 20). What do validity codes mean? Retrieved from https://connect.tobiipro.com/s/article/What-Do-Validity-Codes-Mean?language=en_US
   Google Scholar
• Tryon, W. (1975). Pupillometry: A Survey of Sources of Variation. Psychophysiology, 12, 90–93. doi:10.1111/psyp.1975.12.issue-1 1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachon, F., Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (2012). Broken expectations: Violation of expectancies, not novelty, captures auditory attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 164–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachon, F., Labonté, K., & Marsh, J. E. (2017). Attentional capture by deviant sounds: A general form of distraction? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 622–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachon, F., Marsh, J. E., & Labonté, K. (2020). The automaticity of semantic processing revisited: Auditory distraction by a categorical deviation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 149(7), 1360–1397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C.-A., & Munoz, D. P. (2015). A circuit for pupil orienting responses: Implications for cognitive modulation of pupil size. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 33, 134–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzel, N., Buttelmann, D., Schieler, A., & Widmann, A. (2016). Infant and adult pupil dilation in response to unexpected sounds. Developmental Psychobiology, 58(3), 382–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzel, N., Schröger, E., & Widmann, A. (2013). The dissociation between the P3a event-related potential and behavioral distraction. Psychophysiology, 50(9), 920–930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widmann, A., Schröger, E., & Wetzel, N. (2018). Emotion lies in the eye of the listener: Emotional arousal to novel sounds is reflected in the sympathetic contribution to the pupil dilation response and the P3. Biological Psychology, 133, 10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, I., Denham, S. L., & Nelken, I. (2009). Modeling the auditory scene: Predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects. Trends in Cognitive Science, 13(12), 532–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A., Koelewijm, T., & Kramer, S. E. (2018). The pupil dilation response to auditory stimuli: Current state of knowledge. Trends in Hearing, 22, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S., Chait, M., Dick, F., Dayan, P., Furukawa, S., & Liao, H.-I. (2019). Pupil-linked phasic arousal evoked by violation but not emergence of regularity within rapid sound sequences. Nature Communications, 10(1), Article 4030.
   Google Scholar