Subjective Metric Organization Directs the Allocation of Attention across Time

References

• Abecasis, D., Brochard, R., Del Río, D., Dufour, A., & Ortiz, T. (2009). Brain lateralization of metrical accenting in musicians. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169(1), 74–78.
   Google Scholar
• Abecasis, D., Brochard, R., Granot, R., & Drake, C. (2005). Differential brain response to metrical accents in isochronous auditory sequences. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22(3), 549–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolger, D., Coull, J. T., & Schön, D. (2014). Metrical rhythm implicitly orients attention in time as indexed by improved target detection and left inferior parietal activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(3), 593–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolger, D., Trost, W., & Schön, D. (2013). Rhythm implicitly affects temporal orienting of attention across modalities. Acta Psychologica, 142(2), 238–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwer, F. L., & Honing, H. (2015). Temporal attending and prediction influence the perception of metrical rhythm: Evidence from reaction times and ERPs. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwer, F. L., Van Zuijen, T. L., & Honing, H. (2014). Beat processing is pre-attentive for metrically simple rhythms with clear accents: An ERP study. Plos One, 9(5), e97467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwer, F. L., Werner, C. M., Knetemann, M., & Honing, H. (2016). Disentangling beat perception from sequential learning and examining the influence of attention and musical abilities on ERP responses to rhythm. Neuropsychologia, 85, 80–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brochard, R., Abecasis, D., Potter, D., Ragot, R., & Drake, C. (2003). The “ticktock” of our internal clock: Direct brain evidence of subjective accents in isochronous sequences. Psychological Science, 14(4), 362–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cason, N., & Schön, D. (2012). Rhythmic priming enhances the phonological processing of speech. Neuropsychologia, 50(11), 2652–2658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celma-Miralles, A., De Menezes, R. F., & Toro, J. M. (2016). Look at the beat, feel the meter: Top–down effects of meter induction on auditory and visual modalities. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirelli, L. K., Spinelli, C., Nozaradan, S., & Trainor, L. J. (2016). Measuring neural entrainment to beat and meter in infants: Effects of music background. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10. doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, G., & Meyer, L. B. (1960). The rhythmic structure of music. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corriveau, K., Pasquini, E., & Goswami, U. (2007). Basic auditory processing skills and specific language impairment: A new look at an old hypothesis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(3), 647–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauer, R. M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics, 11(1), 51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escoffier, N., Herrmann, C. S., & Schirmer, A. (2015). Auditory rhythms entrain visual processes in the human brain: Evidence from evoked oscillations and event-related potentials. NeuroImage, 111, 267–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escoffier, N., Sheng, D. Y. J., & Schirmer, A. (2010). Unattended musical beats enhance visual processing. Acta Psychologica, 135(1), 12–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, S., & Kello, C. T. (2017). Hierarchical organization in the temporal structure of infant-direct speech and song. Cognition, 163, 80–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzroy, A. B., & Sanders, L. D. (2015). Musical meter modulates the allocation of attention across time. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(12), 2339–2351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujioka, T., Ross, B., & Trainor, L. J. (2015). Beta-band oscillations represent auditory beat and its metrical hierarchy in perception and imagery. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(45), 15187–15198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujioka, T., Zendel, B. R., & Ross, B. (2010). Endogenous neuromagnetic activity for mental hierarchy of timing. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(9), 3458–3466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiser, E., Sandmann, P., Jäncke, L., & Meyer, M. (2010). Refinement of metre perception – Training increases hierarchical metre processing. European Journal of Neuroscience, 32(11), 1979–1985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiser, E., Ziegler, E., Jancke, L., & Meyer, M. (2009). Early electrophysiological correlates of meter and rhythm processing in music perception. Cortex, 45(1), 93–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, E. (1989). Advanced measures of music audiation. G.I.A. Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, E., & Alvey, M. (2008). Advanced measures of music audiation (CD-ROM version 1.0). GIA Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami, U., Mead, N., Fosker, T., Huss, M., Barnes, L., & Leong, V. (2013). Impaired perception of syllable stress in children with dyslexia: A longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillyard, S. A., Hink, R. F., Schwent, V. L., & Picton, T. W. (1973). Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science, 182(4108), 177–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huss, M., Verney, J. P., Fosker, T., Mead, N., & Goswami, U. (2011). Music, rhythm, rise time perception and developmental dyslexia: Perception of musical meter predicts reading and phonology. Cortex, 47(6), 674–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, J. R., Repp, B. H., & Patel, A. D. (2009). Annals of the New York academy of sciences, 1169(the neurosciences and music III disorders and plasticity). Top-Down Control of Rhythm Perception Modulates Early Auditory Responses, 58–73. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04579.x
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. R. (1976). Time, our lost dimension: Toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. Psychological Review, 83(5), 323–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. R., & Boltz, M. (1989). Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychological Review, 96(3), 459–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. R., Boltz, M., & Kidd, G. (1982). Controlled attending as a function of melodic and temporal context. Perception & Psychophysics, 32(3), 211–218.
   Google Scholar
• Jongsma, M. L. A., Desain, P., & Honing, H. (2004). Rhythmic context influences the auditory evoked potentials of musicians and nonmusicians. Biological Psychology, 66(2), 129–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiparsky, P. (1975). Stress, syntax, and meter. Language, 51(3) JSTOR, 576–616. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kononowicz, T. W., & Penney, T. B. (2016). The contingent negative variation (CNV): Timing isn’t everything. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 8, 231–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(1), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Ladinig, O., Honing, H., Háden, G., & Winkler, I. (2009). Probing attentive and preattentive emergent meter in adult listeners without extensive music training. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26(4), 377–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, K., Rösler, F., & Röder, B. (2003). Early processing stages are modulated when auditory stimuli are presented at an attended moment in time: An event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 40(5), 806–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Large, E. W., & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. Psychological Review, 106(1), 119–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, M. A. (2013). ez: Easy analysis and visualization of factorial experiments. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ez
   Google Scholar
• Leong, V., Hämäläinen, J., Soltész, F., & Goswami, U. (2011). Rise time perception and detection of syllable stress in adults with developmental dyslexia. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(1), 59–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liégeois-Chauvel, C., Musolino, A., Badier, J. M., Marquis, P., & Chauvel, P. (1994). Evoked potentials recorded from the auditory cortex in man: Evaluation and topography of the middle latency components. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 92(3), 204–214.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopez-Calderon, J., & Luck, S. J. (2014). ERPLAB: An open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangun, G. R., & Hillyard, S. A. (1987). The spatial allocation of visual attention as indexed by event-related brain potentials. Human Factors, 29(2), 195–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattys, S. L., & Samuel, A. G. (1997). How lexical stress affects speech segmentation and interactivity: Evidence from the migration paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 36(1), 87–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007). The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(12), 2544–2590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen, R., & Picton, T. W. (1986). N2 and automatic versus controlled processes. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. Supplement, 38, 169–186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nobre, A. C., & Van Ede, F. (2018). Anticipated moments: Temporal structure in attention. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 19(1), 34–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozaradan, S., Peretz, I., Missal, M., & Mouraux, A. (2011). Tagging the neuronal entrainment to beat and meter. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(28), 10234–10240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozaradan, S., Peretz, I., & Mouraux, A. (2012). Selective neuronal entrainment to the beat and meter embedded in a musical rhythm. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(49), 17572–17581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, C., & Krumhansl, C. L. (1990). Mental representations for musical meter. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 16(4), 728–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantev, C., Lütkenhöner, B., Hoke, M., & Lehnertz, K. (1986). Comparison between simultaneously recorded auditory-evoked magnetic fields and potentials elicited by ipsilateral, contralateral and binaural tone burst stimulation. Audiology, 25(1), 54–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patel, A. D. (2008). Music, language, and the brain. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, M. A., & Samuel, A. G. (1990). The use of rhythm in attending to speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 16(3), 564–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polich, J., & Kok, A. (1995). Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: An integrative review. Biological Psychology, 41(2), 103–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, D. D., Fenwick, M., Abecasis, D., & Brochard, R. (2009). Perceiving rhythm where none exists: Event-related potential (ERP) correlates of subjective accenting. Cortex, 45(1), 103–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Repp, B. H. (2010). Do metrical accents create illusory phenomenal accents? Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72(5), 1390–1403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, S., & Goswami, U. (2015). Auditory processing in specific language impairment (sli): Relations with the perception of lexical and phrasal stress. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(4), 1292–1305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, S., & Goswami, U. (2019). Impaired recognition of metrical and syntactic boundaries in children with developmental language disorders. Brain Sciences, 9(2), 33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, R. S., Vlek, R. J., & Desain, P. (2011). Decomposing rhythm processing: Electroencephalography of perceived and self-imposed rhythmic patterns. Psychological Research, 75(2), 95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998). Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: A new distraction paradigm. Cognitive Brain Research, 7(1), 71–87.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, J. L., McHugh, A., & Martin, J. G. (1974). Reaction time to phoneme targets as a function of rhythmic cues in continuous speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102(2), 250–255.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, J. S., & Large, E. W. (2005). Gamma-band activity reflects the metric structure of rhythmic tone sequences. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(1), 117–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Team, R. (2014). RStudio: Integrated development for R. http://www.rstudio.org/
   Google Scholar
• Teder-Sälejärvi, W. A., & Hillyard, S. A. (1998). The gradient of spatial auditory attention in free field: An event-related potential study. Perception & Psychophysics, 60(7), 1228–1242.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tierney, A., & Kraus, N. (2013). Neural responses to sounds presented on and off the beat of ecologically valid music. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00014
   Google Scholar
• Van Noorden, L., & Moelants, D. (1999). Resonance in the perception of musical pulse. Journal of New Music Research. XXVIII/1 (March 1999): Foundations of Rhythm Perception, 28(1), 43–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan Jr., H. G., & Ritter, W. (1970). The sources of auditory evoked responses recorded from the human scalp. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 28(4), 360–367.
   Google Scholar
• Vlek, R. J., Schaefer, R. S., Gielen, C. C. A. M., Farquhar, J. D. R., & Desain, P. (2011). Shared mechanisms in perception and imagery of auditory accents. Clinical Neurophysiology, 122(8), 1526–1532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuust, P., Ostergaard, L., Pallesen, K. J., Bailey, C., & Roepstorff, A. (2009). Predictive coding of music – Brain responses to rhythmic incongruity. Cortex, 45(1), 80–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuust, P., Pallesen, K. J., Bailey, C., Van Zuijen, T. L., Gjedde, A., Roepstorff, A., & Østergaard, L. (2005). To musicians, the message is in the meter: Pre-attentive neuronal responses to incongruent rhythm are left-lateralized in musicians. NeuroImage, 24(2), 560–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, T. (2013). corrplot: Visualization of a correlation matrix. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=corrplot
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2007). Reshaping data with the reshape package. Journal of Statistical Software, 21(12), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2016). Ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis (2nd ed.). Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4
   Google Scholar
• Woodruff Carr, K., Fitzroy, A. B., Tierney, A., White-Schwoch, T., & Kraus, N. (2017). Incorporation of feedback during beat synchronization is an index of neural maturation and reading skills. Brain and Language, 164, 43–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, T. C., & Kuhl, P. K. (2016). Musical intervention enhances infants’ neural processing of temporal structure in music and speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113( 19), 5212–5217.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, T. C., Lam, H. T. G., Sohi, H., & Kuhl, P. K. (2017). Neural processing of musical meter in musicians and non-musicians. Neuropsychologia, 106, 289–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar