The Fate of the Unattended Revisited: Can Irrelevant Speech Prime the Non-dominant Interpretation of Homophones?

References

• Allport, A. (1989). Visual attention. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 631–682). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(3), 261–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90201-3
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1063–1087. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banbury, S. P., Macken, W. J., Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (2001). Auditory Distraction and Short-Term Memory: Phenomena and Practical Implications. Human Factors, 43(1), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872001775992462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaman, C. P. (2005). Auditory distraction from low‐intensity noise: A review of the consequences for learning and workplace environments. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(8), 1041–1064. doi:10.1002/acp.1134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R., Röer, J. P., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2019). Distraction by steady-state sounds: Evidence for a graded attentional model of auditory distraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 45(4), 500–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentin, S., Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1995). Semantic processing and memory for attended and unattended words in dichotic listening: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 21(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.1.54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besken, M., & Mulligan, N. W. (2010). Context effects in auditory implicit memory. Quarterly. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(10), 2012–2030. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470211003660501
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, A. M., & Jones, D. M. (1996). Word dose in the disruption of serial recall by irrelevant speech: Phonological confusions or changing state? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 49(4), 919–939. doi:10.1080/027249896392360
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. Pergamon Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/10037-000
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, D. E. (1971). Cognitive psychology: Introduction. British Medical Bulletin, 27(3), 191–194. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchner, A., Irmen, L., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). On the irrelevance of semantic information for the “Irrelevant Speech” effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 49(3), 765–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, T. A., & Marsh, J. E. (2019). On corticopetal–corticofugal loops of the new early filter. NeuroReport, 30(3), 202–206. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000001184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Colle, H. A., & Welsh, A. (1976). Acoustic masking in primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(76)90003-7
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, A. R. A., & Kane, M. J. (2001). Capacity, control and conflict: An individual differences perspective on attentional capture. Advances in Psychology, 133, 349–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4115(01)80016-9
   Google Scholar
• Eich, E. (1984). Memory for unattended events: Remembering with and without awareness. Memory & Cognition, 12(2), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03198423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, E. M., Bell, R., Gorin, S., Robinson, N., & Marsh, J. E. (2022). Auditory distraction can be studied online! A direct comparison between in-person and online experimentation. Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University. Manuscript submitted for publication
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G. (1992). New Look 3: Unconscious cognition reclaimed. American Psychologist, 47(6), 766–779. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.47.6.766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerreiro, M. J., Murphy, D. R., & Van Gerven, P. W. (2010). The role of sensory modality in age-related distraction: A critical review and a renewed view. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 975–1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/a002073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halin, N., Marsh, J. E., Hellman, A., Hellström, I., & Sörqvist, P. (2014). A shield against distraction. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henninger, F., Shevchenko, Y., Mertens, U. K., Kieslich, P. J., & Hilbig, B. E. (2019). lab.js: A free, open, online study builder. Behavior Research Methods, 54(2), 556–573. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01283-5
   Google Scholar
• Holender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00021269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. W. (2014). Auditory distraction: A duplex-mechanism account. PsyCh Journal, 3(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hughes, G., Desantis, A., & Waszak, F. (2013). Attenuation of auditory N1 results from identity-specific action-effect prediction. European Journal of Neuroscience, 37(7), 1152–1158. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. W., & Marsh, J. E. (2020). When is forewarned forearmed? Predicting auditory distraction in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(3), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.44 
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, C., & Thomsen, J. P. (2014). Self-Reported cheating in web surveys on political knowledge. Quality & Quantity, 48(6), 3343–3354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9960-z
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. (1990). Recent advances in the study of human performance in noise. Environment International, 16(4–6), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-4120(90)90013-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. (1999). The cognitive psychology of auditory distraction: The 1997 BPS Broadbent Lecture. British Journal of Psychology, 90(2), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712699161314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. M., Marsh, J. E., & Hughes, R. W. (2012). Retrieval from memory: Vulnerable or inviolable? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(4), 905–922. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenett, Y. N., & Faust, M. (2019). A semantic network cartography of the creative mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(4), 271–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labonté, K., Marsh, J. E., & Vachon, F. (2021). Distraction by auditory categorical deviations is unrelated to working memory capacity: Further evidence of a distinction between acoustic and categorical deviation effects. Auditory Perception & Cognition, 4(3–4), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/25742442.2022.2033109
   Google Scholar
• LeCompte, D. C., & Shaibe, D. M. (1997). On the irrelevance of phonological similarity to the irrelevant speech effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 50(1), 100–118. doi:10.1080/713755679.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Littlefair, Z., Vachon, F., Ball, L. J., Robinson, N., & Marsh, J. E. (2022). Acoustic and categorical deviation effects are produced by different mechanisms: Evidence from additivity and habituation. Auditory Perception & Cognition, 5(1–2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/25742442.2022.2063609
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Campbell, T. A., John, J. P., Mehrotra, S., & Kutty, B. M. (2016). Processing complex sounds passing through the rostral brainstem: The new early filter model. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10(136), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00136
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (2008). Auditory distraction in semantic memory: A process-based approach. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(3), 682–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (2009). Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction. Cognition, 110(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Hughes, R. W., Sörqvist, P., Beaman, C. P., & Jones, D. M. (2015). Erroneous and veridical recall are not two sides of the same coin: Evidence from semantic distraction in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(6), 1728–1740. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Threadgold, E., Barker, M. E., Litchfield, D., Degno, F., & Ball, L. J. (2021). The susceptibility of compound remote associate problems to disruption by irrelevant sound: A window onto the component processes underpinning creative cognition? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 33(6–7), 793–822. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2021.1900201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Yang, J., Qualter, P., Richardson, C., Perham, N., Vachon, F., & Hughes, R. W. (2018). Post-categorical auditory distraction in short-term memory: Insights from increased task load and task type. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(6), 882–897. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, M. E., & Fernandes, M. A. (2016). The role of semantically related distractors during encoding and retrieval of words in long-term memory. Memory, 24(6), 801–811. doi:10.1080/09658211.2015.1053491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, Z., Lan, Z., Yan, G., Marsh, J. E., & Liversedge, S. P. (2020). Task demands modulate the effects of speech on text processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(10), 1892–1905. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297–326. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11(1), 56–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470215908416289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, C. B., & LeCompte, D. C. (1999). The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect. Memory & Cognition, 27(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03201211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, O. (1987). Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action. Erlbaum. 361–394.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, O. (1996). Theories of attention. In O. Neumann & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action (Vol. 3, pp. 389–446). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1874-5822(96)80027-2.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, A. P., & Jones, D. M. (2002). The sandwich effect reassessed: Effects of streaming, distraction, and modality. Memory & Cognition, 30(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmentier, F. B. R. (2014). The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: A review. Psychological Research, 78(3), 321–338. doi:10.1007/s00426-013-0534-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1959). The propensity interpretation of probability. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 10(37), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/x.37.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röer, J. P., Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2013). Self-relevance increases the irrelevant sound effect: Attentional disruption by one’s own name. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(8), 925–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.828063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röer, J. P., Bell, R., Buchner, A., Saint-Aubin, J., Sonier, R. P., Marsh, J. E., & Arnström, S. (2021). A multilingual preregistered replication of the semantic mismatch effect on serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48(7) . Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001066
   Google Scholar
• Röer, J. P., Bell, R., Körner, U., & Buchner, A. (2019). A semantic mismatch effect on serial recall: Evidence from interlexical processing of irrelevant speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(3), 515–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röer, J. P., & Cowan, N. (2021). A preregistered replication and extension of the cocktail party phenomenon: One’s name captures attention; unexpected words do not. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47 (2), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röer, J. P., Körner, U., Buchner, A., & Bell, R. (2017a). Attentional capture by taboo words: A functional view of auditory distraction. Emotion, 17(4), 740–750. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röer, J. P., Körner, U., Buchner, A., & Bell, R. (2017b). Semantic priming by irrelevant speech. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(4), 1205–1210. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1186-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salame, P., & Baddeley, A. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 21(2), 150–164. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90521-7.
   Google Scholar
• Sörqvist, P., Dahlström, Ö., Karlsson, T., & Rönnberg, J. (2016). Concentration: The neural underpinnings of how cognitive load shields against distraction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10 (221), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00221
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sörqvist, P., & Marsh, J. E. (2015). How concentration shields against distraction. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24 (4), 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415577356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörqvist, P., Stenfelt, S., & Rönnberg, J. (2012). Working memory capacity and visual–verbal cognitive load modulate auditory–sensory gating in the brainstem: Toward a unified view of attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(11), 2147–2154. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. M. (1964). Selective attention in man. British Medical Bulletin, 20(1), 12–16. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, A., & Geffen, G. (1968). Selective attention and cerebral dominance in perceiving and responding to speech messages. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640746808400142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, K., Kraus, N., McGee, T., Ponton, C., & Otis, B. (2001). Central auditory plasticity: Changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training. Ear and Hearing, 22 (2), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200104000-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachon, F., Marsh, J. E., & Labonté, K. (2020). The automaticity of semantic processing revisited: Auditory distraction by a categorical deviation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 149(7), 1360–1397. doi:10.1037/xge0000714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1992). Selective attention in vision. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• White, K. K., & Abrams, L. (2004). Free associations and dominance ratings of homophones for young and older adults. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 36(3), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195589
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wood, N., & Cowan, N. (1995). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: How frequent are attention shifts to one’s name in an irrelevant auditory channel? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 255–260. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, K. J. P., Siegel, M. H., Traer, J., & McDermott, J. H. (2017). Headphone screening to facilitate web-based auditory experiments. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 79(7), 2064–2072. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, N. L., Stadler, M. A., & Cowan, N. (1997). Is there implicit memory without attention? A re-examination of Eich’s procedure. Memory & Cognition, 25 (6), 772–779. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03211320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar