Influence of Talker and Accent Variability on Rapid Adaptation and Generalization to Non-Native Accented Speech in Younger and Older Adults

References

• Adank, P., & Janse, E. (2010). Comprehension of a novel accent by young and older listeners. Psychology and Aging, 25(3), 736–740. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahissar, M., Nahum, M., Nelken, I., & Hochstein, S. (2009). Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1515), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, J. E. D., & Nygaard, L. C. (2019). Specificity and generalization in perceptual adaptation to systematic variation in speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145(6), 3382–3398. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5110302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atagi, E., & Bent, T. (2011). Perceptual dimensions of nonnative speech. The 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPHS XVII), (pp. 260–263).
   Google Scholar
• Atagi, E., & Bent, T. (2013). Auditory free classification of nonnative speech. Journal of Phonetics, 41(6), 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baese-Berk, M. M., Bradlow, A. R., & Wright, B. A. (2013). Accent-independent adaptation to foreign accented speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(3), EL174–EL180. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4789864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, B., Gowen, E., Munro, K. J., & Adank, P. (2015). Cognitive predictors of perceptual adaptation to accented speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(4), 2015–2024. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4916265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bench, J., Kowal, A., & Bamford, J. (1979). The bkb (bamford-kowal-bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children’. British Journal of Audiology, 13(3), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.3109/03005367909078884
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bieber, R. E., & Gordon-Salant, S. (2017). Adaptation to novel foreign-accented speech and retention of benefit following training: Influence of aging and hearing loss. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(4), 2800–2811. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4980063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieber, R. E., & Gordon-Salant, S. (2022). Semantic context and stimulus variability independently affect rapid adaptation to non-native English speech in young adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 151(1), 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0009170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2018). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [computer program]. Version 6.0. 37.
   Google Scholar
• Bradlow, A. R. (n.d.). OSCAAR - The online speech/corpora archive & analysis resource. Retrieved March 26, 2020, from https://oscaar3.ling.northwestern.edu/#!/about
   Google Scholar
• Bradlow, A. R., Akahane-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D. B., & Tohkura, Y. (1999). Training Japanese listeners to identify english/r/and/1/: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(5), 977–985. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206911
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106(2), 707–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burda, A. N., Scherz, J. A., Hageman, C. F., & Edwards, H. T. (2003). Age and understanding speakers with Spanish or Taiwanese accents. Perceptual and motor skills, 97(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2003.97.1.11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. Y., Hu, E. R., & Perrachione, T. K. (2018). Varying acoustic-phonemic ambiguity reveals that talker normalization is obligatory in speech processing. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 80(3), 784–797. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1395-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, C. M., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(6), 3647–3658. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1815131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clopper, C. G., & Pisoni, D. B. (2004). Effects of talker variability on perceptual learning of dialects. Language and Speech, 47(3), 207–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309040470030101
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Hervais-Adelman, A. G., Taylor, K., & McGettigan, C. (2005). Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(2), 222–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupoux, E., & Green, K. (1997). Perceptual adjustment to highly compressed speech: Effects of talker and rate changes. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 23(3), 914–927. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.23.3.914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant, S., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., & Fitzgibbons, P. J. (2010a). Recognition of accented English in quiet and noise by younger and older listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(5), 3152–3160. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3495940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant, S., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., & Fitzgibbons, P. J. (2010b). Recognition of accented English in quiet by younger normal-hearing listeners and older listeners with normal-hearing and hearing loss. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(1), 444–455. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3397409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant, S., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Fitzgibbons, P. J., & Schurman, J. (2010). Short-term adaptation to accented English by younger and older adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(4), EL200–EL204. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3486199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (1987). Generalized additive models: Some applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(398), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1987.10478440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henshaw, H., & Ferguson, M. (2013). Assessing the benefits of auditory training to real-world listening: Identifying appropriate and sensitive outcomes. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, Nyborg, Denmark (Vol. 4. pp. 45–52). https://proceedings.isaar.eu/index.php/isaarproc/article/view/2013-05
   Google Scholar
• Hervais-Adelman, A., Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., & Carlyon, R. P. (2008). Perceptual learning of noise vocoded words: Effects of feedback and lexicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 34(2), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervais-Adelman, A., Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Taylor, K. J., & Carlyon, R. P. (2011). Generalization of perceptual learning of vocoded speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 37(1), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & van de Schoot, R. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huyck, J. J., Smith, R. H., Hawkins, S., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2017). Generalization of perceptual learning of degraded speech across talkers. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 60(11), 3334–3341. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-16-0300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English/r/and/l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94(3), 1242–1255. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.408177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B., Yamada, R. A., Yoh’ichi, T., & Yamada, T. (1994). Training Japanese listeners to identify English/r/and/l/. Iii. Long-term retention of new phonetic categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96(4), 2076–2087. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.410149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, P., Zhang, F., Yu, A., & Zhao, X. (2019). Language history questionnaire (LHQ3): An enhanced tool for assessing multilingual experience. Bilingualism, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918001153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English/r/and/l/: A first report. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(2), 874–886. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1894649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthra, S., Mechtenberg, H., & Myers, E. B. (2021). Perceptual learning of multiple talkers requires additional exposure. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 83(5), 2217–2228. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02261-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnuson, J. S., Nusbaum, H. C., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Saltzman, D. (2021). Talker familiarity and the accommodation of talker variability. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 83(4), 1842–1860. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02203-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manheim, M., Lavie, L., & Banai, K. (2018). Age, hearing, and the perceptual learning of rapid speech. Trends in Hearing, 22, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216518778651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattys, S. L., Brooks, J., & Cooke, M. (2009). Recognizing speech under a processing load: Dissociating energetic from informational factors. Cognitive Psychology, 59(3), 203–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, D. J., Colvett, J. S., Bugg, J. M., & Van Engen, K. J. (2023). Sequence effects and speech processing: Cognitive load for speaker-switching within and across accents. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-023-02322-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullennix, J. W., Pisoni, D. B., & Martin, C. (1989). Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85(1), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.397688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., BéDirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005). The montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., Soli, S. D., & Sullivan, J. A. (1994). Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95(2), 1085–1099. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.408469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz, J. A., & Wright, B. A. (2010). Differential rates of consolidation of conceptual and stimulus learning following training on an auditory skill. Experimental brain research, 201(3), 441–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-2053-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peelle, J. E., & Wingfield, A. (2005). Dissociations in perceptual learning revealed by adult age differences in adaptation to time-compressed speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1315–1330. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitan, R. M. (1971). Trail making test results for normal and brain-damaged children. Perceptual and motor skills, 33(2), 575–581. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1971.33.2.575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. L., Yang, H., Turner, S. D., & Simpson, G. L. (2012). An assessment of the mechanisms for the transfer of lead and mercury from atmospherically contaminated organic soils to lake sediments with particular reference to Scotland, UK. Geochimica et cosmochimica acta, 82, 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2010.12.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. (2004). What and when of cognitive aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4), 140–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00293.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidaras, S. K., Alexander, J. E. D., & Nygaard, L. C. (2009). Perceptual learning of systematic variation in Spanish-accented speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(5), 3306–3316. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3101452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers, M. S. (1997). Stimulus variability and spoken word recognition. II. The effects of age and hearing impairment. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(4), 2278–2288. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.418208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sóskuthy, M. (2017). Generalised additive mixed models for dynamic analysis in linguistics: A practical introduction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.05339.
   Google Scholar
• Sóskuthy, M. (2021). Evaluating generalised additive mixed modelling strategies for dynamic speech analysis. Journal of Phonetics, 84, 101017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2020.101017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilp, C. E., & Theodore, R. M. (2020). Talker normalization is mediated by structured indexical information. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 82(5), 2237–2243. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-01971-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643–662. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651
   Google Scholar
• Tarabeih-Ghanayim, M., Lavner, Y., & Banai, K. (2020). Tasks, talkers, and the perceptual learning of time-compressed speech. Auditory Perception and Cognition, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/25742442.2020.1846011
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, P., Brisson, V., & Deschamps, I. (2021). Brain aging and speech perception: Effects of background noise and talker variability. Neuroimage: Reports, 227, 117675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117675
   Google Scholar
• Tzeng, C. Y., Alexander, J. E., Sidaras, S. K., & Nygaard, L. C. (2016). The role of training structure in perceptual learning of accented speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 42(11), 1793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, T., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. (2007). Effects of acoustic variability in the perceptual learning of non-native-accented speech sounds. Phonetica, 64(2–3), 122–144. https://doi.org/10.1159/000107913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weintraub, S., Dikmen, S. S., Heaton, R. K., Tulsky, D. S., Zelazo, P. D., Bauer, P. J., Carlozzi, N. E., Slotkin, J., Blitz, D., Wallner-Allen, K., Fox, N. A., Beaumont, J. L., Mungas, D., Nowinski, C. J., Richler, J., Deocampo, J. A., Anderson, J. E., Manly, J. J., Borosh, B., & Gershon, R. C. (2013). Cognition assessment using the NIH toolbox. Neurology, 80(Issue 11, Supplement 3), S54–S64. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182872ded
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Westfall, J., Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (2014). Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5), 2020–2045. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieling, M. (2018). Analyzing dynamic phonetic data using generalized additive mixed modeling: A tutorial focusing on articulatory differences between L1 and L2 speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, 70, 86–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, B., & Wieling, M. (2016). How to analyze linguistic change using mixed models, growth curve analysis and generalized additive modeling. Journal of Language Evolution, 1(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzv003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witteman, M. J., Weber, A., & McQueen, J. M. (2014). Tolerance for inconsistency in foreign-accented speech. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(2), 512–519. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0519-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S. N. (2006). Low-rank scale-invariant tensor product smooths for generalized additive mixed models. Biometrics Bulletin, 62(4), 1025–1036. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00574.x
   Google Scholar
• Xie, X., & Jaeger, T. F. (2020). Comparing non-native and native speech: Are L2 productions more variable?. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 147(5), 3322–3347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, X., Liu, L., & Jaeger, T. F. (2021). Cross-talker generalization in the perception of nonnative speech: A large-scale replication. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(11), e22–e56. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, X., & Myers, E. B. (2017). Learning a talker or learning an accent: Acoustic similarity constrains generalization of foreign accent adaptation to new talkers. Journal of Memory and Language, 97, 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Cheng, B., & Zhang, Y. (2021). The role of talker variability in nonnative phonetic learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 64(12), 4802–4825. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar