References
- Alakeson, V., Bunnin, A., and Miller, C., 2013. Coproduction of health and wellbeing outcomes: the new paradigm for effective health and social care. London: OPM.
- APPG, 2017. All-party parliamentary group on arts, health and wellbeing inquiry report creative health: the arts for health and wellbeing Available from http://www.artshealthandwellbeing.org.uk/appg-inquiry/Publications/Creative_Health_Inquiry_Report_2017_-_Second_Edition.pdf
- Arnstein, S.R., 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35 (4), 216–224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
- Beresford, P. and Carr, S., 2016. Social care, service users and user involvement. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 28 (2), 95. doi:10.11157/anzswj-vol28iss2id229
- Bovaird, T., 2007. Beyond engagement and participation: user and community coproduction of public services. Public administration review(October), 846–860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
- Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3 (2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- C4CC, 2015. A co-production model: coalition for collaborative care. Available from http://coalitionforcollaborativecare.org.uk/a-co-production-model/
- Consilium, 2016. Evaluation of the cultural commissioning programme final report. London. Available from: https://www.ncvo.org.uk/practical-support/public-services/cultural-commissioning-programme
- Creswell, J.W. and Miller, D.L., 2000. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into practice, 39 (3), 124–130. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
- Crone, D., Ellis, L., and Bryan, H., 2017. Understanding learning in cultural commissioning: a qualitative process evaluation of the NHS gloucestershire cultural commissioning grant programme. UK: University of Gloucestershire.
- Durose, C., et al., 2017. Generating ‘good enough’ evidence for co-production. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 13 (1), 135–151. doi:10.1332/174426415X14440619792955
- Filipe, A., Renedo, A., and Marston, C., 2017. The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS biology, 15 (5), 1–6. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403
- Harris, M., Penny, J., and Slay, J., 2013. Doing services differently: local innovations for disabled people and their families: new economics foundation/Scope. London: New Economics Foundation
- Lambert, S.D. and Loiselle, C.G., 2008. Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness. Journal of advanced nursing, 62 (2), 228–237. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04559.x
- Mays, N. and Pope, C., 2000. Qualitative research in health care: assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 320 (7226), 50. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50
- Munoz, S.-A., et al., 2014. Involving rural older people in service co-production: is there an untapped pool of potential participants? Journal of rural studies, 34, 212–222. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.02.001
- Needham, C. and Carr, S., 2009. Co-production: an emerging evidence base for adult social care transformation. Social Care Institute for Excellence. London.
- Oliver, K., Kothari, A., and Mays, N., 2019. The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research? Health Research Policy and Systems, 17 (1), 33. doi:10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3
- Osborne, S.P., Radnor, Z., and Strokosch, K., 2016. Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: a suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18 (5), 639–653. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927
- Penny, J., Slay, J., and Stephens, L., 2012. People powered health co-production catalogue. London: Nesta.
- Pestoff, V., 2014. Collective action and the sustainability of co-production. Public Management Review, 16 (3), 383–401. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.841460
- Polkinghorne, D.E., 2005. Language and meaning: data collection in qualitative research. Journal of counseling psychology, 52 (2), 137. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.137
- Staricoff, R.L., 2006. Arts in health: the value of evaluation. The journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, 126 (3), 116–120.