251
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A conductor’s standpoint: an institutional ethnography of a conductive education centre in Birmingham, UK

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Abberley, P., 1987. The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability. Disability, handicap & society, 2, 5–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02674648766780021
  • Alderson, P., 2004. Ethics. In: S. Fraser, et al., eds. Doing research with children and young people. London: Sage Publications, 97–112.
  • Aubrey, C., David, T., Godfrey, R. and Thompson, L. (2000) Early Childhood Educational Research: Issues in methodology and Ethics. Oxon: Routledge
  • Bairstow, P., 1992. Evaluation of conductive education: the selection process. Educational and child psychology, 9 (1), 57–63.
  • Beresford, B., 1997. Personal accounts involving disabled children in research. London: HMSO.
  • Blackburn, C. (2014) The policy to practice context to the delays and difficulties in the acquisition of speech, language and communication in the first five years. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Birmingham: Birmingham City University.
  • Blank, R., et al., 2008. Conductive education for children with cerebral palsy: effects on hand motor functions relevant to activities of daily living. Archives physical and medical rehabilitation, 89, 251–259. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.138
  • British Education Research Association, 2018. Ethical guidelines for educational research. 4th ed. [Online] https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018 [Accessed 22 January 2020].
  • Brooks, T. (2010). Developing a learning environment which supports children with profound autistic spectrum disorders to engage as effective learners. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Worcester: University of Worcester
  • Brown, M., 2006. An insight into the benefits of conductive education. Nursing & residential care, 8 (3), 122–125. March doi:https://doi.org/10.12968/nrec.2006.8.3.20559
  • Cameron, C., 2008. Further towards an affirmation model. In: T. Campbell, et al., ed.. Disability studies: emerging insights and perspectives. Leeds: The Disability Press.
  • Campbell, M., 2006. Institutional ethnography and experience as data. In: E. Smith, ed. Institutional ethnography as practice. Maryland: Rowman and Littleford, 91–108.
  • Campbell, M. and Gregor, F., 2008. Mapping social relations: a primer in doing institutional ethnography. Toronto: Higher Education University of Toronto Press Inc.
  • Coleman, K. and Reddihough, D., 1995. A pilot evaluation of conductive educationbased intervention for children with cerebral palsy: the tongala project. Journal of paediatric child health, 31, 412–417. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.1995.tb00849.x
  • Curran, H., et al. 2018. It’s about time: the impact of SENCO workload on the professional and the school. Bath: Bath Spa University Online: http://researchspace.bathspa.ac.uk/11859/ [Accessed 1 August 2019].
  • Department for Education (DfE (2017) Early Years Foundation Stage Statutory Framework Online [accessed 15.10.2020 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2]
  • Department for Education (DfE)/Department of Health (DOH). 2015. Special educational needs (SEN) code of practice: statutory guidance for organisations who work with and support children and young people with SEN. Online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/398815/SEND_Code_of_Practice_January_2015.pdf [Accessed 18 September 2020].
  • DeVault, M.L. and McCoy, L., 2006. Institutional ethnography: using interviews to investigate ruling relations. In: E. Smith, ed. Institutional ethnography as practice. Maryland: Rowman and Littleford, 15–44.
  • Dunst, C., 2002. Family-centered practices: birth through high school. The journal of special education, 36, 139–147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669020360030401
  • Emerson, A. and Holroyd, F. 2019. Conductive education: thirty years on disability & society.
  • Fine, G.A. and Sandstrom, K.L. 1988. Knowing children: participant observation with minors (Qualitative Research Methods Series 15). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
  • King, G. and Chiarello, L., 2014. Family-centered care for children with cerebral palsy: conceptual and practical considerations to advance care and practice. Journal of child neurology, 29, 1046–1054. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073814533009
  • Konaka, J., 2007. Sherborne @ Sunfield an adapted approach to support social engagement of young people with ASD through sherborne developmental movement. In: B. Carpenter and J. Egerton, eds. New horizons in special education: evidence-based practice in action. Worcester: Sunfield Publications, 37–58.
  • Liberty, K., 2004. Developmental gains in early intervention based on conductive education by young children with motor disorders. International journal of rehabilitation research, 27 (1), 17–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-200403000-00003
  • Lind, L., 2003. “The pieces fall into place”: the views of three Swedish habilitation teams on conductive education and support of disabled children. International journal of rehabilitation research, 26 (1), 11–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mrr.0000054810.81886.e5
  • Mason, J., 2004. The legal context. In: S. Fraser, et al., eds.. Doing research with children and young people. London: Sage Publications.
  • Morgan, A. and Hogan, K., 2005. School placement and conductive education: the experiences of education administrators. British journal of special education, 32 (3), 149–156. 31 August. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-3383.2005.00388.x.
  • Novak, I., et al., 2013. A systematic review of interventions for children with cerebral palsy: state of the evidence. Developmental medicine and child neurology, 55 (10), 885–910. - PubMed.
  • Odman, P. and Oberg, B., 2006. Effectiveness and expectations of intensive training: A comparision between child and youth rehabilitation and conductive education. Disability and rehabilitation, 28 (9), 561–570. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930500218821
  • Oliver, M., 1996. Understanding disability. From theory to practice. Hampshire: Palgrave.
  • Professional Conductors Association, 2009. What is conductive education? Birmingham: Conductive Education Professional Education Group.
  • Rankin, J., 2017. Conducting analysis in institutional ethnography: analytical work prior to commencing data collection. International journal of qualitative methods, 16, 1–9.
  • Reid, J., 2017. Reflexivity and praxis: the redress of ‘I’ poems in revealing standpoint. In: Perspectives on and from institutional ethnography. Qualitative studies in methodology. Emerald, Bingley, 15. ISBN 9781787146532
  • Rosenbaum, P., et al., 1998. Familycentered service: a conceptual framework and research review. Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics, 18, 1–20.
  • Schenker, R., et al., 2016. Is a family-centred initiative a family-centred service? A case of a conductive education setting for children with cerebral palsy. Child: care, health and development, 42 (6), 909–917. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12354
  • Scotch, R. and Schriner, K., 1997. Disability as human variation: implications for policy. Annals of the American academy of political and social science, 549, 148–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716297549001011
  • Shelton, T.L. and Stepanek, J.S., 1995. Excerpts from family-centered care for children needing specialized health and developmental services. Pediatric nurse, 21, 362–364.
  • Smith, A. 2016. Conductive education: the unfinished story, Special World. April 2006.
  • Smith, D.E., 1987. The everyday world as problematic. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
  • Smith, D.E., 1990a. Texts, facts and feminity: exploring the relations of ruling. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Smith, D.E., 1990b. The conceptual practices of power. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
  • Smith, D.E., 1999. Writing the social: critique, theory and investigations. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
  • Smith, D.E., 2005. Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
  • Smith, E., 2006. Institutional ethnography as practice Maryland. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Smith, J., et al., 2013. The implementation of conductive education in the treatment of a five year old girl with cerebral palsy: a case report. Journal of the national society of allied health, Spring-Summer, 49.
  • Sutton, A., 2002. Alternative practice: alternative perspectives. Educational and child psychology, 19 (2), 107–116.
  • Sutton, A. 2016. Conductive Education: the unfinished story. Special World 5th April 2016
  • Taylor, M. and Emery, R., 1995. Knowledge of conductive education among health service professionals. European journal of special needs education, 10 (2), 169–179. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0885625950100208
  • Tuersley‐Dixon, L. and Frederickson, L., 2010. Conductive education: appraising the evidence. Educational psychology in practice, 26 (4), 353–373. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2010.521309
  • United Nations (UN) General Assembly, 1989. Adoption of a convention on the rights of the child (UN Doc.A/Res/44/25). New York: UN General Assembly.
  • Walby, K.T., 2013. Institutional ethnography and data analysis: making sense of data dialogues. International journal of social research methodology, 16 (2), 141–154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2012.661207
  • Wilson, A. and Pence, E., 2005. U.S. Legal Interventions in the lives of battered women. In: E. Smith, ed.. Institutional ethnography as practice Maryland. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 119–225.
  • Wilson, J., 2001. Conductive education and the national curriculum: an integrated approach. Support for Learning, 16 (4), 168–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.00213
  • World Health Organization, 2007. ICF-CY. International classification of functioning, disability and health: children and youth version. Geneva: WHO.
  • Wright, F.V., Boschen, K., and Jutai, J., 2005. Exploring the comparative responsiveness of a core set of outcome measures in a school-based conductive education programme. Child: care, health and development, 31 (3), 291–302.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.