“They don’t need to know that.’ focus groups as a model for teacher-led research and curriculum consultation

References

• Allen, R.E.S. and Wiles, J. 2016. A rose by any other name: participants choosing research pseudonyms. Qualitative research in psychology. 13 (2): 149–165. doi:10.1080/14780887.2015.1133746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroutsis, A., McGregor, G., and Mills, M. 2016. Pedagogic voice in teaching and engagement pedagogies’. Pedagogy, culture and society. 24 (1): 123–140. doi: 10.1080/14681366.2015.1087044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, L. and Nutt, L. 2012. Divided loyalties, divided expectations: research ethics, professional and occupational responsibilities. In: T. Miller et al., ed. Ethics in qualitative research. 2nd London: Sage. 76–93.
   Google Scholar
• British Educational Research Association (BERA) 2011. Ethical guidelines for educational research. Available at: https://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/BERA-Ethical-Guidelines-2011.pdf (Accessed: 31 July 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Browne, A.L. 2016. Can people talk together about their practices? focus groups, humour and the sensitive dynamics of everyday life. Area. 48 (2): 198–205. doi:10.1111/area.12250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Channel 4 Learning UK. 2009. All about us: living and growing [DVD]. UK: Channel 4 Learning UK.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, P. and Prout, A. 2002. Working with ethical symmetry in social research with children. Childhood. 9 (4): 477–497. doi:10.1177/0907568202009004007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colucci, E. 2007. Focus groups can be fun”: the use of activity-oriented questions in focus group discussions. Qualitative Health Research. 17 (10): 1422–1433. doi:10.1177/1049732307308129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. 2006. Sound, presence and power: “student voice” in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry. 36 (4): 359–390. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00363.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin Dwyer, S. and Buckle, J. 2009. The space between: one being and insider-outsider in qualitative research. International journal of qualitative methodology. 8 (1): 54–63. doi:10.1177/160940690900800105
   Google Scholar
• Corsaro, W.A. 2011. The sociology of childhood. 3rd. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• David, M., Edwards, R., and Alldred, P. 2001. Children and school-based research: ‘informed consent’ or educated consent. British educational research journal. 27 (3): 347–365. doi:10.1080/01411920120048340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE), 2019. Relationships Education, Relationships and Sex Education (RSE) and health education: statutory guidance for governing bodies, proprietors, head teachers, principals, senior leadership teams, teachers. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/805781/Relationships_Education__Relationships_and_Sex_Education__RSE__and_Health_Education.pdf (Accessed 6 September 2019).
   Google Scholar
• DfE. 2020. Guidance: implementation of relationships education, relationships and sex education and health education 2020 to 2021, 9 July. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/relationships-education-relationships-and-sex-education-rse-and-health-education/implementation-of-relationships-education-relationships-and-sex-education-and-health-education-2020-to-2021 (Accessed: 28 October 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Duggleby, W. 2005. What about focus group interaction data? Qualitative health research. 15 (6): 832–840. doi:10.1177/1049732304273916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, R.D. and Mauthner, M. 2012. Ethics and feminist research: theory and practice. In: T. Miller, T et al., ed. Ethics in qualitative research. 2nd New York: Routledge. 14–28.
   Google Scholar
• Forster, C. and Eperjesi, R. 2017. Action research for new teachers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Halstead, J.M. and Reiss, M.J. 2003. Values in sex education: from principles to practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Halstead, J.M. and Waite, S. 2001. Living in different worlds”: gender differences in the developing sexual values and attitudes of primary school children. Sex education. 1 (1): 56–87. doi:10.1080/14681810120041724
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, H. 2001. Teacher/researchers in early childhood: ethical responsibilities to children. Networks: an online journal for teacher research. 4 (2): doi:10.4148/2470-6353-1206
   Google Scholar
• Hertz, R. 1996. Introduction: ethics, reflexivity and voice. Qualitative sociology. 19 (1): 3–9. doi:10.1007/BF02393245
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M., Laybourn, A., and Borland, M. 1996. Engaging with primary-aged children about their emotions and well-being: methodological considerations. Children and society. 10 (2): 129–144. doi:10.1111/j/1099.0860.1996.tb00463.x
   Google Scholar
• Keddie, A. 2004. Research with young children: the use of an affinity group approach to explore the social dynamics of peer culture. British journal of sociology of education. 25 (1): 35–51. doi:10.1080/0142569032000155926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. 1994. The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of health & illness. 16 (1): 103–121. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotecha, S., 2019. LGBT schools row: equality teaching to return to parkfield, BBC News, 3 July. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-48853462 (Accessed: 30 September 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Labaree, D.F. 2003. The peculiar problems of preparing educational researchers. Educational researcher. 32 (4): 13–22. doi:10.3102/0013189X032004013
   Google Scholar
• Leavy, P.L., 2007. The practice of feminist oral history and focus group interviews. In: S.N. Hesse-Biber and P.L. Leavy, eds. Feminist research practice: p primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 149–186.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, K.A. and Luke, K. 2010. Gender differences in the ABC’s of the birds and the bees: what mothers teach young children about sexuality and reproduction. Sex roles. 62 (3–4): 278–291. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9731-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauthner, M. 1997. Methodological aspects of collecting data from children: lessons from three research projects. Children and society. 11 (1): 16–28. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.1997.tb00003.x
   Google Scholar
• Mayall, B. 2002. Towards a sociology for childhood: thinking from children’s lives. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDermid, F., et al. 2014. Conducting qualitative research in the context of pre-existing peer and collegial relationships. Nurse researcher. 21 (5): 28–33. doi:10.7748/nr.21.5.28.e1232
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Naples, N. 1996. A feminist revisiting of the insider/outsider debate: the “outsider” phenomenon in rural Idaho. Qualitative sociology. 19 (1): 83–106. doi:10.1007/BF02393249
   Google Scholar
• Parveen, N., 2019. Protests resume against LGBT lessons at Birmingham primary school, The Guardian, 9 July. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jul/09/protests-against-lgbt-lessons-in-birmingham-primary-school-resume (Accessed: 6 September 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Phelan, S.K. and Kinsella, E.A. 2013. Picture this … safety, dignity and voice – ethical research with children: practical considerations for the reflexive researcher. Qualitative Inquiry. 19 (2): 81–90. doi:10.1177/1077800412462987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, R.A. and Single, H.M. 1996. Focus Groups. International journal for quality in healthcare. 8 (5): 499–504. doi:10.1093/intqhc/8.5.499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PSHE Association, 2019. Government takes ‘major step’ towards better PSHE for all, July 18. Available at: https://www.pshe-association.org.uk/news/government-takes-%E2%80%98major-step%E2%80%99-towards-better-pshe (Accessed: 6 September 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Reed, J. and Payton, V.R., 1997. Focus groups: issues of analysis and interpretation. Journal of advanced nursing, 26, 765–771. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.00395.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renold, E. 2005. Girls, boys and junior sexualities: exploring children’s gender and sexual relations in the primary school. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, K.H., et al. 2017. Responsibilities, tensions and he ways forward: parents’ perspectives on children’s sexuality education. Sex education. 17 (3): 333–347. doi:10.1080/14681811.2017.1301904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagor, R.D. and Williams, C. 2016. The action research guidebook: a process of pursuing equity and excellence in education. 3rd. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, J. 2000. Using and analysing focus groups: limitations and possibilities. International journal of social research methodology. 3 (2): 103–119. doi:10.1080/136455700405172
   Google Scholar
• The Christopher Winter Project. 2009. Teaching SRE with confidence in primary schools: lesson plans and resources for Years 1 - 6 [CD ROM]. London: The Christopher Winter Project.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne, B. 1987. Re-visioning women and social change: where are the children? Gender and society. 1 (1): 85–109. doi:10.1177/089124387001001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne, B. 1993. Gender play: girls and boys in school. New Brunsick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Unicef, 1989. The United Nations convention on the rights of the child. Available at: https://downloads.unicef.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/unicef-convention-rights-child-uncrc.pdf?_adal_sd=www.unicef.org.uk.1597397719690&_adal_ca=so%3DGoogle%26me%3Dorganic%26ca%3D(not%2520set)%26co%3D(not%2520set)%26ke%3D(not%2520set).1597397719690&_adal_cw=1597397303403.1597397719690&_adal_id=13ab5b40-2c6a-4cee-b2f0-e328d54fd995.1597397303.2.1597397303.1597397303.9216be1e-3b05-4308-a34d-4a86884f473c.1597397719690&_ga=2.83674002.560598353.1597397302-1880009322.1597397302 (Accesses: 14 August 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Walford, G. 2018. The impossibility of anonymity in ethnographic research. Qualitative research. 18 (5): 516–525. doi:10.1177/1468794118778606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen, F. 2004. It was fun … I liked drawing my thoughts”: using drawings as part of the focus group process with children. Journal of leisure research. 36 (4): 461–482. doi:10.10808/00222216.2004.11950032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar