‘Curiouser and curiouser!’: a reconnaissance of my doctoral study as a ‘teacher-researcher’

References

• Akerson, V.L. and Hanuscin, D.L., 2007. Teaching nature of science through inquiry: results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of research in science teaching, 44 (5), 653–680. doi:10.1002/tea.20159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R.D., 2002. Reforming science teaching: what research says about inquiry. Journal of science teacher education, 13 (1), 1–12. doi:10.1023/A:1015171124982.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. and Harrison, C., 2001. Feedback in questioning and marking: the science teacher’s role in formative assessment. School science review, 82 (301), 55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., and Cocking, R.R., 1999. How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press. doi:10.17226/9853
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, L., 1865. Alice’s adventures in wonderland. London: Macmillan & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Chamely-Wiik, D.M., et al., 2014. SQER3: an instructional framework for using scientific inquiry to design classroom demonstrations. Journal of chemical education, 91 (3), 329–335. doi:10.1021/ed300689n.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colburn, A., 2008. The prepared practitioner: making inquiry successful. The science teacher, 75 (9), 12.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L.M., 2009. Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational researcher, 38 (3), 181–199. doi:10.3102/2F0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickerson, C., et al., 2018. Changing practice in Malaysian primary schools: learning from student teachers’ reports of using action, reflection and modelling (ARM). Journal of education for teaching, 44 (2), 194–211. doi:10.1080/02607476.2018.1433468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, P., 2008. Reconnaissance as an unconsidered component of action research. ALAR: action learning and action research journal, 13 (1), 4–17.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, J., 1991. Action research for educational change. Bristol: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Freiberg, H. and Driscoll, A., 1996. Universal teaching strategies. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Garner-O’Neale, L., Maughan, J., and Ogunkola, B., 2014. Scientific literacy of undergraduate chemistry students in the University of the West Indies, Barbados: individual and joint contributions of age, sex and level of study. International letters of social and humanistic sciences, 3 (10), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.13.41.
   Google Scholar
• Goldston, M.J., et al., 2013. A psychometric approach to the development of a 5e lesson plan scoring instrument for inquiry-based teaching. Journal of science teacher education, 24 (3), 527–551. doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9327-7.
   Google Scholar
• Grigg, J., et al., 2013. Effects of two scientific inquiry professional development interventions on teaching practice. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 35 (1), 38–56. doi:10.3102/2F0162373712461851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1972. Knowledge and human interests. J.J. Shapiro), trans. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Hanauer, D.I., Hatfull, G.F., and Jacobs-Sera, D., 2009. Active assessment: assessing scientific inquiry. New York: Springer, Vol. 2. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-89649-6.
   Google Scholar
• Heng, L.L., Surif, J., and Seng, C.H., 2015. Malaysian students’ scientific argumentation: do groups perform better than individuals? International journal of science education, 37 (3), 505–528. doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.995147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herron, M.D., 1971. The nature of scientific enquiry. School review, 79 (2), 171–212. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1084259 Accessed 27 08 2021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A. and Lunetta, V.N., 2004. The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Science education, 88 (1), 28–54. doi:10.1002/sce.10106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huziak-Clark, T., et al., 2007. Using inquiry to improve pedagogy through K-12/university partnerships. School science and mathematics, 107 (8), 311–324. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2007.tb17796.x.
   Google Scholar
• Jeanpierre, B., Oberhauser, K., and Freeman, C., 2005. Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teachers’ classroom practices. Journal of research in science teaching, 42 (6), 668–690. doi:10.1002/tea.20069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., 2006. Participatory action research and the public sphere. educational action research, 14 (4), 459–476. doi:10.1080/09650790600975593.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R., 1988. The action research planner. 3rd. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., and Nixon, R., 2014. The action research planner: doing critical participatory action research. Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
   Google Scholar
• Keys, C.W. and Bryan, L.A., 2001. Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: essential research for lasting reform. Journal of research in science teaching, 38 (6), 631–645. doi:10.1002/tea.1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluge, A., 2014. Combining laboratory experiments with digital tools to do scientific inquiry. International journal of science education, 36 (13), 2157–2179. doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.916456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, J.S., et al., 2014. Meaningful assessment of learners’ understandings about scientific inquiry – the views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of research in science teaching, 51 (1), 65–83. doi:10.1002/tea.21125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N.G., Lederman, J.S., and Antink, A., 2013. Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International journal of education in mathematics, science and technology, 1 (3), 138–147.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, H., et al., 2013. The impact of collaborative reflections on teachers’ inquiry teaching. International journal of science education, 35 (18), 3095–3116. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.689023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, M.C. and Hsi, S., 2000. Computers, teachers, peers: science learning partners. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781410605917
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J.J., 2002. Effective reflective practice: in search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of teacher education, 53 (1), 33–43. doi:10.1177/2F0022487102053001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumpe, A.T. and Oliver, J.S., 1991. Dimensions of hands-on science. American Biology Teacher, 53 (6), 345–348. doi:10.2307/4449322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, T., 1999. Is reflective practice synonymous with action research? Educational Action Research, 7 (1), 163–169. doi:10.1080/09650799900200080.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, J., 2016. You and your action research project. 4th. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315693620.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, J., 2017. Action research: all you need to know. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education Malaysia [MOE], 2018. Standard curriculum and assessment document (DSKP): science year four. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Mohd Salleh, N. and Mat Noor, M.S.A., 2015. Improving the quality of pupils’ response in science inquiry teaching: a participatory action research. Procedia – social and behavioral sciences, 191, 1310–1316. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.482
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A.W., 2010. Improving teacher questioning in science inquiry discussions through professional development. Journal of research in science teaching, 47 (4), 422–453. doi:10.1002/tea.20345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodney L, D., 1990. What research says … about assessment. Science and children, 27 (8), 26–27.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, S. and Frazier, R., 2008. Place-based investigations and authentic inquiry. Science teacher, 75 (2), 29–33.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D., 1987. Educating the reflective practitioner: towards a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R.S. and Crawford, B.A., 2004. Authentic scientific inquiry as context for teaching nature of science: identifying critical element for success. In: L.B. Flick and N.G. Lederman, eds. Scientific inquiry and nature of science: implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education. Dordrecht: Springer, 331–335. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5814-1_16.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, A., Ed. 2010. Oxford dictionary of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, E.M., 2014. Guiding students to develop an understanding of scientific inquiry: a science skills approach to instruction and assessment. CBE life science education, 13 (1), 90–101. doi:10.1187/cbe-12-11-0198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strangis, D.E., Pringle, R.M., and Knopf, H.T., 2006. Road map or roadblock? Science lesson planning and preservice teachers. Action in teacher education, 28 (1), 73–84. doi:10.1080/01626620.2006.10463568.
   Google Scholar
• van Manen, M., 1995. On the epistemology of reflective practice. Teachers and teaching: theory and practice, 1 (1), 33–50. doi:10.1080/1354060950010104.
   Google Scholar
• van Zee, E.H., et al., 2005. Learning and teaching science as inquiry: a case study of elementary school teachers’ investigations of light. Science education, 89 (6), 1007–1042. doi:10.1002/sce.20084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waight, N. and Abd-El-Khalick, F., 2011. From scientific practice to high school science classrooms: transfer of scientific technologies and realizations of authentic inquiry. Journal of research in science teaching, 48 (1), 37–70. doi:10.1002/tea.20393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, T. and Molnar, T., 2014. Can experiences of authentic scientific inquiry result in transformational learning? Journal of transformative education, 11 (4), 229–245. doi:10.1177/2F1541344614538522
   Google Scholar