Reimagining the language of disability and inclusion in primary teacher education through a translanguaging framework

References

• Abberley, P., 1987. The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability. Disability, handicap & society, 2 (1), 5–19. doi:10.1080/02674648766780021.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, P., 2018. How the rights of all school students and teachers are affected by special educational needs or disability (SEND) services: teaching, psychology, policy. London review of education, 16 (2), 175–190. doi:10.18546/LRE.16.2.01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algraigray, H. and Boyle, C., 2017. The SEN label and its effect on special education. Educational and child psychologist, 34 (4), 70–79. doi:10.53841/bpsecp.2017.34.4.70.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, J. and Martin, P., 2006. Accomplishing lessons in postcolonial classrooms: comparative perspectives from Botswana and Brunei darussalam. Comparative education, 42 (2), 177–202. doi:10.1080/03050060600628009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, R.C. and Tyyskä, V., 2011. A critical reflection on the use of translators/interpreters in a qualitative cross-language research project. International journal of qualitative methods, 10 (2), 178–190. doi:10.1177/160940691101000206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn, B., et al. 2022. Towards an ecological model of inclusive practice for children with special educational needs in Vietnam: perceptions of primary school teachers. Practice: Contemporary issues in practitioner education, 4 (3), 239–260. doi:10.1080/25783858.2022.2147017.
   Google Scholar
• Blackledge, A. and Creese, A., 2017. Translanguaging and the body. International journal of multilingualism, 14 (3), 250–268. doi:10.1080/14790718.2017.1315809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U., 1979. The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, C., et al. 2008. Further towards an affirmation model. In: T. Campbell, ed. Disability studies: emerging insights and perspectives. Leeds: The Disability Press, 14–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey-Moody, A. and Haworth, R. 2009. Affective literacies. In: D. Masny and D.R. Cole, eds. Multiple literacies theory: a deleuzian perspective. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. 79–91.10.1163/9789087909116_007.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, N., Wigelsworth, M., Barlow, A., and Squires, G. 2013. The role of school and individual differences in the academic attainment of learners with special educational needs and disabilities: A multi-level analysis. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17 (9), 909–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, T.W., 2014. Emotion in languaging: languaging as affective, adaptive, and flexible behavior in social interaction. Frontiers in psychology, 5 (720), 1–14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00720.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kendall, A. and Puttick, M.R., 2020. Reading ourselves against the grain: starting points for parental engagement with newly arrived families. Practice: Contemporary issues in practitioner education, 2 (1), 33–49. doi:10.1080/25783858.2020.1732633.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, G., Wedell, K., and Dockrell, J., 2020. Warnock 40 years on: the development of special educational needs since the Warnock Report and implications for the future. Frontiers in Education, 4 (164), 1–20. January doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00164
   Google Scholar
• Lorimer-Leonard, R.2017.Writing on the move: migrant women and the value of literacyPittsburgh:University of Pittsburgh Press.10.2307/j.ctt1ztdw0r
   Google Scholar
• Merry, M.S., 2020. Do inclusion policies deliver educational justice for children with autism? An ethical analysis. Journal of school choice, 14 (1), 9–25. doi:10.1080/15582159.2019.1644126.
   Google Scholar
• Nikander, P., 2008. Working with transcripts and translated data. Qualitative research in psychology, 5 (3), 225–231. doi:10.1080/14780880802314346.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M.1996.Understanding disabilityLondon:Palgrave.10.1007/978-1-349-24269-6
   Google Scholar
• Page, J., 2018. Characterising the principles of professional love in early childhood care and education. International journal of early years education, 26 (2), 125–141. doi:10.1080/09669760.2018.1459508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagliano, P.2017.Multisensory environmentsLondon:Routledge.10.4324/9781315831053
   Google Scholar
• Paseka, A. and Schwab, S., 2020. Parents’ attitudes towards inclusive education and their perceptions of inclusive teaching practices and resources. European journal of special needs education, 35 (2), 254–272. doi:10.1080/08856257.2019.1665232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price-Mitchell, M., 2009. Boundary dynamics: implications for building parent-school partnerships. School community journal, 19 (2), 9–26.
   Google Scholar
• Puttick, M.-R., 2021. Reimagining family literacy: co-creating pedagogies with migrating mothers in third sector spaces. Unpublished PhD thesis, Birmingham City University.
   Google Scholar
• Report, W. (1978). Special Educational Needs. Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Education of Handicapped Children and Young People. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Rymes, B. 2010. Classroom discourse analysis: a focus on communicative repertoires. In: N.H. Hornberger and S.L. McKay, eds. Sociolinguistics and language education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 528–546.10.21832/9781847692849-021.
   Google Scholar
• Rymes, B., 2014a. Communicative Repertoire. In: C. Leung and B.V. Street, eds. The Routledge companion to English studies. Oxon and NY: Routledge, 287–301.
   Google Scholar
• Rymes, B., 2014b. Communicating Beyond Language. Everyday Encounters with Diversity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scotch, R.K. and Schriner, K., 1997. Disability as human variation: implications for policy. The annals of the American Academy of political and social science, 549 (1), 148–159. doi:10.1177/0002716297549001011.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehy, K., et al., 2013. Conceptualising inclusive pedagogies: evidence from international research and the challenge of autistic spectrum disorder. Erdelyi pszichologiai szemle (Transylvanian journal of psychology), 14 (1), 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M., 2006. Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In: H. Byrnes, ed. Advanced language learning: the contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky. London: Continuum, 95–108.
   Google Scholar
• Temple, B. and Edwards, R., 2002. Interpreters/Translators and cross-language research: reflexivity and border crossings. International journal of qualitative methods, 1 (2), 1–12. doi:10.1177/160940690200100201.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund, 1989. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. London: UNICEF UK. Available from: http://www.unicef.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/UNCRC_united_nations_convention_on_the_rights_of_the_child.pdf [Accessed 19 July 2022]. ()
   Google Scholar
• Walton, E., 2015. The language of inclusive education: exploring speaking, listening, reading and writing. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation, 2022. Disability. World Health Organisation. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/disability#tab=tab_1 [Accessed 2 August 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Young, H., Fenwick, M., Lambe, L. and Hogg, J., 2011. Multi‐sensory storytelling as an aid to assisting people with profound intellectual disabilities to cope with sensitive issues: A multiple research methods analysis of engagement and outcomes. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 26 (2),127–142.
   Google Scholar