Teachers’ classroom practices to achieve integration of content and language in CLIL

References

• Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of blooms taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bertaux, P., Coonan, C. M., Frigols-Martín, M. J., & Mehisto, P. (2010). The CLIL teacher’s competences grid. http://tplusm.net/CLIL_Competences_Grid_31.12.09.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Cabezuelo, P., & Fernández, R. F. (2014). A case study on teacher training needs in the Madrid bilingual project. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 7(2), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2014.7.2.3
   Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2013). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. (2000). Meeting the challenge: developing the 3Cs curriculum. In S. Green (Eds.), New perspectives on teaching and learning modern languages (pp. 158–182). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. (2008). CLIL—A pedagogical approach from the European perspective. In N. H. Hornberger (Eds), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 1200–1214). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_92
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., Halbach, A., Meyer, O., & Schuck, K. (2018). Knowledge ecology for conceptual growth: Teachers as active agents in developing a pluriliteracies approach to teaching for learning (PTL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1387516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire (Vol. 23). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Custodio-Espinar, M., & García-Ramos, J. M. (2020). Are accredited teachers equally trained for CLIL? The CLIL teacher paradox. Porta Linguarum, 33, 9–25. http://hdl.handle.net/10481/62800
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. (2004). Academic language functions in content and language integrated classrooms: defining and hypothesizing. Views–Vienna English Working Papers,13, 23–48.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. (2008). Outcomes and processes in content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Current research from Europe. In Delanoy & Volkmann (Eds.), Future perspectives for English language teaching (pp. 139–157). Carl Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. (2013). A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualising content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 216–253. https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2013-0011
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T., & Smit, U. (2010). Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (Vol. 7). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Echevarria, J., & Short, D. J. (2000). Using multiple perspectives in observations of diverse classrooms: The sheltered instruction observation protocol (SIOP) [Conference paper]. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Echevarria, J., Vogt, M., & Short, D. J. (2013). Making content comprehensible for English learners. The SIOP model. Pearson Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst-Slavit, G., & Mason, M. R. (2011). “Words that hold us up:” Teacher talk and academic language in five upper elementary classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 22(4), 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.04.004
   Google Scholar
• Fernández Fontecha, A. (2009). Spanish CLIL: Research and official actions. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, and R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 3–21). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, R., & Halbach, A. (2011). Analysing the situation of teachers in the Madrid bilingual project after four years of implementation. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, F. Gallardo del Puerto and J. M. Sierra (Eds.), Content and foreign language integrated learning. contributions to multilingualism in European contexts (pp. 241–270). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, R., Pena Díaz, C., García Gómez, A., & Halbach, A. (2005). La implantación de proyectos educativos bilingües en la Comunidad de Madrid: Las expectativas del profesorado antes de iniciar el proyecto. Porta Linguarum, 3, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.29128
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, T. W., Tedick, D. J., & Walker, C. L. (2008). Integrated language and content teaching: Insights from the language immersion classroom: Evolving perspectives on immersion education. In T. W. Fortune, & D. J. Tedick (Eds.), Pathways to multilingualism: Evolving perspectives on immersion education (pp. 71–96). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Karabassova, L. (2018). Teachers’ conceptualization of content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Evidence from a trilingual context. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1550048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopman, G. J., Skeet, J., & De Graaff, R. (2014). Exploring content teachers’ knowledge of language pedagogy: A report on a small-scale research project in a dutch CLIL context. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.889974
   Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D., & Ruiz De Zarobe, Y. (2010). Ways forward in CLIL: Provision issues and future planning. In D. Lasagabaster & Y. Ruiz De Zarobe (Eds.), CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training (pp. 278–295). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Llinares, A. (2015). Integration in CLIL: A proposal to inform research and successful pedagogy. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llinares, A., & Dalton-Puffer, C. (2015). The role of different tasks in CLIL students’ use of evaluative language. System, 54, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Llinares García, A., & Whittaker, R. (2006). Oral and written production in social science. Vienna English Working Papers, 15(3), 28–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach (Vol. 18). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., Mehisto, P., Wolff, D., & Frigols Martín, M. J. (2011). European framework for CLIL teacher education. Council of Europe Publishing. https://www.ecml.at/Resources/ECMLPublications/tabid/277/ID/35/language/en-GB/Default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL. Content and language integrated learning in bilingual and multilingual education. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, O. (2010). Introducing the CLIL-pyramid: Key strategies and principles for quality CLIL planning and teaching. In M. Eisenmann & T. Summer (Eds.), Basic issues in EFL-teaching and learning (pp. 295–313). Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, O., Coyle, D., Halbach, A., Schuck, K., & Ting, T. (2015). A pluriliteracies approach to content and language integrated learning–mapping learner progressions in knowledge construction and meaning-making. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moate, J. (2010). The integrated nature of CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(3), 30–37. https://www.unifg.it/sites/default/files/allegatiparagrafo/21-01-2014/moate_the_integrated_nature_of_clil.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. (2012). Classroom talk, conceptual change and teacher reflection in bilingual science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, T. (2018). Reconceptualizing and describing teachers’ knowledge of language for content and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1383352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navés, T. (2009). Effective content and language integrated learning (CLIL) programmes. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, and R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (22–40). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Nikula, T., Dafouz, E., Moore, P., & Smit, U. (Eds.). (2016). Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education. Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, A., & San Isidro, X. (2019). Language as the articulator of a CLIL ecosystem: The Spanish case. Revista Nebrija De Lingüística Aplicada a La Enseñanza De Lenguas, 13(27), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.26378/rnlael1327338
   Google Scholar
• Pavón, V., & Ellison, M. (2013). Examining teachers roles and competences in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Linguarum Arena, 4(1), 65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.630064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2016). Are teachers ready for CLIL? Evidence from a European study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1138104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phipps, S., & Borg, S. (2009). Exploring tensions between teachers’ grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System, 37(3), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz De Zarobe, Y., & Cenoz, J. (2015). Way forward in the twenty-first century in content-based instruction: Moving towards integration. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuitemaker-King, J. (2012). Teachers’ strategies in providing opportunities for second language development [ Doctoral dissertation], University of Groningen: s.n.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, C. L., & Tedick, D. J. (2000). The complexity of immersion education: Teachers address the issues. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar