Foreign ideology vs. national priority: impacts of the US Global Gag Rule on Nepal’s sexual and reproductive healthcare system

References

• Shakya G, Kishore S, Bird C, et al. Abortion law reform in Nepal: women’s right to life and health. Reprod Health Matters. 2004;12:75–84. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(04)24007-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fact Sheet: Abortion in Asia [Internet]. Guttmacher Institute; 2018. [cited 2020 Mar 24]. Available from: https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/abortion-asia
   Google Scholar
• Samandari G, Wolf M, Basnett I, et al. Implementation of legal abortion in Nepal: a model for rapid scale-up of high-quality care. Reprod Health. 2012;9:7. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-9-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millennium Development Goals [Internet]. UNDP Nepal. [cited 2020 Mar 24]. Available from: https://www.np.undp.org/content/nepal/en/home/post-2015/mdgoverview.html
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health Nepal, New Era, ICF. Nepal demographic and health survey 2016. Ministry of Health Nepal; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Målqvist M, Hultstrand J, Larsson M, et al. High levels of unmet need for family planning in Nepal. Sex Reprod Healthc Off J Swed Assoc Midwives. 2018;17:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2018.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Population Action International (PAI). The interpretation that vastly extended the harm of the global gag rule [Internet]. PAI; 2019. [cited 2020 Mar 11]. Available from: https://pai.org/data-and-maps/the-interpretation-that-vastly-extended-the-harm-of-the-global-gag-rule/
   Google Scholar
• Health and Human Services – Standard Provision. Protecting life in global health assistance [Internet]; 2017. Available from: https://grants.nih.gov/sites/default/files/HHS%20Standard%20%20Provision_ProtectingLifeinGlobalAssistance_HHS_May%202017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kates J, Moss K. What is the scope of the Mexico City policy: assessing abortion laws in countries that receive U.S. global health assistance [Internet]. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2017. [cited 2020 Mar 24]. Available from: https://www.kff.org/global-health-policy/issue-brief/what-is-the-scope-of-the-mexico-city-policy-assessing-abortion-laws-in-countries-that-receive-u-s-global-health-assistance/
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Creditor reporting system (CRS) [Internet]. OECD.Stat. Available from: https://stats.oecd.org/
   Google Scholar
• Explore View U.S. Foreign Assistance on a Global Map [Internet]. [cited 2020 Sep 21]. Available from: https://foreignassistance.gov/explore
   Google Scholar
• Wu W-J, Maru S, Regmi K, et al. Abortion care in Nepal, 15 years after legalization. Health Hum Rights. 2017;19:221–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell SO, Zimmerman L, Choi Y, et al. Legal but limited? Abortion service availability and readiness assessment in Nepal. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33:99–106. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puri M, Singh S, Sundaram A, et al. Abortion Incidence and unintended pregnancy in Nepal. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016;42:197–209. doi: 10.1363/42e2116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhary D. The decentralization, devolution and local governance practices in Nepal: the emerging challenges and concerns. J Polit Sci. 2019;19:43–64. doi: 10.3126/jps.v19i0.26698
   Google Scholar
• Population Action International. Access denied: Nepal – preliminary impacts of Trump’s expanded Global Gag Rule. PAI; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks N, Bendavid E, Miller G. USA aid policy and induced abortion in Sub-Saharan Africa: an analysis of the Mexico City policy. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7:e1046–e1053. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30267-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendavid E, Avila P, Miller G. United States aid policy and induced abortion in Sub-Saharan Africa. Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89:873–880C. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.091660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers Y. The Global Gag Rule and women’s reproductive health: rhetoric versus reality [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2018. Available from: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=GM90DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&ots=2OzRkvVwPB&sig=3yw1FDi0wYKb3fZEQ9Stn1ZmuhA
   Google Scholar
• Schaaf M, Maistrellis E, Thomas H, et al. ‘Protecting life in global health assistance’? Towards a framework for assessing the health systems impact of the expanded Global Gag Rule. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4:e001786. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones KM. Evaluating the Mexico City policy: how US foreign policy affects fertility outcomes and child health in Ghana [Internet]. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); 2011. [cited 2020 Jul 24]. Report No.: 1147. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/ifprid/1147.html
   Google Scholar
• Jones KM. Contraceptive supply and fertility outcomes: evidence from Ghana. Econ Dev Cult Change. 2015;64:31–69. doi: 10.1086/682981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Health and Gender Equity. Prescribing chaos in global health: the Global Gag Rule from 1984–2018; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• amfAR The Foundation for AIDS Research. The effect of the expanded Mexico City policy on HIV/AIDS programming: evidence from the PEPFAR implementing partners survey [Internet]. 2019. [cited 2020 Mar 11]. Available from: https://www.amfar.org/issue-brief-the-effect-of-the-expanded-mexico-city-policy/
   Google Scholar
• Giorgio M, Makumbi F, Kibira SPS, et al. Investigating the early impact of the Trump administration’s Global Gag Rule on sexual and reproductive health service delivery in Uganda. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0231960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Population Action International (PAI). Access denied: the impact of the Global Gag Rule in Nepal 2006 updates [Internet]. PAI; 2006. Available from: http://pai.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Access-Denied-The-Impact-of-the-Global-Gag-Rule-in-Nepal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Center for Reproductive Rights. Breaking the silence: the Global Gag Rule’s impact on unsafe abortion. The Center for Reproductive Rights; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• International Women’s Health Coalition. Crisis in care: year two impact of Trump’s Global Gag Rule [Internet]. Available from: https://iwhc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/IWHC_GGR_Report_2019-WEB_single_pg.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF). Policy briefing: the GGR and its impacts [Internet]. IPPF; 2017. Available from: https://www.ippf.org/sites/default/files/2017-08/IPPF%20GGR%20Policy%20Briefing%20No.1%20-%20August%202017_3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fact Sheet: Family Planning Service Strengthening Program (FPSSP) [Internet]. USAID; 2015. [cited 2020 Mar 24]. Available from: https://2012-2017.usaid.gov/nepal/fact-sheets/family-planning-service-strengthening-program-fpssp
   Google Scholar
• The Global Fund Office of the Inspector General. Global fund grants in Nepal [Internet]. The Global Fund; 2019. Available from: https://www.theglobalfund.org/media/8680/oig_gf-oig-19-015_report_en.pdf?u=637278310860000000
   Google Scholar
• amfAR:: Issue Brief. The expanded Mexico City policy – implications for the global Fund. The Foundation for AIDS Research:: HIV/AIDS Research [Internet]. [cited 2020 Jan 13]. Available from: https://www.amfar.org/emcp/
   Google Scholar
• Family Planning 2020 (FP2020). Nepal FP2020 core indicator summary sheet: 2018–2019 annual progress report [Internet]; 2019. Available from: http://www.familyplanning2020.org/sites/default/files/Data-Hub/2019CI/Nepal_2019_CI_Handout.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Family Planning 2020 (FP2020), Kabita Aryal. FP2020 commitment update questionnaire 2018–2019 Nepal; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Puri M, Wagle K, Rios V, et al. Impacts of protecting life in global health assistance policy in Nepal in its third year of implementation [Internet]. CREHPA; 2020. Available from: http://crehpa.org.np/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/GGR-Impact_Report_May-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Puri M, Wagle K, Rios V, et al. Early impacts of the expanded Global Gag Rule in Nepal [Internet]. Kathmandu: CREHPA; 2019. Available from: http://crehpa.org.np/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Report_GGR-Early-Impacts-Nepal_March-08-2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rios V. Reality check: year one impact of Trump’s Global Gag Rule. International Women’s Health Coalition; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Guttmacher Institute. Adding it up: investing in contraception and maternal and newborn health for adolescents in Kenya, 2018 [Internet]; 2018. [cited 2020 Feb 3]. Available from: https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/adding-it-up-contraception-mnh-adolescents-kenya
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). WHO | preventing unsafe abortion [Internet]. WHO. [cited 2020 Jul 24]. Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/unsafe_abortion/hrpwork/en/
   Google Scholar
• Center for Health and Gender Equity. A powerful force: U.S. global health assistance and reproductive health and rights in Malawi [Internet]; 2020. Available from: http://www.genderhealth.org/files/uploads/change/publications/CHANGE_A_Powerful_Force_Malawi_February_2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Population Action International (PAI). Access denied: Senegal – preliminary impacts of Trump’s expanded Global Gag Rule [Internet]. PAI; 2018. Available from: https://pai.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Access-Denied-Senegal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Seevers RE. The politics of gagging: the effects of the Global Gag Rule on democratic participation and political advocacy in Peru. Brook J Int’l L. 2005;31:38.
   Google Scholar
• Thapa S. Abortion law in Nepal: the road to reform. Reprod Health Matters. 2004;12:85–94. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(04)24006-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Reproductive Rights. Forum for women, law and development (FWLD). Safe motherhood and reproductive health rights act [Internet]; 2018. Available from: https://reproductiverights.org/sites/default/files/2020-01/Safe%20Motherhood%20and%20Reproductive%20Health%20Rights%20Act%20in%20English.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Khatri RB, Poudel S, Ghimire PR. Factors associated with unsafe abortion practices in Nepal: pooled analysis of the 2011 and 2016 Nepal demographic and health surveys. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0223385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers C, Sapkota S, Paudel R, et al. Medical abortion in Nepal: a qualitative study on women’s experiences at safe abortion services and pharmacies. Reprod Health. 2019;16:105. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0755-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yogi A, Prakash KC, Neupane S. Prevalence and factors associated with abortion and unsafe abortion in Nepal: a nationwide cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:376. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2011-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar