References
- Shakya G, Kishore S, Bird C, et al. Abortion law reform in Nepal: women’s right to life and health. Reprod Health Matters. 2004;12:75–84. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(04)24007-1
- Fact Sheet: Abortion in Asia [Internet]. Guttmacher Institute; 2018. [cited 2020 Mar 24]. Available from: https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/abortion-asia
- Samandari G, Wolf M, Basnett I, et al. Implementation of legal abortion in Nepal: a model for rapid scale-up of high-quality care. Reprod Health. 2012;9:7. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-9-7
- Millennium Development Goals [Internet]. UNDP Nepal. [cited 2020 Mar 24]. Available from: https://www.np.undp.org/content/nepal/en/home/post-2015/mdgoverview.html
- Ministry of Health Nepal, New Era, ICF. Nepal demographic and health survey 2016. Ministry of Health Nepal; 2017.
- Målqvist M, Hultstrand J, Larsson M, et al. High levels of unmet need for family planning in Nepal. Sex Reprod Healthc Off J Swed Assoc Midwives. 2018;17:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2018.04.012
- Population Action International (PAI). The interpretation that vastly extended the harm of the global gag rule [Internet]. PAI; 2019. [cited 2020 Mar 11]. Available from: https://pai.org/data-and-maps/the-interpretation-that-vastly-extended-the-harm-of-the-global-gag-rule/
- Health and Human Services – Standard Provision. Protecting life in global health assistance [Internet]; 2017. Available from: https://grants.nih.gov/sites/default/files/HHS%20Standard%20%20Provision_ProtectingLifeinGlobalAssistance_HHS_May%202017.pdf
- Kates J, Moss K. What is the scope of the Mexico City policy: assessing abortion laws in countries that receive U.S. global health assistance [Internet]. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2017. [cited 2020 Mar 24]. Available from: https://www.kff.org/global-health-policy/issue-brief/what-is-the-scope-of-the-mexico-city-policy-assessing-abortion-laws-in-countries-that-receive-u-s-global-health-assistance/
- Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Creditor reporting system (CRS) [Internet]. OECD.Stat. Available from: https://stats.oecd.org/
- Explore View U.S. Foreign Assistance on a Global Map [Internet]. [cited 2020 Sep 21]. Available from: https://foreignassistance.gov/explore
- Wu W-J, Maru S, Regmi K, et al. Abortion care in Nepal, 15 years after legalization. Health Hum Rights. 2017;19:221–230.
- Bell SO, Zimmerman L, Choi Y, et al. Legal but limited? Abortion service availability and readiness assessment in Nepal. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33:99–106. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx149
- Puri M, Singh S, Sundaram A, et al. Abortion Incidence and unintended pregnancy in Nepal. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016;42:197–209. doi: 10.1363/42e2116
- Chaudhary D. The decentralization, devolution and local governance practices in Nepal: the emerging challenges and concerns. J Polit Sci. 2019;19:43–64. doi: 10.3126/jps.v19i0.26698
- Population Action International. Access denied: Nepal – preliminary impacts of Trump’s expanded Global Gag Rule. PAI; 2018.
- Brooks N, Bendavid E, Miller G. USA aid policy and induced abortion in Sub-Saharan Africa: an analysis of the Mexico City policy. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7:e1046–e1053. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30267-0
- Bendavid E, Avila P, Miller G. United States aid policy and induced abortion in Sub-Saharan Africa. Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89:873–880C. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.091660
- Rodgers Y. The Global Gag Rule and women’s reproductive health: rhetoric versus reality [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2018. Available from: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=GM90DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&ots=2OzRkvVwPB&sig=3yw1FDi0wYKb3fZEQ9Stn1ZmuhA
- Schaaf M, Maistrellis E, Thomas H, et al. ‘Protecting life in global health assistance’? Towards a framework for assessing the health systems impact of the expanded Global Gag Rule. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4:e001786. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001786
- Jones KM. Evaluating the Mexico City policy: how US foreign policy affects fertility outcomes and child health in Ghana [Internet]. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); 2011. [cited 2020 Jul 24]. Report No.: 1147. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/ifprid/1147.html
- Jones KM. Contraceptive supply and fertility outcomes: evidence from Ghana. Econ Dev Cult Change. 2015;64:31–69. doi: 10.1086/682981
- Center for Health and Gender Equity. Prescribing chaos in global health: the Global Gag Rule from 1984–2018; 2018.
- amfAR The Foundation for AIDS Research. The effect of the expanded Mexico City policy on HIV/AIDS programming: evidence from the PEPFAR implementing partners survey [Internet]. 2019. [cited 2020 Mar 11]. Available from: https://www.amfar.org/issue-brief-the-effect-of-the-expanded-mexico-city-policy/
- Giorgio M, Makumbi F, Kibira SPS, et al. Investigating the early impact of the Trump administration’s Global Gag Rule on sexual and reproductive health service delivery in Uganda. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0231960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231960
- Population Action International (PAI). Access denied: the impact of the Global Gag Rule in Nepal 2006 updates [Internet]. PAI; 2006. Available from: http://pai.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Access-Denied-The-Impact-of-the-Global-Gag-Rule-in-Nepal.pdf
- The Center for Reproductive Rights. Breaking the silence: the Global Gag Rule’s impact on unsafe abortion. The Center for Reproductive Rights; 2003.
- International Women’s Health Coalition. Crisis in care: year two impact of Trump’s Global Gag Rule [Internet]. Available from: https://iwhc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/IWHC_GGR_Report_2019-WEB_single_pg.pdf
- International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF). Policy briefing: the GGR and its impacts [Internet]. IPPF; 2017. Available from: https://www.ippf.org/sites/default/files/2017-08/IPPF%20GGR%20Policy%20Briefing%20No.1%20-%20August%202017_3.pdf
- Fact Sheet: Family Planning Service Strengthening Program (FPSSP) [Internet]. USAID; 2015. [cited 2020 Mar 24]. Available from: https://2012-2017.usaid.gov/nepal/fact-sheets/family-planning-service-strengthening-program-fpssp
- The Global Fund Office of the Inspector General. Global fund grants in Nepal [Internet]. The Global Fund; 2019. Available from: https://www.theglobalfund.org/media/8680/oig_gf-oig-19-015_report_en.pdf?u=637278310860000000
- amfAR:: Issue Brief. The expanded Mexico City policy – implications for the global Fund. The Foundation for AIDS Research:: HIV/AIDS Research [Internet]. [cited 2020 Jan 13]. Available from: https://www.amfar.org/emcp/
- Family Planning 2020 (FP2020). Nepal FP2020 core indicator summary sheet: 2018–2019 annual progress report [Internet]; 2019. Available from: http://www.familyplanning2020.org/sites/default/files/Data-Hub/2019CI/Nepal_2019_CI_Handout.pdf
- Family Planning 2020 (FP2020), Kabita Aryal. FP2020 commitment update questionnaire 2018–2019 Nepal; 2019.
- Puri M, Wagle K, Rios V, et al. Impacts of protecting life in global health assistance policy in Nepal in its third year of implementation [Internet]. CREHPA; 2020. Available from: http://crehpa.org.np/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/GGR-Impact_Report_May-2020.pdf
- Puri M, Wagle K, Rios V, et al. Early impacts of the expanded Global Gag Rule in Nepal [Internet]. Kathmandu: CREHPA; 2019. Available from: http://crehpa.org.np/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Report_GGR-Early-Impacts-Nepal_March-08-2019.pdf
- Rios V. Reality check: year one impact of Trump’s Global Gag Rule. International Women’s Health Coalition; 2018.
- Guttmacher Institute. Adding it up: investing in contraception and maternal and newborn health for adolescents in Kenya, 2018 [Internet]; 2018. [cited 2020 Feb 3]. Available from: https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/adding-it-up-contraception-mnh-adolescents-kenya
- World Health Organization (WHO). WHO | preventing unsafe abortion [Internet]. WHO. [cited 2020 Jul 24]. Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/unsafe_abortion/hrpwork/en/
- Center for Health and Gender Equity. A powerful force: U.S. global health assistance and reproductive health and rights in Malawi [Internet]; 2020. Available from: http://www.genderhealth.org/files/uploads/change/publications/CHANGE_A_Powerful_Force_Malawi_February_2020.pdf
- Population Action International (PAI). Access denied: Senegal – preliminary impacts of Trump’s expanded Global Gag Rule [Internet]. PAI; 2018. Available from: https://pai.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Access-Denied-Senegal.pdf
- Seevers RE. The politics of gagging: the effects of the Global Gag Rule on democratic participation and political advocacy in Peru. Brook J Int’l L. 2005;31:38.
- Thapa S. Abortion law in Nepal: the road to reform. Reprod Health Matters. 2004;12:85–94. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(04)24006-X
- Center for Reproductive Rights. Forum for women, law and development (FWLD). Safe motherhood and reproductive health rights act [Internet]; 2018. Available from: https://reproductiverights.org/sites/default/files/2020-01/Safe%20Motherhood%20and%20Reproductive%20Health%20Rights%20Act%20in%20English.pdf
- Khatri RB, Poudel S, Ghimire PR. Factors associated with unsafe abortion practices in Nepal: pooled analysis of the 2011 and 2016 Nepal demographic and health surveys. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0223385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223385
- Rogers C, Sapkota S, Paudel R, et al. Medical abortion in Nepal: a qualitative study on women’s experiences at safe abortion services and pharmacies. Reprod Health. 2019;16:105. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0755-0
- Yogi A, Prakash KC, Neupane S. Prevalence and factors associated with abortion and unsafe abortion in Nepal: a nationwide cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:376. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2011-y