Obstacles and opportunities: a qualitative study of the experiences of abortion centre staff with abortion care during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Flanders, Belgium

References

• Verhoeven V, Tsakitzidis G, Philips H, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the core functions of primary care: will the cure be worse than the disease? A qualitative interview study in Flemish GPs. BMJ Open. 2020;10(6):e039674. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intermutualistische enquete raadplegingen op afstand (NIC). (2020). In van het Rijksinstituut voor ziekte- en invaliditeitsverzekering. Available from: https://www.riziv.fgov.be/nl/themas/kost-terugbetaling/door-ziekenfonds/Paginas/zorg-afstand-wat-leren-eerste-ervaringen.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Riley T, Sully E, Ahmed Z, et al. Estimates of the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual and reproductive health in low- and middle-income countries. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020;46:73–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1363/46e9020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanis EC, Parsons JA. Legal and policy responses to the delivery of abortion care during COVID-19. Int J Gynecol Obstetrics. 2020;151:479–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aly J, Haeger KO, Christy AY, et al. Contraception access during the COVID-19 pandemic. Contracept Reprod Med. 2020;5(1):17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-020-00114-9.
   Google Scholar
• Moreau C, Shankar M, Glasier A, et al. Abortion regulation in Europe in the era of COVID-19: a spectrum of policy responses. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2020-200724.
   Google Scholar
• Caruana-Finkel L. Abortion in the time of COVID-19: perspectives from Malta. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020;28(1):1780679. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2020.1780679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cioffi A, Cioffi F, Rinaldi R. COVID-19 and abortion: the importance of guaranteeing a fundamental right. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2020;25:100538. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons JA, Romanis EC. 2020 developments in the provision of early medical abortion by telemedicine in the UK. Health Policy. 2020. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.11.006.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation (WHO). (2020). Maintaining essential health services: operational guidance for the COVID-19 context. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/332240/WHO-2019-nCoV-essential_health_services-2020.2-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg LD, VandeVusse A, Mueller J, et al. Early impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the 2020 Guttmacher survey of reproductive health experiences. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken ARA, Starling JE, Gomperts R, et al. Demand for self-managed online telemedicine abortion in eight European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: a regression discontinuity analysis. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.15.20195222.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken ARA, Starling JE, Gomperts R, et al. Demand for self-managed online telemedicine abortion in the United States during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(4):835–837. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter C, Lord J, Church K. (2020). Early medical abortion using telemedicine-acceptability to patients. medRxiv.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation (WHO). European Health Information Gateway. Abortions per 1000 live births. [cited 2020 Oct 26]. Available from: https://gateway.euro.who.int/en/indicators/hfa_586-7010-abortions-per-1000-live-births/.
   Google Scholar
• Nationale Evaluatiecommissie Zwangerschapsafbreking (National Evaluation Committee on Pregnancy Termination). (2020). Nationale commissie voor de evaluatie van de wet van 3 april 1990 betreffende de zwangerschapsafbreking (wet van 13 augustus 1990) Verslag ten behoeve van het parlement 1 januari 2016–31 december 2017. [cited 2021 Feb 5]. Available from: https://overlegorganen.gezondheid.belgie.be/sites/default/files/documents/volledig_verslag_2018_nl_2020_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Döring N. How is the COVID-19 pandemic affecting our sexualities? An overview of the current media narratives and research hypotheses. Arch Sex Behav. 2020;49(8):2765–2778. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01790-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanis EC, Parsons JA, Hodson N. COVID-19 and reproductive justice in Great Britain and the United States: ensuring access to abortion care during a global pandemic. J Law Biosci. 2020;7(1). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaa027.
   Google Scholar
• Oyediran KA, Makinde OA, Adelakin O. The role of telemedicine in addressing access to sexual and reproductive health services in sub-saharan Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic. Afr J Reprod Health. 2020;24(2):49–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assis MP, Larrea S. Why self-managed abortion is so much more than a provisional solution for times of pandemic. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020;28(1):1779633. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2020.1779633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar