Community and health provider perspectives on the quality of family planning and contraceptive services in Kabwe District, Zambia

References

• Starbird E, Norton M, Marcus R. Investing in family planning: key to achieving the sustainable development goals. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4(2):191–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. The sustainable development goals report; 2019. [cited 2020 Apr 5]. Available from: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2019/.
   Google Scholar
• Germain A, Sen G, Garcia-Moreno C, et al. Advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in low and middle-income countries: implications for the post- 2015 global development agenda. Glob Public Health. 2015;10(2):137–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darroch JE, Woog V, Bankole A, et al. Costs and benefits of meeting the contraceptive needs of adolescents. Guttmacher Institute; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Harris S, Reichenbach L, Hardee K. Measuring and monitoring quality of care in family planning: are we ignoring negative experiences? Open Access J Contracept. 2016;7:97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argago TG, Hajito KW, Kitila SB. Clients satisfaction with family planning services and associated factors among family planning users in Hossana Town Public Health Facilities, South Ethiopia: facility-based cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Midwifery. 2015;7(5):74–83.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra-Mouli V, Svanemyr J, Amin A, et al. Twenty years after international conference on population and development: where are we with adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights? J Adolesc Health. 2015;56(1):S1–S6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. Quality of care in the provision of sexual and reproductive health services: evidence from a WHO research initiative. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Dehlendorf C, Henderson JT, Vittinghoff E, et al. Association of the quality of interpersonal care during family planning counseling with contraceptive use. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(1):78.e1–78.e9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yih Y. Handbook of healthcare delivery systems. West Lafayette (IN): CRC Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce J. Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework. Stud Fam Plann. 1990;21(2):61–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit J, Steyn P, Nkole T, et al. Quality of care in family planning and contraceptive services as defined by communities and health care providers: a scoping review. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21(sup1):1–151.
   Google Scholar
• Assaf S, Wang W, Mallick L. Quality of care in family planning services in Senegal and their outcomes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Yan LD, Mwale J, Straitz S, et al. Equity dimensions of the availability and quality of reproductive, maternal and neonatal health services in Zambia. Trop Med Int Health. 2018;23(4):433–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain AK, Hardee K. Revising the FP quality of care framework in the context of rights-based family planning. Stud Fam Plann. 2018;49(2):171–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keesara SR, Juma PA, Harper CC. Why do women choose private over public facilities for family planning services? A qualitative study of post-partum women in an informal urban settlement in Kenya. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Akol A, Chin-Quee D, Wamala-Mucheri P, et al. Getting closer to people: family planning provision by drug shops in Uganda. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014;2(4):472–481.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ngo TD, Nuccio O, Pereira SK, et al. Evaluating a LARC expansion program in 14 sub-Saharan African countries: a service delivery model for meeting FP2020 goals. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21(9):1734–1743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galle A, Vermandere H, Griffin S, et al. Quality of care in family planning services in rural Mozambique with a focus on long acting reversible contraceptives: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Womens Health. 2018;18(1):1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cordero JP, Steyn PS, Gichangi P, et al. Community and provider perspectives on addressing unmet need for contraception: key findings from a formative phase research in Kenya, South Africa and Zambia (2015-2016). Afr J Reprod Health. 2019;23(3):106–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. Ensuring human rights in the provision of contraceptive information and services: guidance and recommendations. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK195054/
   Google Scholar
• Munakampe MN, Nkole T, Silumbwe A, et al. Feasibility testing of a community dialogue approach for promoting the uptake of family planning and contraceptive services in Zambia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silumbwe A, Nkole T, Munakampe MN, et al. Facilitating community participation in family planning and contraceptive services provision and uptake: community and health provider perspectives. Reprod Health. 2020;17(1):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silumbwe A, Nkole T, Munakampe MN, et al. Community and health systems barriers and enablers to family planning and contraceptive services provision and use in Kabwe district, Zambia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Central Statistical Office (CSO). [Zambia], M.o.H.M.Z., and ICF International, Zambia Demographic and Health Survey 2013-2014; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Koffi TB, Weidert K, Bitasse EO, et al. Engaging men in family planning: perspectives from married men in Lomé, Togo. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018;6(2):317–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavin H. Thematic analysis. Understanding research methods and statistics in psychology. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 2008. p. 273–282.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim U, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Milford C, Kriel Y, Njau I, et al. Teamwork in qualitative research: descriptions of a multicountry team approach. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917727189
   Google Scholar
• Jacobstein R, Stanley H. Contraceptive implants: providing better choice to meet growing family planning demand. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013;1(1):11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels-Igbokwe C, Terris-Prestholt F, Lagarde M, et al. Young people’s preferences for family planning service providers in rural Malawi: a discrete choice experiment. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0143287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson T, Mead KH, Wood S, et al. Privacy and confidentiality practices in adolescent family planning care at federally qualified health centers. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016;48(1):17–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schivone GB, Glish LL. Contraceptive counseling for continuation and satisfaction. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;29(6):443–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steyn PS, Cordero JP, Gichangi P, et al. Participatory approaches involving community and healthcare providers in family planning/contraceptive information and service provision: a scoping review. Reprod Health. 2016;13(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Atuahene MD, Afari EO, Adjuik M, et al. Health knowledge, attitudes and practices of family planning service providers and clients in Akwapim North District of Ghana. Contracept Reprod Medicine. 2016;1(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Mpunga D, Lumbayi JP, Dikamba N, et al. Availability and quality of family planning services in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: high potential for improvement. Glob Health, Sci Pract. 2017;5(2):274–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla A, et al. Client-provider interaction: understanding client experience with family planning service providers through the mystery client approach in India. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020;28(1):1822492.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koblinsky M, Moyer CA, Clara Calvert C, et al. Quality maternity care for every woman, everywhere: a call to action. Lancet. 2016;388(10057):2307–2320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daff BM, Seck C, Belkhayat H, et al. Informed push distribution of contraceptives in Senegal reduces stockouts and improves quality of family planning services. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014;2(2):245–252.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson PL, Do M, Agha S. Measuring client satisfaction and the quality of family planning services: a comparative analysis of public and private health facilities in Tanzania, Kenya and Ghana. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(1):203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond-Smith N, Warnock R, Sudhinaraset M. Interventions to improve the person-centered quality of family planning services: a narrative review. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):1–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider H, Lehmann U. From community health workers to community health systems: time to widen the horizon? Health Syst Reform. 2016;2(2):112–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George AS, LeFevre AE, Schleiff M, et al. Hubris, humility and humanity: expanding evidence approaches for improving and sustaining community health programmes. BMJ Global Health. 2018;3(3):e000811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope DG. Methods and meanings: credibility and trustworthiness of qualitative research. Oncology nursing forum; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research: rigour and qualitative research. Br Med J. 1995;311(6997):109–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar