Prevalence of non-preferred family planning methods among reproductive-aged women in Burkina Faso: results from a cross-sectional, population-based study

References

• Rattan J, Noznesky E, Curry DW, et al. Rapid contraceptive uptake and changing method mix with high use of long-acting reversible contraceptives in crisis-affected populations in Chad and the democratic republic of the Congo. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4:S5–S20. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00315.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sedgh G, Hussain R. Reasons for contraceptive nonuse among women having unmet need for contraception in developing countries. Stud Fam Plann. 2014;45:151–169. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00382.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speizer IS. Using strength of fertility motivations to identify family planning program strategies. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2006;32:185–191. doi:10.1363/ifpp.32.185.06.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rominski SD, Stephenson R. Toward a new definition of unmet need for contraception. Stud Fam Plann. 2019;50:195–198. doi:10.1111/SIFP.12084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandi K, Fuentes L. The history of tiered-effectiveness contraceptive counseling and the importance of patient-centered family planning care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222:S873–S877. doi:10.1016/J.AJOG.2019.11.1271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• le Guen M, Schantz C, Régnier-Loilier A, et al. Reasons for rejecting hormonal contraception in western countries: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2021;284:114247; doi:10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2021.114247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens LM. “We have to be mythbusters”: clinician attitudes about the legitimacy of patient concerns and dissatisfaction with contraception. Soc Sci Med. 2018;212:145–152. doi:10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2018.07.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tumlinson K, Britton LE, Williams CR, et al. Contraceptive method denial as downward contraceptive coercion: a mixed-methods mystery client study in Western Kenya. Contraception. 2022;115:53–58. doi:10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2022.06.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothschild CW, Brown W, Drake AL. Incorporating method dissatisfaction into unmet need for contraception: implications for measurement and impact. Stud Fam Plann. 2021;52:95–102. doi:10.1111/SIFP.12146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersek JL, Huber LRB, Thompson ME, et al. Satisfaction and discontinuation of contraception by contraceptive method among university women. Matern Child Health J. 2011;15:497–506. doi:10.1007/S10995-010-0610-Y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlejohn KE. Hormonal contraceptive use and discontinuation because of dissatisfaction: differences by race and education. Demography. 2012;49:1433–1452. doi:10.1007/S13524-012-0127-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau C, Cleland K, Trussell J. Contraceptive discontinuation attributed to method dissatisfaction in the United States. Contraception. 2007;76:267–272. doi:10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2007.06.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis S, Evens E, Sambisa W. Contraceptive discontinuation and unintended pregnancy: an imperfect relationship. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011;37:58–66. doi:10.1363/3705811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz J, Dumbaugh M, Bapolisi W, et al. “So that’s why I’m scared of these methods”: locating contraceptive side effects in embodied life circumstances in Burundi and eastern democratic republic of the Congo. Soc Sci Med. 2019;220:264–272. doi:10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2018.09.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senderowicz L. Contraceptive autonomy: conceptions and measurement of a novel family planning indicator. Stud Fam Plann. 2020;51:161–176. doi:10.1111/sifp.12114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton L, Williams C, Onyango D, et al. “When it comes to time of removal, nothing is straightforward”: A qualitative study of experiences with barriers to removal of long-acting reversible contraception in western Kenya. Contracept X. 2021;3:100063. doi:10.1016/J.CONX.2021.100063.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calhoun LM, Speizer IS, Rimal R, et al. Provider imposed restrictions to clients’ access to family planning in urban Uttar Pradesh, India: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:1–13. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-532/TABLES/6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzer J, Bell A. “We’re a little biased”: medicine and the management of bias through the case of contraception. J Health Soc Behav. 2021;62:120–135. doi:10.1177/00221465211003232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PMA Burkina Faso. PMA Burkina Faso: Results from Phase 3 cross-sectional survey; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt HM, Speizer IS, Corroon M. Contraceptive service provider imposed restrictions to contraceptive access in urban Nigeria. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1): 268. doi:10.1186/S12913-017-2233-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senderowicz L. “I was obligated to accept”: A qualitative exploration of contraceptive coercion. Soc Sci Med. 2019a;239:112531; doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senderowicz L, Pearson E, Hackett K, et al. I haven’t heard much about other methods”: quality of care and person-centredness in a programme to promote the postpartum intrauterine device in Tanzania. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6:e005775; doi:10.1136/BMJGH-2021-005775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidze EM, Lardoux S, Speizer IS, et al. Young women’s access to and use of contraceptives: the role of providers’ restrictions in urban Senegal. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;40:176–183. doi:10.1363/4017614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieverding M, Schatzkin E, Shen J, et al. Bias in contraceptive provision to young women Among private health care providers in south west Nigeria. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2018;44:19–29. doi:10.1363/44E5418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towriss CA, Phillips TK, Brittain K, et al. The injection or the injection? Restricted contraceptive choices among women living with HIV. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019;27:215–227. doi:10.1080/26410397.2019.1628593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tumlinson K, Okigbo CC, Speizer IS. Provider barriers to family planning access in urban Kenya. Contraception. 2015;92:143–151. doi:10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2015.04.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yirgu R, Wood SN, Karp C, et al. “You better use the safer one … leave this one”: The role of health providers in women’s pursuit of their preferred family planning methods. BMC Womens Health. 2020;20:1–9. doi:10.1186/S12905-020-01034-1/TABLES/1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuniga C, Wollum A, Grindlay K, et al. The impacts of contraceptive stock-outs on users, providers, and facilities: A systematic literature review. Glob Public Health. 2022;17:83–99. doi:10.1080/17441692.2020.1850829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton C, Kim R, Janiak E. Prevalence of contraindications to progestin-only contraceptive pills in a multi-institution patient database. Contraception. 2021;103:367–370. doi:10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2021.01.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge CP, Zhao X, Sileanu FE, et al. Medical contraindications to estrogen and contraceptive use among women veterans. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:234.e1–234.e9; doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung S. “She told me no, that with my weight it is better to use the IUD:” A Mixed-Methods Study of Non-Preferred Contraceptive Method Use for Medical Reasons [master's thesis]. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use; n.d. p. 268
   Google Scholar
• Bullington BW, Sata A, Arora KS. Shared decision-making: The way forward for postpartum contraceptive counseling. Open Access J Contracept. 2022;13:121–129. doi:10.2147/OAJC.S360833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehlendorf C, Grumbach K, Schmittdiel JA, et al. Shared decision making in contraceptive counseling. Contraception. 2017;95:452–455. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2016.12.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edossa ZK, Debela TF, Mizana BA. Women’s decision on contraceptive Use in Ethiopia: multinomial analysis of evidence from Ethiopian demographic and health survey. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2020;7:233339282092456. doi:10.1177/2333392820924565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mare KU, Aychiluhm SB, Tadesse AW, et al. Married women’s decision-making autonomy on contraceptive use and its associated factors in Ethiopia: A multilevel analysis of 2016 demographic and health survey. SAGE Open Med. 2022;10:205031212110687. doi:10.1177/20503121211068719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PMA Burkina Faso. Performance Monitoring for Action Burkina Faso Results from Phase 1 Baseline Survey; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Senderowicz L. Conceptions and measurement of contraceptive autonomy. Cambridge: Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; 2019b.
   Google Scholar
• Rossier C, Soura A, Baya B, et al. Profile: the Ouagadougou health and demographic surveillance system. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41:658–666. doi:10.1093/IJE/DYS090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sié A, Louis VR, Gbangou A, et al. The health and demographic surveillance system (HDSS) in Nouna, Burkina Faso, 1993-2007. Glob Health Action. 2010;3:5284. doi:10.3402/GHA.V3I0.5284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mph RO, Bénet T, Argaud L, et al. Heat map for data visualization in infection control epidemiology: An application describing the relationship between hospital-acquired infections, simplified acute physiological score II, and length of stay in adult intensive care units. Am J Infect Control. 2017;45:746–755. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2017.02.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne L, Cooper S, Tiendrebeogo C, et al. Using experience to create evidence: a mixed methods process evaluation of the new free family planning policy in Burkina Faso. Reprod Health. 2022;19:1–16. doi:10.1186/S12978-022-01375-0/TABLES/3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkina Faso: Historic day for advancing sexual and reproductive health rights [WWW Document]. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2019/06/burkina-faso-historic-day-for-advancing-sexual-and-reproductive-health-rights/ (accessed 7.10.22); n.d.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton JD, Jacobstein RA, Angle MA. Medical barriers to access to family planning. Lancet. 1992;340:1334–1335. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(92)92505-A.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero L, Mendoza Z, Hurst S, et al. Strategies and safeguards to ensure access to long-acting reversible contraception removal after the Zika contraception access network ended: A prospective analysis of patient reported complaints. Contraception. 2020;102:356–360. doi:10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2020.08.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tumlinson K, Britton L, Williams C, et al. Provider verbal disrespect in the provision of family planning in public-sector facilities in Western Kenya. Qualitative Research in Health. 2022;2:100178. doi:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100178.
   Google Scholar
• Littlejohn KE. Just get on the pill : the uneven burden of reproductive politics. Oakland, CA: University of California Press; n.d.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez AM, Fuentes L, Allina A. Women or LARC first? reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;46:171–175, doi:10.1363/46E1614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JA. Celebration meets caution: long acting reversible contraception (LARC)’s boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach. Contraception. 2014;89:237–241. doi:10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2014.01.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar