https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5940-9079
References
- Rowlands S. Interference with and abuses of sexual and reproductive health and rights: a new proposal for classification and terminology. Eur J Contraception Repro Health Care. 2022;27(5):357–363. doi:10.1080/13625187.2022.2092091.
- Wale J, Rowlands S. When worlds collide: non-state actors, philanthropy and the commercial promotion of fertility control options in developing countries. J Philanthropy Marketing. 2022;27:e1737. doi:10.1002/nvsm.1737.
- Senderowicz L, Maloney N. Supply-side versus demand-side unmet need: implications for family planning programs. Population Dev Rev. 2022;48(3):689–722. doi:10.1111/padr.12478.
- Nandagiri R. What’s so troubling about “voluntary” family planning anyway? A feminist perspective. Population Stud. 2021;75:221–234. doi:10.1080/00324728.2021.1996623.
- Lowe P, Rowlands S. Long-acting reversible contraception: targeting those judged to be unfit for parenthood in the United States and the United Kingdom. Glob Public Health. 2022;17:3773–3784. doi:10.1080/17441692.2022.2048408.
- Wale J, Rowlands S. Incentivised sterilisation: lessons from India and for the future. Eur J Contraception Repro Health Care. 2020;25(4):314–318. doi:10.1080/13625187.2020.1766015.