Social Science Boot Camp: Development and Assessment of a Foundational Course on Academic Literacy in the Social Sciences

References

• Ackerman, E. & B. K. Arbour. 2016. “‘I Have Ten Peer Reviewed Articles. Now What?’ How Political Science Research Methods Textbooks Teach Students About Scholarly Context.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2016.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of College & Research Libraries. 2016. “Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education.” http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/issues/infolit/Framework_ILHE.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Birr Moje, E. 2007. “Chapter 1: Developing Socially Just Subject-Matter Instruction: A Review of the Literature on Disciplinary Literacy Teaching” Review of Research in Education 31: 1–44. doi:10.3102/0091732X07300046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoyne, S., & Eaton, J. 2017. “The Effects of Flipping a Module on ‘Junk Science’ in a Large Methods Course.” Manuscript in production.
   Google Scholar
• Caulfield, S. L. & C. Hodges Persell. 2006. “Teaching Social Science Reasoning and Quantitative Literacy: The Role of Collaborative Groups.” Teaching Sociology 34 (1): 39–53. doi:10.1177/0092055x0603400104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Routledge Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Daugherty, A. L. & M. F. Russo. 2011. “An Assessment of the Lasting Effects of a Standalone Information Literacy Course: The Students' Perspective.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 37: 319–26. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2011.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregorian, V. 2004. “Colleges Must Reconstruct the Unity of Knowledge.” The Chronicle, June 4. http://www.chronicle.com/article/Colleges-Must-Reconstruct-the/24245.
   Google Scholar
• Gormally, C., P. Brickman, B. Hallar, & N. Armstrong. 2009. “Effects of Inquiry-Based Learning on Students' Science Literacy Skills and Confidence.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 3 (2), Article 16. http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol3/iss2/16
   Google Scholar
• Haigh, A. E. & C. J. Kinsella. 2016. “Bringing in the Librarians: Rethinking Collaboration for Political Science Research Projects.” Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian 35: 19–31. doi: 10.1080/01639269.2016.1128300
   Google Scholar
• Head, A. J. 2008. “Information Literacy from the Trenches: How do Humanities and Social Science Majors Conduct Academic Research?” College & Research Libraries 69 (5): 427–46. doi:10.5860/crl.69.5.427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. & J. Allen. 2012. “Evaluating Psychology Students' Library Skills and Experiences.” Psychology Teaching Review 18 (2): 94–115.
   Google Scholar
• Lakens, D. 2013. “Calculating and Reporting Effect Sizes to Facilitate Cumulative Science: A Practical Primer for t-tests and ANOVAs.” Frontiers in Psychology 4 (863): 1–12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majetic, C. & Pellegrino, C. 2014. “When Science and Information Literacy Meet: An Approach to Exploring the Sources of Science News with Non-Science Majors.” College Teaching 62 (3): 107–12. doi:10.1080/87567555.2014.916650
   Google Scholar
• McKay, T. J. M. & Z. Simpson. 2013. “The Space Between: Pedagogic Collaboration between a Writing Center and an Academic Department.” Perspectives in Education 31 (4): 27–43.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, C. D. & H. A. Skinner. 2006. “Ehealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 8 (2): e9. doi:10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orne, M. T. 1962. “On the Social Psychology of the Psychological Experiment: With Particular Reference to Demand Characteristics and their Implications.” American Psychologist 17: 776–83. doi.org/10.1037/h0043424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skene, A. & S. Fedko. 2014. “Instructional Scaffolding.” Center for Teaching and Learning – University of Toronto. Accessed August 19, 2016. http://ctl.utsc.utoronto.ca/technology/sites/default/files/Scaffolding_Pamphlet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, A. & V. Shannon. 2016. “Librarians in the Midst: Improving Student Research through Collaborative Instruction.” Journal of Political Science Education 12 (4): 457–70. doi:10.1080/15512169.2016.1157486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. 2008. “Focus on Formative Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 78 (1): 153–89. doi:10.3102/0034654307313795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehlburg, C. M. 2006. “Meaningful Course Revision: Enhancing Academic Engagement using Student Learning Data.” Centers for Teaching and Technology – Book Library. Paper 162. http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ct2-library/162.
   Google Scholar