A 3-2-1 Approach to Undergraduate Reading Compliance and Critical Analysis

References

• Anson, Chris M., and Robert A. Schwegler. 2012. “Tracking the Mind’s Eye: A New Technology for Researching Twenty-First-Century Writing and Reading Processes.” College Composition and Communication 64 (1):151–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arum, Richard, 2011. and, and Josipa Roksa. Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bain, Ken. 2004. What the Best College Teachers Do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bean, John C. 2011. Engaging Ideas: The Professor's Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossy-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bettinger, Eric P., and Bridget Terry Long. 2009. “Addressing the Needs of Underprepared Students in Higher Education Does College Remediation Work?” Journal of Human Resources 44 (3):736–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.44.3.736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boakye, Naomi, and Michael-Mare Linden. 2018. “Extended Strategy-Use Instruction to Improve Students’ Reading Proficiency in a Content Subject.” Reading and Writing 9 (1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, Karen. 2007. “Reading Noncompliance: A Case Study and Reflection.” Mountain Rise, the International Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 4 (1):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Brost, Brian D., and Karen A. Bradley. 2006. “Student Compliance with Assigned Reading: A Case Study.” Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 6 (2):101–11.
   Google Scholar
• Burchfield, Colin M., and John Sappington. 2000. “Compliance with Required Reading Assignments.” Teaching of Psychology 27 (1):58–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carillo, EllenC. 2015. Securing a Place for Reading in Composition: The Importance of Teaching for Transfer. Logan: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engstrom, Cathy McHugh. 2008. “Curricular Learning Communities and Unprepared Students: How Faculty Can Provide a Foundation for Success.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2008 (115):5–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.322.
   Google Scholar
• Fancsali, Cheri, Yasuyo Abe, Mikhail Pyatigorsky, Lorena Ortiz, Vincent Chan, Eliana Saltares, Megan Toby, Adam Schellinger, and Andrew Jaciw. 2015. “The Impact of the Reading Apprenticeship Improving Secondary Education (RAISE) Project on Academic Literacy in High School: A Report of a Randomized Experiment in Pennsylvania and California Schools.” Empirical Education. Accessed 12 August 2020. https://www.empiricaleducation.com/pdfs/RAISEfr.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Graff, Gerald, and Cathy Birkenstein. 2018. They Say/I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. New York: WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hatteberg, Sarah J., and Kody Steffy. 2013. “Increasing Reading Compliance of Undergraduates: An Evaluation of Compliance Methods.” Teaching Sociology 41 (4):346–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X13490752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiner, Cynthia E., Amanda I. Banet, and Carl Wieman. 2014. “Preparing Students for Class: How to Get 80% of Students Reading the Textbook before Class.” American Journal of Physics 82 (10):989–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4895008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, Charles, and Alvin Rosenthal. 2006. “Reading Questions: Encouraging Students to Read the Text before Coming to Class.” Journal of College Science Teaching 35 (1):46–50.
   Google Scholar
• Herreid, Clyde Freeman, and Nancy A. Schiller 2013. “Case Studies and the Flipped Classroom.” Journal of College Science Teaching 42 (5):62–6.
   Google Scholar
• Higton, John, James Noble, Sarah Pope, Naomi Boal, Steven Ginnis, Rory Donaldson, and Helen Greevy. 2012. Fit for Purpose? The View of the Higher Education Sector, Teachers and Employers on the Suitability of a Levels. London: Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, EricH. 2004. Getting Students to Read: 14 Tips. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, Linda C., Eric C. Anderson, Tara S. Carpenter, Lili Cui, Tiffany Malinky Gierasch, Sarah Leupen, Kalman M. Nanes, and Cynthia R. Wagner. 2015. “Using Reading Quizzes in STEM Classes—the What, Why, and How.” Journal of College Science Teaching 045 (01):49–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst15_045_01_49.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeft, Mary E. 2012. “Why University Students Don't Read: What Professors Can Do to Increase Compliance.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 6 (2):1–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060212.
   Google Scholar
• Horning, Alice S. 2018. “Neuroscience of Reading: Developing Expertise in Reading and Writing.” In Contemporary Perspectives on Cognition and Writing, edited by P. Portanova, J. M. Rifenburg, and D. H. Roen, 79–94. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Jay R. 2004. “Just-In-Time Teaching in Sociology or How I Convinced My Students to Actually Read the Assignment.” Teaching Sociology 32 (4):385–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X0403200404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Steven. 2019. “The Fall; and Rise, of Reading.” The Chronicle of Higher Education 65 (31): A14–A21.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Bethany C., and Marc T. Kiviniemi. 2009. “The Effect of Online Chapter Quizzes on Exam Performance in an Undergraduate Social Psychology Course.” Teaching of Psychology (Columbia, Mo.) 36 (1):33–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280802528972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachka, Pamela. 2012. “Understanding the Flipped Classroom.” Faculty Focus: Higher Ed Teaching Strategies from Mana Publication. Accessed 31 July 2020. https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/blended-flipped-learning/understanding-the-flipped-classroom-part-2/
   Google Scholar
• Knoeller, Christian P. 1994. “Negotiating Interpretations of Text: The Role of Student-Led Discussions in Understanding Literature.” Journal of Reading 37 (7):572–80.
   Google Scholar
• Leamson, Robert. 1999. Thinking about Teaching: Developing Habits of Learning with First Year College and University Students. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, Peter. 1974. “How Much, How Often?” College & Research Libraries 35 (6):453–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_35_06_453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Kathleen J. 2010. “Student Attitudes and the Teaching and Learning of Race, Culture and Politics.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26 (3):530–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Kelly, Brian Lukoff, Gary King, and Eric Mazur. 2018. “Use of a Social Annotation Platform for Pre-Class Reading Assignments in a Flipped Introductory Physics Class.” Frontiers in Education 3 (8):1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00008.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Kelly, Sacha Zyto, David Karger, Junehee Yoo, and Eric Mazur. 2016. “Analysis of Student Engagement in an Online Annotation System in the Context of a Flipped Introductory Physics Class.” Physical Review Physics Education Research 12 (2):020143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, Pam A., and Daniel M. Oppenheimer. 2016. “Technology and Note-Taking in the Classroom, Boardroom, Hospital Room, and Courtroom.” Trends in Neuroscience and Education 5 (3):139–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2016.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, Pam, A., and Daniel M. Oppenheimer. 2018. “The Pen is Mightier than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand over Laptop Note Taking”: Corrigendum.” Psychological Science 29 (9):1565–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newport, Cal. 2016. Deep Work: Rules for Focused Success in a Distracted World. New York: Grand Central Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nilson, LindaB. 2010. Teaching at Its Best: A Research-Based Resource for College Instructors. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossy-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, Judith Grunert, Barbara J. Millis, and Margaret W. Cohen, eds. 2008. The Course Syllabus: A Learning-Centered Approach. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossy-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education and Training 2004. The Ontario Curriculum Grades 1-12: Achievement Charts. Toronto, ON: Queen’s Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Parrott, Heather M., and Elizabeth Cherry. 2011. “Using Structured Reading Groups to Facilitate Deep Learning.” Teaching Sociology 39 (4):354–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X11418687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressley, Michael, PamelaBeard El-Dinary, and Rachel Brown. 1992. “Skilled and Not-So-Skilled Reading: Good Information Processing and Not-So-Good Information Processing.” In Promoting Academic Competence and Literacy in School, edited by M. Pressley, K. R. Harris, and J. T. Guthrie, 91–127. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Redding, Richard E. 1998. “Students’ Evaluations of Teaching Fuel Grade Inflation.” American Psychologist 53 (11):1227–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.11.1227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinertsen, Priscilla, and Gina DaCruz. 1996. “Using the Daily Newspaper and Journal Writing to Teach Large Introductory Sociology Classes.” Teaching Sociology 24 (1):102–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1318904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, Keith A. 2011. “Imagine Deep Learning.” Michigan Sociological Review 25:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenbach, Ruth, Cynthia Greenleaf, and Lynn Murphy. 2012. Reading for Understanding: How Reaching Apprenticeship Improves Disciplinary Learning in Secondary and College Classrooms. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossy-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Self, James. 1987. “Reserve Readings and Student Grades: Analysis of a Case Study.” Library and Information Science Research 9 (1):29–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Clair-Thompson, Helen, Alison Graham, and Sara Marsham. 2018. “Exploring the Reading Practices of Undergraduate Students.” Education Inquiry 9 (3):284–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2017.1380487.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education 2016. “Program Integrity Questions and Answers - Credit Hour.” Accessed 31 July 2020. https://www2.ed.gov/policy/highered/reg/hearulemaking/2009/credit.html#credit.
   Google Scholar
• Yamane, David. 2006. “Course Preparation Assignments: A Strategy for Creating Discussion-Based Courses.” Teaching Sociology 34 (3):236–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X0603400303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar