Partner Relationship Quality and Drug Use as Predictors of Women's Substance Abuse Treatment Outcome

References

• SAMHSA. Summary of Findings from the 1999 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Rockville, MD: Author, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• SAMHSA. Women in Substance Abuse Treatment: The DASIS Report for August 24, 2001. 2001. Retrieved June 15, 2002 from www.samhsa.gov/oas/facts/FemTX/FemTX.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• In:. Straussner S LA, Zelvin E, eds. Gender Issues in Addiction: Men and Women in Treatment. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• McCollum E E, Trepper T S. “Little by little, pulling me through.” Women's perception of successful drug treatment: a qualitative inquiry. J Fam Psychother 1995; 6(1):63–82. [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Emener W G. Persons recovering from alcoholism and other drugs: a study of their experiences with, perceptions of, and recommendations for, treatment. J Appl Rehabil Couns 1993; 24:47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Gomberg E S. Women and alcohol: use and abuse. J of Nerv Ment Dis 1993; 181:211–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis R A, Haller D L, Branch D, Ingersoll K S. Retention issues involving drug-abusing women in treatment research. In: Rahdert E R, ed. Treatment for Drug-Exposed Women and Children: Advances in Research Methodology–NIDA Research Monograph 165. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1996:110–122.
   Google Scholar
• Smith I E, Dent D Z, Coles C D, Falek A. A comparison study of treated and untreated pregnant and post-partum cocaine-abusing women. J Subst Abuse Treat 1992; 9:343–348. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arfken C L, Klein C, di Menza S, Schuster C R. Gender differences in problem severity at assessment and treatment retention. J Subst Abuse Treat 2001; 20:53–57., [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson T S, McCollum E E, Wetchler J L, Trepper T S, Lewis R A. Therapy with women substance abusers. J Fem Fam Ther 1996; 8:5–27. [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anglin M D, Booth M W, Kao C, Harlow L L. Similarity of behavior within addict couples: II. Addiction-related variables. Int J Addict 1987; 22:583–607. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams R J, Chang S Y. A comprehensive and comparative review of adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome. Clin Psychol-Sci Pract 2000; 7(2):138–166. [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilsnack R W, Wilsnack S C, Klassen A D. Women's drinking and drinking problems: patterns from a 1981 national survey. Am J Public Health 1984; 74:1231–1238. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton M D. The role of family and significant others in the engagement and retention of drug-dependent individuals. In: Onken L S, Blaine J D, Boren J J, eds. Beyond the Therapeutic Alliance: Keeping the Drug-Dependent Individual in Treatment–NIDA Research Monograph 165. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1997:157–180.
   Google Scholar
• Connors G J, Maisto S A, Zywiak W H. Male and female alcoholics' attributions regarding the onset and termination of relapses and the maintenance of abstinence. J Subst Abuse 1998; 10:27–42. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fals-Stewart W, Birchler G R, O'Farrell T J. Drug-abusing patients and their intimate partners: dyadic adjustment, relationship stability, and substance use. J Abnorm Psychology 1999; 108:11–23. [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcomb M D. Drug use and intimate relationships among women and men: separating specific from general effects in prospective data using structural equation models. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994; 62:463–476. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCollum E E, Lewis R A, Nelson T S, Trepper T S, Wetchler J L. Couple treatment for drug abusing women: effects on drug-use and need for treatment. J Couple Relationship Ther 2003; 2(4):1–18. [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Lewis R A. The dyadic formation inventory: an instrument for measuring heterosexual couple development. Int J Sociol Fam 1973; 2:207–216.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis R A, Filsinger E E, Conger R D, McAvoy P. Love relationships among heroin-involved couples: traditional self-report and behavioral assessment. In: Filsinger E E, Lewis R A, eds. Assessing Marriage: New Behavioral Approaches. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1981:263–269.
   Google Scholar
• Schumm W R, Paff-Bergen L A, Hatch R C, Obiorah F C, Copeland J M, Meens L D, Bugaighis M A. Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. J Marriage Fam 1986; 48:381–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover K J, Paff-Bergen L A, Russell C S, Schumm W R. The Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale: a further report. Psychol Rep 1984; 54:629–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumm W R, Nichols C W, Schectma K L, Grigsby C C. Characteristics of responses to the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale by a sample of 84 married mothers. Psychol Rep 1983; 53:567–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumm W R, Scanlon E D, Crow C L, Green D N, Buckler D L. Characteristics of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale in sample of 79 married couples. Psychol Rep 1983; 53:583–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell S E, Newell G K, Schumm W R. Test-retest reliability of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Psychol Rep 1983; 53:545–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumm W R, Anderson S A, Benigas J E, McCuthceon M B, Griffin C L, Morris J E, Race G S. Criterion-related validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Psychol Rep 1985; 56:719–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan A T, Kushner H, Metzger D, Peters R, Smith I, Grisson G, Pettinati H, Argeriou M. The fifth edition of the addiction severity index. J Subst Abuse Treat 1992; 9:199–213. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan A T, Luborsky L, Cacciola J, Griffith J, Evans F, Barr H L, O'Brien C P. New data from the Addiction Severity Index. Reliability and validity in three centers. J of Nerv Ment Dis 1985; 173:412–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan A T, Luborsky L, O'Brien C P, Barr H L, Evans F. The addiction severity index in three different populations. NIDA Res Monogr 1984; 55:217–223. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McLellan A T, Luborsky L, Woody G E, O'Brien C P. An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients. The addiction severity index. J of Nerv Ment Dis 1980; 168:26–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark M J. Dropping out of substance abuse treatment: a clinically oriented review. Clin Psych Rev 1992; 12:93–116. [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman D A, Stewart A L, Delucchi K L. Social support and abstinence from opiates and cocaine during opioid maintenance treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend 2001; 65:65–75. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudet A, Magura S, Furst R T, Kumar N, Whitney S. Male partners of substance-abusing women in treatment: an exploratory study. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1999; 25:607–627. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar