282
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

Coerced Treatment for Methamphetamine Abuse: Differential Patient Characteristics and Outcomes

, Ph.D., , Ph.D. & , Ph.D.
Pages 337-356 | Published online: 07 Jul 2009

References

  • Office of the National Drug Control Policy. National Drug Control Strategy: A Ten-Year Plan. Washington, DC: The White House, 1998, Available at http://www.ncjrs.org/ondcppubs/pdf/strat_pt1.pdf (accessed February 1, 2004).
  • Herz, D. Drugs in the Heartland: Methamphetamine Use in Rural Nebraska. National Institute of Justice Research in Brief: April, 2000. Available at http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/nij/180986.pdf (accessed February 1, 2004).
  • NIDA Community Epidemiology Work Group (CEWG). Epidemiologic Trends in Drug Abuse Advance Report. Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 2001.
  • Office of the National Drug Control Policy. National Drug Control Strategy. Washington, DC: The White House, 2001. Available at http://www.ncjrs.org/ondcppubs/publications/policy/ndcs01/ (accessed February 1, 2004).
  • National Drug Intelligence Center. National Drug Threat Assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, 2003. Available at http://www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs3/3300/meth.htm (accessed February 1, 2004).
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992–2000. National Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment Services. DASIS Series S-17 DHHS Publication No. (SMA)02-3727. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA, 2002.
  • Urada, D, Brecht, M-L, Anglin, M D, Hser, Y-I. California alcohol and other drug treatment: trends in client characteristics, treatment progress, service capacity, and utilization. In: A State Treatment and Demand Needs Assessment: Alcohol and Other Drugs. Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, Office ofApplied Research and Analysis. Sacramento, CA: State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, Office of Applied Research and Analysis, 2002.
  • Travis, J, Vareen, D. Final Report, Mehamphetamine Interagency Task Force. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, 2000. Available on the Internet at http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/nij/180155.pdf. Accessed March 21, 2005.
  • Anglin, M D, Perrochet, B. Drug use and crime: a historical review of research conducted by the UCLA drug abuse research center. Subst Use Misuse 1998; 33(9):1871–1914., [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
  • Rittner, B, Dozier, C. The effects of court-ordered substance abuse treatment in child protective services cases. Social Work 2000; 442(2):131–140.
  • Farabee, D, Prendergast, M, Anglin, M D. The effective of coerced treatment for drug-abusing offenders. Fed Probat 1998; 62(1):3–10.
  • Anglin, M D, Hser, Y. Criminal justice and the drug-abusing offender: policy issues of coerced treatment. Behav Sci Law 1991; 9:243–267. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
  • Gostin, L. Compulsory treatment for drug-dependent persons: justification for a public health approach to drug dependency. Millbank Quart 1991; 69:561–593. [CSA]
  • Leukefeld, C, Tims, F. Compulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1988.
  • Rosenthal, M. The constitutionality of involuntary civil commitment of opiate addicts. J Drug Issues 1988; 18:641–661. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
  • Wild, T, Newton-Taylor, B, Alleto, R. Perceived coercion among clients entering substance abuse treatment: Structural and psychological determinants. Addict Behav 1998; 23(1):81–95. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
  • Platt, J, Buhringer, G, Kaplan, C, Brown, B, Taube, D. The prospects and limitations of compulsory treatment for drug addiction. J Drug Issues 1988; 18(4):505–525. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
  • De Leon, G, Melnick, G, Kressel, D, Jainchill, N. Circumstances, motivation, readiness and suitability (the CMRS scales): predicting retention in therapeutic community treatment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1994; 20(4):495–515. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
  • Joe, G, Simpson, D, Broome, K. Retention and patient engagement models for different treatment modalities in DATOS. Drug Alcohol Depend 1999; 57:113–125. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
  • Simpson, D, Joe, G. Motivation as a predictor of early dropout from drug abuse treatment. Psychotherapy 1993; 30(2):357–368.
  • Brecht, M.-L, Anglin, M D, Wang, J C. Treatment effectiveness for legally coerced vs. voluntary methadone maintenance clients. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1993; 19(1):89–106. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
  • Hiller, M, Knight, K, Broome, K, Stimpson, D. Legal pressure and treatment retention: a national sample of long-term residential programs. Crim Justice Behav 1998; 25(4):463–481. [CSA]
  • McGlothlin, W H, Anglin, M D, Wilson, B D. An evaluation of the California Civil Addict Program. NIDA Services Research Monograph Series DHEW Publication No. ADM 78-558. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1977.
  • Miller, N, Flaherty, J. Effectiveness of coerced addiction treatment (alternative consequences). A review of the clinical research. J Subst Abuse Treat 2000; 18:9–16., [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
  • Prendergast, M, Maugh, T H. Drug courts: diversion that works. Judges J 1995; 34, pp. 10–15, 46–47.
  • Anglin, M D, Longshore, D, Turner, S, McBride, D, Inciardi, J, Prendergast, M. Studies of the Functioning and Effectiveness of Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime (TASC) Programs: Final Report (National Institute on Drug Abuse Contract N01DA-1-8408. Santa Monica, CA: UCLA Drug Abuse Research Center Los Angeles RAND, 1996.
  • Maugh, T, Anglin, M D. Court-ordered drug treatment does work. Judges J 1994; 33(1): 10–13, 38–40.
  • Collins, J, Allison, M. Legal coercion and retention in drug abuse treatment. Hosp Commun Psychiatry 1983; 34(12):1145–1149.
  • Prendergast, M, Anglin, M D, Wellisch, J. Treatment for drug-abusing offenders under community supervision. Fed Probat 1995; 59(4):66–75.
  • Belenko, S. Research on drug courts: a critical review. Natl Drug Court Inst Rev 1998; 1:1–42.
  • Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project [DCCTAP]. Looking at a Decade of Drug Court. Washington, DC: American University Office of Justice Programs DCCTAP, 1999.
  • Guydish, J, Wolfe, E, Tajima, B, Woods, W. Drug court effectiveness: a review of California evaluation reports, 1995–1999. J Psychoact Drugs 2001; 33(4):369–378. [CSA]
  • Terry, W C. The Early Drug Courts: Case Studies in Judicial Innovation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1999.
  • U.S. General Accounting Office. Drug Courts: Better DOJ Data Collection and Evaluation Efforts Needed to Measure Impact of Drug Court Programs. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office, 2002. Available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d02434.pdf (accessed February 1, 2004).
  • Zweben, J (1999) . The role of drug courts in methamphetamine treatment. Methamphetamine Abuse. Proceedings from the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment Regional Conference, Hawaii, December, 1999. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, MD
  • Longshore, D, Evans, E, Urada, D, Teruya, C, Hardy, M, Hser, Y-H, Prendergast, M, Ettner, S. Evaluation of the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act 2002 Report. Los Angeles: UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, 2002.
  • Downs, S, Costin, L, McFadden, E. Child Welfare and Family Service: Policies and Practice. White Plains, NY: Longman, 1996.
  • Azzi-Lessing, L, Olsen, L. Substance abuse-affected families in the child welfare system: new challenges, new alliances. Social Work 1996; 41(1):15–23. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
  • Chaffin, M, Kellerher, K, Hollenberg, J. Onset of physical abuse andneglect: psychiatric, substance abuse, and social risk factors from prospective community data. Child Abuse Neglect 1996; 20(2):191–203. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
  • Dore, M, Doris, J, Wright, P. Identifying substance abuse in maltreating families: a child welfare challenge. Child Abuse Neglect 1995; 19(5):531–543. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
  • National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. No Safe Haven: Children of Substance-Abusing Parents. New York: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University, 1999:4–5.
  • Smyth, J, Miller, B. Parenting issues for women with alcohol and other drug problems. In: S Straussner, E Zelvin, eds. Gender Issues in Addictions. New York: Jason Aronson, 1997:123–150.
  • Berkowitz, G, Brindis, C, Clayson, Z, Peterson, S. Options for recovery: promoting success among women mandated to treatment. J Psychoact Drugs 1996; 28(1):31–38. [CSA]
  • Anglin, M D, Hser, Y.-I, Chou, C.-P. Reliability and validity of retrospective self-report by narcotics addicts. Eval Rev 1993; 17(1):90–107.
  • Chou, C.-P, Hser, Y.-I, Anglin, M D. Pattern reliability of narcotics addicts' self-reported data: A confirmatory assessment of construct validity and consistency. Subst Use Misuse 1996; 31(9):1189–1216. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
  • Hser, Y.-I, Anglin, M D, Chou, C.-P. Reliability of retrospective self-report by heroin addicts. Psychological assessment. J Consult Clin Psychol 1992; 4(2):207–213.
  • Wild, T. Compulsory substance-abuse treatment and harm reduction: a critical analysis. Subst Use Misuse 1999; 3(1):83–102.
  • McKay, J, Alterman, A, Koppenhaver, J, Mulvaney, F, Bovasso, G, Ward, K. Continuous, categorical, and time to event cocaine use outcome variables: degree of intercorrelation and sensitivity to treatment group differences. Drug Alcohol Depend 2001; 62:19–30. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
  • Farabee, D, Hser, Y.-I, Anglin, M D, Huang, D. Recidivism among an early cohort of California's Proposition 36 offenders. Criminology & Public Policy. 2004; 3(4):501–522
  • Brewer, D, Catalano, R, Haggerty, K, Gainey, R, Fleming, C. A meta-analysis of predictors of continued drug use during and after treatment for opiate addiction. Addiction 1998; 93(1):73–92. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
  • McKay, J, Weiss, R. A review of temporal effects and outcome predictors in substance abuse treatment studies with long-term follow-ups. Eval Rev 2001; 25(2):113–161. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
  • Prendergast, M, Podus, D, Chang, E, Urada, D. The effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: a meta-analysis of comparison group studies. Drug Alcohol Depend 2002; 67:53–72. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
  • Brecht, M.-L, von Mayhauser, C, Anglin, M D. Predictors of relapse after treatment for methamphetamine use. J Psychoact Drugs 2000; 32(3):211–220., [CSA]
  • Brecht, M.-L, Greenwell, L, von Mayhauser, C, Anglin, M D. Two-year outcomes of treatment for methamphetamine use. J Psychoact Drugs. In press.
  • Hser, Y.-I, Grella, C, Hsieh, S, Anglin, M D, Brown, B. Prior treatment experience related to process and outcomes in DATOS. Drug Alcohol Depend 1999; 57(2):137–150. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
  • Longshore, D. Treatment motivation among Mexican-American drug-using arrestees. Hisp J Behav Sci 1997; 19(2):214–229. [CSA]
  • Hser, Y.-I, Anglin, M D, Fletcher, B. Comparative treatment effectiveness. J Subst Abuse Treat 1998; 15(6):513–523. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
  • Simpson, D, Joe, G, Fletcher, B, Hubbard, R, Anglin, M D. A national evaluation of treatment outcomes for cocaine dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999; 56(6):507–514. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
  • Zhang, Z, Friedmann, P, Gerstein, D. Does retention matter? Treatment duration and improvement in drug use. Addiction 2003; 98(5):673–684. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
  • Brecht, M.-L, O'Brien, A, von Mayrhauser, C, Anglin, M D. Methamphetamine use behaviors and gender differences. Addict Behav 2004; 29(1):89–106. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
  • Polcin, D. Drug and alcohol offenders coerced into treatment: a review of modalities and suggestions for research on social model programs. Subst Use Misuse 2001; 36(5):589–608. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
  • Taylor, B, Fitzgerald, N, Hunt, D, Reardon, J, Brownstein, H. ADAM Preliminary 2000 Findings on Drug Use and Drug Markets. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, 2001.
  • Longshore, D, Turner, S, Wenzel, S, Morral, A, Harrell, A, McBride, D, Deschenes, E, Iguchi, M. Drug courts: a conceptual framework. J Drug Issues 2001; 31(1):7–26. [CSA]
  • Rapp, R, Li, L, Siegal, H, DeLiberty, R. Demographic and clinical correlates of client motivation among substance abusers. Health Soc Work 2003; 28(2):107–115. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.