Coerced Treatment for Methamphetamine Abuse: Differential Patient Characteristics and Outcomes

References

• Office of the National Drug Control Policy. National Drug Control Strategy: A Ten-Year Plan. Washington, DC: The White House, 1998, Available at http://www.ncjrs.org/ondcppubs/pdf/strat_pt1.pdf (accessed February 1, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Herz, D. Drugs in the Heartland: Methamphetamine Use in Rural Nebraska. National Institute of Justice Research in Brief: April, 2000. Available at http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/nij/180986.pdf (accessed February 1, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• NIDA Community Epidemiology Work Group (CEWG). Epidemiologic Trends in Drug Abuse Advance Report. Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the National Drug Control Policy. National Drug Control Strategy. Washington, DC: The White House, 2001. Available at http://www.ncjrs.org/ondcppubs/publications/policy/ndcs01/ (accessed February 1, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• National Drug Intelligence Center. National Drug Threat Assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, 2003. Available at http://www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs3/3300/meth.htm (accessed February 1, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992–2000. National Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment Services. DASIS Series S-17 DHHS Publication No. (SMA)02-3727. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Urada, D, Brecht, M-L, Anglin, M D, Hser, Y-I. California alcohol and other drug treatment: trends in client characteristics, treatment progress, service capacity, and utilization. In: A State Treatment and Demand Needs Assessment: Alcohol and Other Drugs. Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, Office ofApplied Research and Analysis. Sacramento, CA: State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, Office of Applied Research and Analysis, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Travis, J, Vareen, D. Final Report, Mehamphetamine Interagency Task Force. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, 2000. Available on the Internet at http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/nij/180155.pdf. Accessed March 21, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Anglin, M D, Perrochet, B. Drug use and crime: a historical review of research conducted by the UCLA drug abuse research center. Subst Use Misuse 1998; 33(9):1871–1914., [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittner, B, Dozier, C. The effects of court-ordered substance abuse treatment in child protective services cases. Social Work 2000; 442(2):131–140.
   Google Scholar
• Farabee, D, Prendergast, M, Anglin, M D. The effective of coerced treatment for drug-abusing offenders. Fed Probat 1998; 62(1):3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Anglin, M D, Hser, Y. Criminal justice and the drug-abusing offender: policy issues of coerced treatment. Behav Sci Law 1991; 9:243–267. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gostin, L. Compulsory treatment for drug-dependent persons: justification for a public health approach to drug dependency. Millbank Quart 1991; 69:561–593. [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leukefeld, C, Tims, F. Compulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, M. The constitutionality of involuntary civil commitment of opiate addicts. J Drug Issues 1988; 18:641–661. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wild, T, Newton-Taylor, B, Alleto, R. Perceived coercion among clients entering substance abuse treatment: Structural and psychological determinants. Addict Behav 1998; 23(1):81–95. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt, J, Buhringer, G, Kaplan, C, Brown, B, Taube, D. The prospects and limitations of compulsory treatment for drug addiction. J Drug Issues 1988; 18(4):505–525. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leon, G, Melnick, G, Kressel, D, Jainchill, N. Circumstances, motivation, readiness and suitability (the CMRS scales): predicting retention in therapeutic community treatment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1994; 20(4):495–515. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joe, G, Simpson, D, Broome, K. Retention and patient engagement models for different treatment modalities in DATOS. Drug Alcohol Depend 1999; 57:113–125. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, D, Joe, G. Motivation as a predictor of early dropout from drug abuse treatment. Psychotherapy 1993; 30(2):357–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brecht, M.-L, Anglin, M D, Wang, J C. Treatment effectiveness for legally coerced vs. voluntary methadone maintenance clients. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1993; 19(1):89–106. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiller, M, Knight, K, Broome, K, Stimpson, D. Legal pressure and treatment retention: a national sample of long-term residential programs. Crim Justice Behav 1998; 25(4):463–481. [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlothlin, W H, Anglin, M D, Wilson, B D. An evaluation of the California Civil Addict Program. NIDA Services Research Monograph Series DHEW Publication No. ADM 78-558. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, N, Flaherty, J. Effectiveness of coerced addiction treatment (alternative consequences). A review of the clinical research. J Subst Abuse Treat 2000; 18:9–16., [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendergast, M, Maugh, T H. Drug courts: diversion that works. Judges J 1995; 34, pp. 10–15, 46–47.
   Google Scholar
• Anglin, M D, Longshore, D, Turner, S, McBride, D, Inciardi, J, Prendergast, M. Studies of the Functioning and Effectiveness of Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime (TASC) Programs: Final Report (National Institute on Drug Abuse Contract N01DA-1-8408. Santa Monica, CA: UCLA Drug Abuse Research Center Los Angeles RAND, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Maugh, T, Anglin, M D. Court-ordered drug treatment does work. Judges J 1994; 33(1): 10–13, 38–40.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, J, Allison, M. Legal coercion and retention in drug abuse treatment. Hosp Commun Psychiatry 1983; 34(12):1145–1149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prendergast, M, Anglin, M D, Wellisch, J. Treatment for drug-abusing offenders under community supervision. Fed Probat 1995; 59(4):66–75.
   Google Scholar
• Belenko, S. Research on drug courts: a critical review. Natl Drug Court Inst Rev 1998; 1:1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project [DCCTAP]. Looking at a Decade of Drug Court. Washington, DC: American University Office of Justice Programs DCCTAP, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Guydish, J, Wolfe, E, Tajima, B, Woods, W. Drug court effectiveness: a review of California evaluation reports, 1995–1999. J Psychoact Drugs 2001; 33(4):369–378. [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry, W C. The Early Drug Courts: Case Studies in Judicial Innovation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. General Accounting Office. Drug Courts: Better DOJ Data Collection and Evaluation Efforts Needed to Measure Impact of Drug Court Programs. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office, 2002. Available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d02434.pdf (accessed February 1, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Zweben, J (1999) . The role of drug courts in methamphetamine treatment. Methamphetamine Abuse. Proceedings from the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment Regional Conference, Hawaii, December, 1999. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, MD
   Google Scholar
• Longshore, D, Evans, E, Urada, D, Teruya, C, Hardy, M, Hser, Y-H, Prendergast, M, Ettner, S. Evaluation of the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act 2002 Report. Los Angeles: UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, S, Costin, L, McFadden, E. Child Welfare and Family Service: Policies and Practice. White Plains, NY: Longman, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Azzi-Lessing, L, Olsen, L. Substance abuse-affected families in the child welfare system: new challenges, new alliances. Social Work 1996; 41(1):15–23. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaffin, M, Kellerher, K, Hollenberg, J. Onset of physical abuse andneglect: psychiatric, substance abuse, and social risk factors from prospective community data. Child Abuse Neglect 1996; 20(2):191–203. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dore, M, Doris, J, Wright, P. Identifying substance abuse in maltreating families: a child welfare challenge. Child Abuse Neglect 1995; 19(5):531–543. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. No Safe Haven: Children of Substance-Abusing Parents. New York: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University, 1999:4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, J, Miller, B. Parenting issues for women with alcohol and other drug problems. In: S Straussner, E Zelvin, eds. Gender Issues in Addictions. New York: Jason Aronson, 1997:123–150.
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, G, Brindis, C, Clayson, Z, Peterson, S. Options for recovery: promoting success among women mandated to treatment. J Psychoact Drugs 1996; 28(1):31–38. [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anglin, M D, Hser, Y.-I, Chou, C.-P. Reliability and validity of retrospective self-report by narcotics addicts. Eval Rev 1993; 17(1):90–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, C.-P, Hser, Y.-I, Anglin, M D. Pattern reliability of narcotics addicts' self-reported data: A confirmatory assessment of construct validity and consistency. Subst Use Misuse 1996; 31(9):1189–1216. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hser, Y.-I, Anglin, M D, Chou, C.-P. Reliability of retrospective self-report by heroin addicts. Psychological assessment. J Consult Clin Psychol 1992; 4(2):207–213.
   Google Scholar
• Wild, T. Compulsory substance-abuse treatment and harm reduction: a critical analysis. Subst Use Misuse 1999; 3(1):83–102.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, J, Alterman, A, Koppenhaver, J, Mulvaney, F, Bovasso, G, Ward, K. Continuous, categorical, and time to event cocaine use outcome variables: degree of intercorrelation and sensitivity to treatment group differences. Drug Alcohol Depend 2001; 62:19–30. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farabee, D, Hser, Y.-I, Anglin, M D, Huang, D. Recidivism among an early cohort of California's Proposition 36 offenders. Criminology & Public Policy. 2004; 3(4):501–522
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, D, Catalano, R, Haggerty, K, Gainey, R, Fleming, C. A meta-analysis of predictors of continued drug use during and after treatment for opiate addiction. Addiction 1998; 93(1):73–92. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, J, Weiss, R. A review of temporal effects and outcome predictors in substance abuse treatment studies with long-term follow-ups. Eval Rev 2001; 25(2):113–161. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendergast, M, Podus, D, Chang, E, Urada, D. The effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: a meta-analysis of comparison group studies. Drug Alcohol Depend 2002; 67:53–72. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brecht, M.-L, von Mayhauser, C, Anglin, M D. Predictors of relapse after treatment for methamphetamine use. J Psychoact Drugs 2000; 32(3):211–220., [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brecht, M.-L, Greenwell, L, von Mayhauser, C, Anglin, M D. Two-year outcomes of treatment for methamphetamine use. J Psychoact Drugs. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Hser, Y.-I, Grella, C, Hsieh, S, Anglin, M D, Brown, B. Prior treatment experience related to process and outcomes in DATOS. Drug Alcohol Depend 1999; 57(2):137–150. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longshore, D. Treatment motivation among Mexican-American drug-using arrestees. Hisp J Behav Sci 1997; 19(2):214–229. [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hser, Y.-I, Anglin, M D, Fletcher, B. Comparative treatment effectiveness. J Subst Abuse Treat 1998; 15(6):513–523. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, D, Joe, G, Fletcher, B, Hubbard, R, Anglin, M D. A national evaluation of treatment outcomes for cocaine dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999; 56(6):507–514. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z, Friedmann, P, Gerstein, D. Does retention matter? Treatment duration and improvement in drug use. Addiction 2003; 98(5):673–684. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brecht, M.-L, O'Brien, A, von Mayrhauser, C, Anglin, M D. Methamphetamine use behaviors and gender differences. Addict Behav 2004; 29(1):89–106. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polcin, D. Drug and alcohol offenders coerced into treatment: a review of modalities and suggestions for research on social model programs. Subst Use Misuse 2001; 36(5):589–608. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B, Fitzgerald, N, Hunt, D, Reardon, J, Brownstein, H. ADAM Preliminary 2000 Findings on Drug Use and Drug Markets. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Longshore, D, Turner, S, Wenzel, S, Morral, A, Harrell, A, McBride, D, Deschenes, E, Iguchi, M. Drug courts: a conceptual framework. J Drug Issues 2001; 31(1):7–26. [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, R, Li, L, Siegal, H, DeLiberty, R. Demographic and clinical correlates of client motivation among substance abusers. Health Soc Work 2003; 28(2):107–115. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar