Characterization of mec1 Kinase-Deficient Mutants and of New Hypomorphic mec1 Alleles Impairing Subsets of the DNA Damage Response Pathway

REFERENCES

• Aboussekhra, A., R. Chanet, Z. Zgaga, C. Cassier-Chauvat, M. Heude, and F. Fabre. 1989. RADH, a gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encoding a putative DNA helicase involved in DNA repair. Characteristics of radH mutants and sequence of the gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 17:7211–7219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allen, J. B., Z. Zhou, W. Siede, E. C. Friedberg, and S. J. Elledge. 1994. The SAD1/RAD53 protein kinase controls multiple checkpoints and DNA damage-induced transcription in yeast. Genes Dev. 8:2416–2428.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bashkirov, V. I., J. S. King, E. V. Bashkirova, J. Schmuckli-Maurer, and W.-D. Heyer. 2000. DNA repair protein Rad55 is a terminal substrate of the DNA damage checkpoints. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:4393–4404.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bentley, N. J., D. A. Holtzman, G. Flaggs, K. S. Keegan, A. Demaggio, J. C. Ford, M. Hoekstra, and A. M. Carr. 1996. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad3 checkpoint gene. EMBO J. 15:6641–6651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brush, G. S., D. M. Morrow, P. Hieter, and T. J. Kelly. 1996. The ATM homologue MEC1 is required for phosphorylation of replication protein A in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:15075–15080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, A. M.. 1997. Control of cell cycle arrest by the Mec1sc/Rad3sp DNA structure checkpoint pathway. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7:93–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chabes, A., V. Domkin, and L. Thelander. 1999. Yeast Sml1, a protein inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 274:36679–36683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., et al.. 1999. Radiation-induced assembly of Rad51 and Rad52 recombination complex requires ATM and c-Abl. J. Biol. Chem. 274:12748–12752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cliby, W. A., C. J. Roberts, K. A. Cimprich, C. M. Stringer, J. R. Lamb, S. L. Schreiber, and S. H. Friend. 1998. Overexpression of a kinase-inactive ATR protein causes sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents and defects in cell cycle checkpoints. EMBO J. 17:159–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Fix, O., and D. Koshland. 1997. The anaphase inhibitor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pds1p is a target of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:14361–14366.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cortez, D., Y. Wang, J. Quin, and S. J. Elledge. 1999. Requirement of ATM-dependent phosphorylation of Brca1 in the DNA damage response to double-strand breaks. Science 286:1162–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critchlow, S. E., and S. P. Jackson. 1998. DNA end-joining: from yeast to man. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23:394–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desany, B. A., A. A. Alcasabas, J. B. Bachant, and S. J. Elledge. 1998. Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev. 12:2956–2970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emili, A.. 1998. MEC1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9p in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell 2:183–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatei, M., D. Young, K. M. Cerosaletti, A. Desia-Mehta, K. S. Spring, S. Kozlov, et al.. 2000. ATM-dependent phosphorylation of nibrin in response to radiation exposure. Nat. Genet. 25:115–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gietz, R. D., and A. Sugino. 1988. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six base-pair restriction sites. Gene 74:527–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwell, P. W., S. L. Kronmal, S. E. Porter, J. Gassenhuber, B. Obermaier, and T. D. Petes. 1995. TEL1, a gene involved in controlling telomere length in S. cerevisiae, is homologous to the human ataxia telangiectasia gene. Cell 82:823–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grushcow, J. M., T. M. Holzen, K. J. Park, T. Weinert, M. Lichten, and D. K. Bishop. 1999. Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint genes MEC1, RAD17 and RAD24 are required for normal meiotic recombination partner choice. Genetics 153:607–620.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halazonetis, T. D., and Y. Shiloh. 1999. Many faces of ATM: Eighth International Workshop on Ataxia-Telangiectasia. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1424:R45–R55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hari, K. L., A. Santerre, J. J. Sekelsky, K. S. McKim, J. B. Boyd, and R. S. Hawley. 1995. The mei-41 gene of D. melanogaster is a structural and functional homolog of the human ataxia telangiectasia gene. Cell 82:815–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith, C. T., and S. L. Schreiber. 1995. PIK-related kinases: DNA repair, recombination, and cell cycle checkpoints. Science 270:50–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knop, M., K. Siegers, G. Pereira, W. Zachariae, B. Winsor, K. Nasmyth, and E. Schiebel. 1999. Epitope tagging of yeast genes using a PCR-based strategy: more tags and improved practical routines. Yeast 15:963–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondo, T., K. Matsumoto, and K. Sugimoto. 1999. Role of a complex containing Rad17, Mec3, and Ddc1 in the yeast DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:1136–1143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., N. S. Y. Ting, L. Zheng, P.-L. Chen, Y. Ziv, Y. Shiloh, E. Y.-H. P. Lee, and W.-H. Lee. 2000. Functional link of BRCA1 and ataxia telangiectasia gene product in DNA damage response. Nature 406:210–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberi, G., I. Chiolo, A. Pellicioli, M. Lopes, P. Plevani, M. Muzi-Falconi, and M. Foiani. 2000. Srs2 DNA helicase is involved in checkpoint response and its regulation requires a functional Mec1-dependent pathway and Cdk1 activity. EMBO J. 19:5027–5038.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lim, D.-S., S.-T. Kim, B. Xu, R. S. Maser, J. Lin, J. H. J. Petrini, and M. B. Kastan. 2000. ATM phosphorylates p95/nbs1 in an S-phase checkpoint pathway. Nature 404:613–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhese, M. P., M. Foiani, M. Muzi Falconi, G. Lucchini, and P. Plevani. 1998. DNA damage checkpoint in budding yeast. EMBO J. 17:5525–5528.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Longhese, M. P., V. Paciotti, H. Neecke, and G. Lucchini. 2000. Checkpoint proteins influence telomeric silencing and length maintenance in budding yeast. Genetics 155:1577–1591.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Longhese, M. P., V. Paciotti, R. Fraschini, P. Plevani, and G. Lucchini. 1997. The novel DNA damage checkpoint protein Ddc1p is phosphorylated periodically during the cell cycle and in response to DNA damage in budding yeast. EMBO J. 16:5216–5226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lowndes, N. F., and J. R. Murguia. 2000. Sensing and responding to DNA damage. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10:17–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallory, J. C., and T. D. Petes. 2000. Protein kinase activity of Tel1p and Mec1p, two Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins related to the human ATM protein kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:13749–13754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyn, M. S.. 1993. High spontaneous intrachromosomal recombination rates in ataxia-telangiectasia. Science 260:1327–1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, C., E. Sonoda, N. Takao, A. Shinohara, K. Yamamoto, and S. Takeda. 2000. The controlling role of ATM in homologous recombinational repair of DNA damage. EMBO J. 19:463–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, D. M., D. A. Tagle, Y. Shiloh, F. S. Collins, and P. Hieter. 1995. TEL1, an S. cerevisiae homolog of the human gene mutated in ataxia telangiectasia, is functionally related to the yeast checkpoint gene MEC1. Cell 82:831–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paciotti, V., G. Lucchini, P. Plevani, and M. P. Longhese. 1998. Mec1p is essential for phosphorylation of the yeast DNA damage checkpoint protein Ddc1p, which physically interacts with Mec3p. EMBO J. 17:101–111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paciotti, V., M. Clerici, G. Lucchini, and M. P. Longhese. 2000. The checkpoint protein Ddc2, functionally related to S. pombe Rad26, interacts with Mec1 and is regulated by Mec1-dependent phosphorylation in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 14:2046–2059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paques, F., and J. E. Haber. 1997. Two pathways for removal of nonhomologous DNA ends during double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:6765–6771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulovich, A. G., and L. H. Hartwell. 1995. A checkpoint regulates the rate of progression through S phase in S. cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Cell 82:841–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulovich, A. G., D. P. Toczyski, and L. H. Hartwell. 1997. When checkpoints fail. Cell 88:315–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlmutter, R. M., and I. J. Alberola. 1996. The use of dominant-negative mutations to elucidate signal transduction pathways in lymphocytes. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 8:285–290.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rose, M. D., F. Winston, and P. Hieter. 1990. Methods in yeast genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, J., and S. P. Jackson. 2000. LCD1: an essential gene involved in checkpoint control and regulation of the MEC1 signaling pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 19:5801–5812.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanchez, Y., B. A. Desany, W. J. Jones, Q. Liu, B. Wang, and S. J. Elledge. 1996. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 271:357–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, Y., J. Bachant, H. Wang, F. H. Hu, D. Liu, M. Tezlaff, and S. J. Elledge. 1999. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by Chk1 and Rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 286:1166–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savitsky, K., et al.. 1995. A single ataxia telangiectasia gene with a product similar to PI-3 kinase. Science 286:1749–1753.
   Google Scholar
• Shafman, T., et al.. 1997. Interaction between ATM protein and c-Abl in response to DNA damage. Nature 387:520–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siede, W., A. S. Friedberg, and E. C. Friedberg. 1993. RAD9-dependent G1 arrest defines a second checkpoint for damaged DNA in the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:7985–7989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Z., D. S. Fay, F. Marini, M. Foiani, and D. F. Stern. 1996. Spk1/Rad53 is regulated by Mec1-dependent protein phosphorylation in DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways. Genes Dev. 10:395–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Z., J. Hsiao, D. S. Fay, and D. F. Stern. 1998. Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint. Science 281:272–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, M. P., C. Venclovas, and K. Fidelis. 1999. A sliding clamp model for the Rad1 family of cell cycle checkpoint proteins. Cell 96:769–770.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thompson, D. A., and F. W. Stahl. 1999. Genetic control of recombination partner preference in yeast meiosis: isolation and characterization of mutants elevated for meiotic unequal sister-chromatid recombination. Genetics 153:621–641.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Umezu, K., N. Sugawara, C. Chen, J. E. Haber, and R. D. Kolodner. 1998. Genetic analysis of yeast RPA1 reveals its multiple functions in DNA metabolism. Genetics 148:989–1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vialard, J. E., C. S. Gilbert, C. M. Green, and N. F. Lowndes. 1998. The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage. EMBO J. 17:5679–5688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wach, A., A. Brachat, R. Pohlmann, and P. Philippsen. 1994. New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 10:1793–1808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waga, S., and B. Stillman. 1998. The DNA replication fork in eukaryotic cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67:721–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinert, T.. 1997. Yeast checkpoint controls and relevance to cancer. Cancer Surv. 29:109–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weinert, T.. 1998. DNA damage and checkpoint pathways: molecular anatomy and interactions with repair. Cell 94:555–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinert, T. A., and L. H. Hartwell. 1988. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 241:317–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinert, T. A., and L. H. Hartwell. 1993. Cell cycle arrest of cdc mutants and specificity of the RAD9 checkpoint. Genetics 134:63–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinert, T. A., G. L. Kiser, and L. H. Hartwell. 1994. Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair. Genes Dev. 8:652–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, X., V. Ranganathan, D. S. Weisman, W. F. Heine, D. N. Ciccone, T. B. O'Neill, K. E. Crick, K. A. Pierce, W. S. Lane, G. Rathbun, D. M. Livingston, and D. T. Weaver. 2000. ATM phosphorylation of Nijmegen breakage syndrome protein is required in a DNA damage response. Nature 405:477–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakian, V. A.. 1995. ATM-related genes: what do they tell us about functions of the human gene?. Cell 82:685–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S., Y. C. Weng, S.-S. F. Yuan, Y.-T. Lin, H.-C. Hsu, S.-C. J. Lin, et al.. 2000. Functional link between ataxia-telangiectasia and Nijmegen breakage syndrome gene products. Nature 405:473–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., E. G. D. Muller, and R. Rothstein. 1998. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol. Cell 2:329–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar