Regulation of TATA-Binding Protein Binding by the SAGA Complex and the Nhp6 High-Mobility Group Protein

REFERENCES

• Agalioti, T., S. Lomvardas, B. Parekh, J. Yie, T. Maniatis, and D. Thanos. 2000. Ordered recruitment of chromatin modifying and general transcription factors to the IFN-beta promoter. Cell 103: 667–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arndt, K. M., S. L. Ricupero, D. M. Eisenmann, and F. Winston. 1992. Biochemical and genetic characterization of a yeast TFIID mutant that alters transcription in vivo and DNA binding in vitro. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12: 2372–2382.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belotserkovskaya, R., D. E. Sterner, M. Deng, M. H. Sayre, P. M. Lieberman, and S. L. Berger. 2000. Inhibition of TATA-binding protein function by SAGA subunits Spt3 and Spt8 at Gcn4-activated promoters. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 634–647.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhaumik, S. R., and M. R. Green. 2002. Differential requirement of SAGA components for recruitment of TATA-box-binding protein to promoters in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22: 7365–7371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhoite, L. T., and D. J. Stillman. 1998. Residues in the Swi5 zinc finger protein that mediate cooperative DNA-binding with the Pho2 homeodomain protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18: 6436–6446.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhoite, L. T., Y. Yu, and D. J. Stillman. 2001. The Swi5 activator recruits the Mediator complex to the HO promoter without RNA polymerase II. Genes Dev. 15: 2457–2469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeke, J. D., F. LaCroute, and G. R. Fink. 1984. A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5′-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance. Mol. Gen. Genet. 197: 345–346.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brownell, J. E., J. Zhou, T. Ranalli, R. Kobayashi, D. G. Edmondson, S. Y. Roth, and C. D. Allis. 1996. Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: a homolog to yeast Gcn5p linking histone acetylation to gene activation. Cell 84: 843–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buratowski, S., S. Hahn, L. Guarente, and P. A. Sharp. 1989. Five intermediate complexes in transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II. Cell 56: 549–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bustin, M. 1999. Regulation of DNA-dependent activities by the functional motifs of the high-mobility-group chromosomal proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19: 5237–5246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosma, M. P., S. Panizza, and K. Nasmyth. 2001. Cdk1 triggers association of RNA polymerase to cell cycle promoters only after recruitment of the mediator by SBF. Mol. Cell 7: 1213–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosma, M. P., T. Tanaka, and K. Nasmyth. 1999. Ordered recruitment of transcription and chromatin remodeling factors to a cell cycle- and developmentally regulated promoter. Cell 97: 299–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costigan, C., D. Kolodrubetz, and M. Snyder. 1994. NHP6A and NHP6B, which encode HMG1-like proteins, are candidates for downstream components of the yeast SLT2 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14: 2391–2403.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cross, F. R. 1997. ‘Marker swap’ plasmids: convenient tools for budding yeast molecular genetics. Yeast 13: 647–653.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Das, D., and W. M. Scovell. 2001. The binding interaction of HMG-1 with the TATA-binding protein/TATA complex. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 32597–32605.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donze, D., C. R. Adams, J. Rine, and R. T. Kamakaka. 1999. The boundaries of the silenced HMR domain in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 13: 698–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley, A. M., C. Rougeulle, and F. Winston. 1999. The Spt components of SAGA facilitate TBP binding to a promoter at a post-activator-binding step in vivo. Genes Dev. 13: 2940–2945.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eberharter, A., D. E. Sterner, D. Schieltz, A. Hassan, J. R. Yates III, S. L. Berger, and J. L. Workman. 1999. The ADA complex is a distinct histone acetyltransferase complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19: 6621–6631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenmann, D. M., K. M. Arndt, S. L. Ricupero, J. W. Rooney, and F. Winston. 1992. SPT3 interacts with TFIID to allow normal transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 6: 1319–1331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gansheroff, L. J., C. Dollard, P. Tan, and F. Winston. 1995. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae SPT7 gene encodes a very acidic protein important for transcription in vivo. Genetics 139: 523–536.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gietz, R. D., and A. Sugino. 1988. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene 74: 527–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampsey, M. 1998. Molecular genetics of the RNA polymerase II general transcriptional machinery. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62: 465–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, J. E., A. M. Myers, T. J. Koerner, and A. Tzagoloff. 1986. Yeast/E. coli shuttle vectors with multiple unique restriction sites. Yeast 2: 163–167.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kassavetis, G. A., C. A. Joazeiro, M. Pisano, E. P. Geiduschek, T. Colbert, S. Hahn, and J. A. Blanco. 1992. The role of the TATA-binding protein in the assembly and function of the multisubunit yeast RNA polymerase III transcription factor, TFIIIB. Cell 71: 1055–1064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, A., T. Miyake, Y. Ohyama, M. Kawaichi, and T. Kokubo. 2001. Mutations in the TATA-binding protein, affecting transcriptional activation, show synthetic lethality with the TAF145 gene lacking the TAF N-terminal domain in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 395–405.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krebs, J. E., M. H. Kuo, C. D. Allis, and C. L. Peterson. 1999. Cell cycle-regulated histone acetylation required for expression of the yeast HO gene. Genes Dev. 13: 1412–1421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruppa, M., R. D. Moir, D. Kolodrubetz, and I. M. Willis. 2001. Nhp6, an HMG1 protein, functions in SNR6 transcription by RNA polymerase III in S. cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 7: 309–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, M. H., J. Zhou, P. Jambeck, M. E. Churchill, and C. D. Allis. 1998. Histone acetyltransferase activity of yeast Gcn5p is required for the activation of target genes in vivo. Genes Dev. 12: 627–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuras, L., and K. Struhl. 1999. Binding of TBP to promoters in vivo is stimulated by activators and requires Pol II holoenzyme. Nature 399: 609–613.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larschan, E., and F. Winston. 2001. The S. cerevisiae SAGA complex functions in vivo as a coactivator for transcriptional activation by Gal4. Genes Dev. 15: 1946–1956.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, M., and K. Struhl. 1997. A severely defective TATA-binding protein-TFIIB interaction does not preclude transcriptional activation in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 1336–1345.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li, Y., S. Bjorklund, Y. W. Jiang, Y. J. Kim, W. S. Lane, D. J. Stillman, and R. D. Kornberg. 1995. Yeast global transcriptional repressors Sin4 and Rgr1 are components of mediator complex/RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 10864–10868.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopez, S., M. Livingstone-Zatchej, S. Jourdain, F. Thoma, A. Sentenac, and M.-C. Marsolier. 2001. High-mobility-group proteins NHP6A and NHP6B participate in activation of the RNA polymerase III SNR6 gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 3096–3104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marcus, G. A., J. Horiuchi, N. Silverman, and L. Guarente. 1996. ADA5/SPT20 links the ADA and SPT genes, which are involved in yeast transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16: 3197–3205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin, M. P., V. L. Gerlach, and D. A. Brow. 2001. A novel upstream RNA polymerase III promoter element becomes essential when the chromatin structure of the yeast U6 RNA gene is altered. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 6429–6439.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nasmyth, K. 1985. At least 1400 base pairs of 5′-flanking DNA is required for the correct expression of the HO gene in yeast. Cell 42: 213–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orphanides, G., T. Lagrange, and D. Reinberg. 1996. The general transcription factors of RNA polymerase II. Genes Dev. 10: 2657–2683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paull, T. T., M. Carey, and R. C. Johnson. 1996. Yeast HMG proteins NHP6A/B potentiate promoter-specific transcriptional activation in vivo and assembly of preinitiation complexes in vitro. Genes Dev. 10: 2769–2781.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pollard, K. J., and C. L. Peterson. 1997. Role for ADA/GCN5 products in antagonizing chromatin-mediated transcriptional repression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 6212–6222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pray-Grant, M. G., D. Schieltz, S. J. McMahon, J. M. Wood, E. L. Kennedy, R. G. Cook, J. L. Workman, J. R. Yates III, and P. A. Grant. 2002. The novel SLIK histone acetyltransferase complex functions in the yeast retrograde response pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22: 8774–8786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh, B. F. 2000. Control of gene expression through regulation of the TATA-binding protein. Gene 255: 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. M., and F. Winston. 1997. Essential functional interactions of SAGA, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae complex of Spt, Ada, and Gcn5 proteins, with the Snf/Swi and Srb/mediator complexes. Genetics 147: 451–465.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rothstein, R. 1991. Targeting, disruption, replacement, and allele rescue: integrative DNA transformation in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 194: 281–302.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanders, S. L., J. Jennings, A. Canutescu, A. J. Link, and P. A. Weil. 2002. Proteomics of the eukaryotic transcription machinery: identification of proteins associated with components of yeast TFIID by multidimensional mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22: 4723–4738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewack, G. F., T. W. Ellis, and U. Hansen. 2001. Binding of TATA binding protein to a naturally positioned nucleosome is facilitated by histone acetylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 1404–1415.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sherman, F. 1991. Getting started with yeast. Methods Enzymol. 194: 1–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shykind, B. M., J. Kim, and P. A. Sharp. 1995. Activation of the TFIID-TFIIA complex with HMG-2. Genes Dev. 9: 1354–1365.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sikorski, R. S., and P. Hieter. 1989. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122: 19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stargell, L. A., and K. Struhl. 1996. A new class of activation-defective TATA-binding protein mutants: evidence for two steps of transcriptional activation in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol 16: 4456–4464.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stargell, L. A., and K. Struhl. 1995. The TBP-TFIIA interaction in the response to acidic activators in vivo. Science 269: 75–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sterner, D. E., R. Belotserkovskaya, and S. L. Berger. 2002. SALSA, a variant of yeast SAGA, contains truncated Spt7, which correlates with activated transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 11622–11627.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sterner, D. E., and S. L. Berger. 2000. Acetylation of histones and transcription-related factors. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 64: 435–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterner, D. E., P. A. Grant, S. M. Roberts, L. J. Duggan, R. Belotserkovskaya, L. A. Pacella, F. Winston, J. L. Workman, and S. L. Berger. 1999. Functional organization of the yeast SAGA complex: distinct components involved in structural integrity, nucleosome acetylation, and TATA- binding protein interaction. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19: 86–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutrias-Grau, M., M. E. Bianchi, and J. Bernues. 1999. High mobility group protein 1 interacts specifically with the core domain of human TATA box-binding protein and interferes with transcription factor IIB within the pre-initiation complex. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 1628–1634.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas, B. J., and R. Rothstein. 1989. Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA. Cell 56: 619–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trievel, R. C., J. R. Rojas, D. E. Sterner, R. N. Venkataramani, L. Wang, J. Zhou, C. D. Allis, S. L. Berger, and R. Marmorstein. 1999. Crystal structure and mechanism of histone acetylation of the yeast GCN5 transcriptional coactivator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 8931–8936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijnen, H., A. Landman, and B. Futcher. 2002. The G1 cyclin Cln3 promotes cell cycle entry via the transcription factor Swi6. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22: 4402–4418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittschieben, B. O., J. Fellows, W. Du, D. J. Stillman, and J. Q. Svejstrup. 2000. Overlapping roles for the histone acetyltransferase activities of SAGA and elongator in vivo. EMBO J. 19: 3060–3068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workman, J. L., and R. E. Kingston. 1998. Alteration of nucleosome structure as a mechanism of transcriptional regulation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67: 545–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Y., P. Eriksson, and D. J. Stillman. 2000. Architectural transcription factors and the SAGA complex function in parallel pathways to activate transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 2350–2357.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yudkovsky, N., J. A. Ranish, and S. Hahn. 2000. A transcription reinitiation intermediate that is stabilized by activator. Nature 408: 225–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., and W. Herr. 2002. A regulated two-step mechanism of TBP binding to DNA: a solvent-exposed surface of TBP inhibits TATA box recognition. Cell 108: 615–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar