199
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Evaluación de la conciencia fonológica en niños y adultos iletrados: ¿es más relevante la tarea o la estructura silábica?

Assessing phonological awareness in children and illiterate adults: What is more relevant the task or the syllabic structure?

, &
Pages 73-86 | Published online: 23 Jan 2014

Referencias

  • Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and lerning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Adrián, J. A., Alegría, J. & Morais, J. (1995). Metaphonological abilities of Spanish illiterate adults. International Journal of Psychology, 3, 329–353.
  • Bertelson, P., De Gelder, B., Tfouni, L. V. & Morais, J. (1989). Metaphonological abilities of adult illiterates: New evidence of heterogeneity. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1, 239–250.
  • Bryant, P. (2002). It doesn't matter whether onset and rime predicts reading better than phoneme awareness does or vice versa. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 41–46.
  • Byrne, B. & Letz, J. (1983). Phonological awareness in reading disabled adults. Australian Journal of Psychology, 35, 185–197.
  • Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B. & Ruano, E. (1996). Batería de Evaluación de los procesos lectores de los niños de Educación Primaria (PROLEC). Madrid: T.E.A., Ediciones.
  • De Gelder, B., Vroomen, J. & Bertelson, P. (1993). The effects of alphabetic-reading competence on language representation in bilingual Chinese subjects. Psychological Research, 55, 315–321.
  • Defior, S. (1996). Una clasificación de las tareas utilizadas en la evaluación de las habilidades fonológica y algunas ideas para su mejora. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 73, 49–63.
  • Durguno Lu, A. Y. & Öney, B. (2002). Phonological awareness in literacy acquisition: Its not only for children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 245–266.
  • Gardner, R. C. (2003). Estadística para psicología usando SPSS para Windows. México: Prentice Hall.
  • Gombert, J. E. (1994). How do illiterate adults react to metalinguistic training? Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 250–269.
  • Goswami, U. (2002a). In the beginning was the rhyme?. A reflection on Hulme, Hatcher, Nation, Brown, Adams, and Stuart (2002). Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 47–57.
  • Goswami, U. (2002b). Phonology, reading development and dyslexia: A cross-linguistic perspective. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 1–23.
  • Greenberg, D., Ehri, L. C. & Perin, D. (1997). Are word-reading processes the same or different in adult literacy students and third-fifth graders matched for reading level? Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 262–275.
  • Guzmán, R. & Jiménez, J. E. (2001). Estudio normativo sobre parámetros psicolingüísticos en niños de 6 a 8 años: la familiaridad subjetiva. Cognitiva, 13, 153–191.
  • Hoffman, L. (1978). Reading errors among skilled and unskilled adult readers. Community/Junior College Research Quarterly, 2, 151–162.
  • Høien, T., Lundberg, I., Stanovich, K. E. & Bjaalid, I. K. (1995). Components of phonological awareness. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 171–188.
  • Jiménez, J. E. (1995). Prueba de conciencia fonémica [Test of phonemic awareness]. En J.E. Jiménez & M. R. Ortiz (Eds.), Conciencia fonológica y aprendizaje de la lectura: teoría, evaluación e intervención (pp. 74–78). Madrid: Síntesis.
  • Jiménez, J. E. & Haro, C. (1995). Effects of word linguistic properties on phonological awareness in Spanish children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 193–201.
  • Jiménez, J. E. & Venegas, E. (2004). Defining phonological awareness and its relationship to reading skills in low-literacy adults. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 798–810.
  • Jiménez, J. E., Venegas, R. & García, E. (en preparación). Are phonological processes the same or different in low literacy adults and children with or without reading disabilities in a consistent orthography? Manuscrito sin publicar.
  • Jiménez, J. E., García, E., Ortiz, M. R., Hernández-valle, I., Guzmán, R., Rodrigo, M., Estévez, A., Díaz, A. & Hernández, S. (2005). Is the deficit in phonological awareness better explained in terms of task differences or effects of syllable structure? Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 267–283.
  • Liberman, I. & Shankweiler, D. (1977). Speech, the alphabet and teaching to read. En L. B. Resnick & P. A. Weaver (Eds.), Theory and practice of early reading (pp. 105–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Liberman, I., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201–212.
  • Lukatela, K., Carello, C., Shankweiler, D. & Liberman, I. Y. (1995). Phonological awareness in illiterates: Observations from Serbo-Croatian. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 463–487.
  • Lundberg, I., Frost, J. & Petersen, O. P. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 263–284.
  • Mcmillan, B. M. (2002). Rhyme and reading: a critical review of the research methodology. Journal of Research in Reading, 25, 4–42.
  • Morais, J., Bertelson, P., Cary, L. & Alegría, J. (1986). Literacy training and speech segmentation. Cognition, 24, 45–64.
  • Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegría, J. & Bertelson, P. (1979). Does Awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneusly? Cognition, 7, 323–331.
  • Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (1999). Psicología de la lectura y procesamiento léxico visual: una revisión de técnicas experimentales y de procedimientos de análisis. Psicológica, 20, 65–90.
  • Pratt, A. & Brady, S. (1988). Relation of phonological awareness to reading disability in children and adults. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 319–323.
  • Read, C. A., Zhang, Y., Nie, H. & Ding, B. (1986). The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic reading. Cognition, 24, 31–44.
  • Stahl, S. A. & Murray, B. A. (1994). Defining phonological awareness and its relationship to early reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 221–234.
  • Treiman, R. (1991). Phonological awareness and its roles in learning to read and spell. En D. J. Sawyer & B. J. Fox (Eds.), Phonological awareness in reading: The evolution of current perspective (pp. 159–189). Nueva York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Treiman, R. (1992). The role of intrasyllabic units in learning to read and spell. En P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 65–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Treiman, R. & Weatherston, S. (1992). Effects of linguistic structure on children's ability to isolate initial consonants. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 174–181.
  • Treiman, R. & Zukowsky, A. (1991). Levels of phonological awareness. En S. A. Brady & D. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy. A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 67–83). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Treiman, R., Zukowsky, A. & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). What happened to the “n” of sink? Children's spelling of final consonant clusters. Cognition, 55, 1–38.
  • Venezky, R. L. & Sabatini, J. P. (2002). Introduction to this special issue: Reading development in adults. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 217–220.
  • Yopp, H. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 159–177.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.