Referencias

• Bakhtin, M. M. (1986) The Problem of Speech Genres. En V. W. Mcgee (Trans.), C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech Genres and other Essays (pp. 60–102). Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (2000). A theory of play and fantasy. En G. Bateson, Steps to an Ecology of Mind (pp. 177–193). St. Albans: Paladin [V. O., 1973].
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, G. (1998). Acting in Classroom Drama. Stoke on Trent: Trentham.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, G. (1979). Towards a Theory of Drama in Education. Londres: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Brecht, B. (1976). Poems 1913–1956. [Editado por J. Willett & R. Mannheim]. Londres: Methuen
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. (2003). Media Education Oxford: Polity Press
   Google Scholar
• Carpay, J. & Van oers, B. (1999). Didactic models and the problem of intertextuality and polyphony. En Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen & R.L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory (pp. 298–313). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Courtney, R. (1968). Play, drama and thought: the intellectual background to dramatic education. Londres: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and Pedagogy. Londres: Routledge and Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Del río, P. & Álvarez, A. (1995). Directivity: The Cultural and Educational Construction of Morality and Agency. Some Questions Arising form the Legacy of Vygotsky. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 26 (4), 384–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engestrom, Y. (1999). Activity Theory and Individual and Social Transformation. En Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen & R.L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theor (pp. 19–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, M. (1997). The Art of Drama Teaching. Londres: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Franks, A. (1997). Drama, Desire and Schooling. Changing English, 4 (1), 131–148.
   Google Scholar
• Franks, A. (1999). Drama, deseo y escolarización. Las fuerzas que impulsan el aprendizaje en alumnos creativos y expresivos. Cultura y Educación, 16, 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Franks, A. & Jones, K. (1999). Lessons from Brecht: a Brechtian approach to drama, texts and education. Research in Drama Education, 4 (2), 181–200.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning. Londres: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Heathcote, D. (1984). Dorothy Heathcote: Collected Writings. [Editado por L. Johnson & C. O'Neill]. Londres: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, R. & Kress, G. R. (1993). Social Semiotics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hornbrook, D. (1989). Education and Dramatic Art. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Idoko, F. (2002). Theatre and Eclecticism: the ‘Tandari’ experience. Research in Drama Education, 7 (2), 169–178.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. Londres: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J. & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal Teaching and Learning: Rhetorics of the science classroom. Londres: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. & Van leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Londres: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Mcentegart, T. (1981). Play and Theatre. SCYPT Journal, 7, 42–48.
   Google Scholar
• O'neill, C. (1995). Drama Worlds: A framework for process drama. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
   Google Scholar
• Samuel, R. (1994). Theatres of Memory. Londres: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Slade, P. (1965). Drama in Education. Londres: Educational Drama Association.
   Google Scholar
• Turvey, A. & Franks, A. (2000). Let's think of it as experimental-learners, teachers and the Globe Theatre. DRAM, The Journal of National Drama, 7 (2), 19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Volosinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language [Trad.: L. Matejka & I. R. Titunik]. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1971) The Psychology of Art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. [Trad. y ed.: A. Kozulin], Cambridge MA: MIT Press. [Trad. cast.: Pensamiento y lenguaje. En Obras Escogidas, Vol. II. Problemas de psicología general (pp. 9–348). Madrid: Visor Distribuciones, 1993].
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). On the problem of the psychology of the actor's creative work. In The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 6 Scientific Legacy (pp. 237–244). Nueva York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press. [V.O., 1936].[Trad. cast.: Psicología de la creatividad del actor. En P. del río (Ed.), La Educación Artística y Creativa. Escritos sobre arte y educación creativa de Lev S. Vygotski. Madrid: Fundación Infancia y Aprendizaje, en prensa].
   Google Scholar
• Vygotski, L. S. & Luria, A. (1994). Tool and Symbol in Child Development. En R. van der veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky Reader (pp. 99–174). Oxford: Blackwell
   Google Scholar
• Way, B. (1967). Development Through Drama. Londres: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. (1983). Drama in a Dramatized Society. En R. Williams, Writing in Society (pp. 11–21). Londres: Verso. [V.O., 1974].
   Google Scholar