Script, Psychological Life Plans, and the Learning Cycle

References

• AdlerA. (1997). Understanding life. Oxford: Oneworld Publishing. (Original work published 1927 as The science of living).
   Google Scholar
• AllenJ.AllenB. (1987). To find/make meaning: Notes on the last permission. Transactional Analysis Journal. 17, 72–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AllenJ.AllenB. (1988). Scripts and permissions: Some unexamined assumptions and connotations. Transactional Analysis Journal, 18, 283–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AllenJ.AllenB. (1997). A new type of transactional analysis and one version of script work with a constructivist sensibility. Transactional Analysis Journal, 27, 89–98.
   Google Scholar
• BerneE. (1961). Transactional analysis in psychotherapy: A systematic individual and social psychiatry. New York: Grove Press.
   Google Scholar
• CornellW. (1988). Life script theory: A critical review from a developmental perspective. Transactional Analysis Journal, 18, 270–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeaconT. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. London: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• DoanR. (1997). Narrative therapy, postmodernism, social constructionism, and constructivism: Discussion and distinctions. Transactional Analysis Journal, 27, 128–133.
   Google Scholar
• EnglishF. (1988). Whither scripts?Transactional Analysis Journal, 18, 294–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ErskineR.ZalcmanM. (1979). The racket system: A model for racket analysis. Transactional Analysis Journal, 9, 51–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FerneyhoughC. (2005, 15 October). What's on your mind?Guardian Review, p. 22.
   Google Scholar
• FransellaF. (1995). George Kelly. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• FriedmanM.ShmuklerD. (1992). The organizing matrix in the evolution of script. Transactional Analysis Journal, 22, 82–88.
   Google Scholar
• GerhardtS. (2004). Why love matters: How affection shapes a baby's brain. London: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• GopnikA.MeltzoffA. N.KuhlP. (1999). The scientist in the crib. New York: Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• HobbsG. (1984). Magister dixit. Transactional Analysis Journal, 14, 174–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KellyG. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• KolbD. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• LahadM. (2000). Creative supervision. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• LakoffG.JohnsonM. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Le GuernicA. (2004). Fairy tales and psychological life plans. Transactional Analysis Journal, 34, 216–222.
   Google Scholar
• Levin-LandheerP. (1982). The cycle of development, Transactional Analysis Journal, 12, 129–139.
   Google Scholar
• LewinM. (2004). What's still radical about transactional analysis?The Script, 34(9), 1, 7.
   Google Scholar
• LodgeD. (2001). Thinks… London: Secker & Warburg.
   Google Scholar
• LodgeD. (2002). Consciousness and the novel: Connected essays. London: Secker & Warburg.
   Google Scholar
• LoriaB. (1995). Structure determinism and script analysis: A bringing forth of alternative realities. Transactional Analysis Journal, 25, 156–168.
   Google Scholar
• MahoneyM. J. (2002). Constructivism and positive psychology. In SnyderC. R.LopezS. J. (Eds.), The handbook of positive psychology (pp. 745–750). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MartinP. (2004). Conflict resolution using transactional analysis and aikido. Transactional Analysis Journal, 34, 229–242.
   Google Scholar
• MeraliZ. (2005). Are you seeing what I am seeing?New Scientist, 2514, 12.
   Google Scholar
• MontuschiF. (2004). Script interventions on the school setting. Transactional Analysis Journal, 54, 205–208.
   Google Scholar
• NapperR.NewtonT. (2000). Tactics-transactional analysis concepts for all trainers, teachers and tutors + insight into collaborative learning strategies. Ipswich: TA Resources.
   Google Scholar
• NewtonT.BarrowG. (2005). The health system. In AllenP. (Ed.), World TA conference papers [CD-ROM]. Edinburgh: Institute of Transactional Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• ParryA. (1997). Why we tell stories: The narrative construction of reality. Transactional Analysis Journal, 27, 118–127.
   Google Scholar
• RissmanA. (1975). Trilog. Transactional Analysis Journal, 5, 170–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShulmanM. (2002). The passion to know. In SnyderC. R.LopezS. J. (Eds.), The handbook of positive psychology (pp. 313–326). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SillsCSaltersD. (1991). The comparative script system. ITA News, 31, 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• StemD. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• SternD. (1990). Diary of a baby. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• SummersG.TudorK. (2000). Cocreative transactional analysis. Transactional Analysis Journal, 30, 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• TempleS. (1997). Lifelong learning: Growthful spiral or vicious cycle? [Handout]. Unpublished material.
   Google Scholar
• WoodD. (1998, 10 October). The quality of meeting: An exploration of the role of attunement. Workshop presented at the TA in Education Conference sponsored by the Institute of Transactional Analysis, Bristol, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• WoodsM. F. (1982). Personality and learning: The Rissman trilog and the experiential learning cycle. Transactional Analysis Journal, 12, 153–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZalcmanM. (1990). Game analysis and racket analysis: Overview, critique, and future developments. Transactional Analysis Journal, 20, 4–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar