Interrelations of Growth in Letter Naming and Sound Fluency in Kindergarten and Implications for Subsequent Reading Fluency

References

• Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• AIMSweb. (2012). AIMSweb growth table: Reading CBM. Retrieved from https://aimsweb.pearson.com
   Google Scholar
• AIMSweb. (2016). AIMSweb national norms tables (2016–2017). Retrieved from www.aimsweb.pearson.com.
   Google Scholar
• Al Otaiba, S., Folsom, J. S., Schatschneider, C., Wanzek, J., Greulich, L., Meadows, J. … Connor, C. M. (2011). Predicting first-grade reading performance from kindergarten response to Tier 1 instruction. Exceptional Children, 77, 453–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Otaiba, S. & Fuchs, D. (2002). Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 300–316. doi:10.1177/07419325020230050501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker, (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243–277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Vermeulen, K., & Fulton, C. M. (2006). Paths to reading comprehension in at-risk second-grade readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 334–351. doi:10.1177/0022219406039004­0701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertin, P., Perlman, E., & Wood, J. M. (1998). Preventing academic failure. New York, NY: Monroe Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, A. G. (2003). Prediction of first-grade reading achievement: A comparison of fall and winter kindergarten screenings. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26(3), 189–200. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1593651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, S. R., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Bidirectional relations of phonological sensitivity and prereading abilities: Evidence from a preschool sample. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70(2), 117–141. doi:10.1006/jecp.1998.2450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1989). Phonemic awareness and letter knowledge in the child's acquisition of the alphabetic principle. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 313–323. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.81.3.313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, L. P., Speece, D., Silverman, R., Ritchey, K. D., Schatschneider, C., Cooper, D. H., … Jacobs, D. (2010). Validation of a supplemental reading intervention for first-grade children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 402–417. doi:10.1177/0022219409355475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemens, N. H., Hilt-Panahon, A., Shapiro, E. S., & Yoon, M. (2012). Tracing student responsiveness to intervention with early literacy skills indicators: Do they reflect growth toward text reading outcomes? Reading Psychology, 33(1–2), 47–77. doi:10.1080/02702711.2011.630608
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, K. D., Biancarosa, G., Schaper, A., & Reed, D. K. (2014). Examiner error in curriculum-based measurement of oral reading. Journal of School Psychology, 52, 361–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri, (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3–40). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (2002). Phases of acquisition in learning to read words and implications for teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology: Monograph Series, 1, 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., & Saltmarsh, J. (1995). Beginning readers outperform older disabled readers in learning to read words by sight. Reading and Writing, 7(3), 295–326. doi:10.1007/bf03162082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellefson, M. R., Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2009). Learning to label letters by sounds or names: A comparison of England and the United States. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(3), 323–341. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, J., Lee, S. W., & Tollefson, N. (2001). A reliability and validity study of the dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills—modified. School Psychology Review, 30, 33–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelmann, S., & Bruner, E. C. (2002). Reading mastery plus. Columbus, OH: SRA McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, M. A., Bell, M., Shaw, D., Moretti, S., & Page, J. (2006). Letter names, letter sounds and phonological awareness: An examination of kindergarten children across letters and of letters across children. Reading and Writing, 19(9), 959–989. doi:10.1007/s11145-006-9026-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FASTbridge. (2015). FASTbridge Learning (assessment suite). Retrieved from http://www.fastbridge.org
   Google Scholar
• Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2013). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller, (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed., pp. 439–492). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Foorman, B. R., Breier, J. I., & Fletcher, J. M. (2003). Interventions aimed at improving reading success: An evidence-based approach. Developmental Neuropsychology, 24(2-3), 613–639. doi:10.1080/87565641.2003.9651913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foorman, B. R., Herrera, S., Petscher, Y., Mitchell, A., & Truckenmiller, A. (2015). The structure of oral language and reading and their relation to comprehension in kindergarten through Grade 2. Reading and Writing, 28(5), 655–681. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9544-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foulin, J. N. (2005). Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing, 18(2), 129–155. doi:10.1007/s11145-004-5892-2
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1999). Monitoring student progress toward the development of reading competence: A review of three forms of classroom-based assessment. School Psychology Review, 28, 659–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2004). Determining adequate yearly progress from kindergarten through Grade 6 with curriculum-based measurement. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 29(4), 25–37. doi:10.1177/073724770402900405
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Al Otaiba, S., Thompson, A., Yen, L., McMaster, K. N. … Yang, N. J. (2001). K-PALS: Helping kindergartners with reading readiness: Teachers and researchers in partnerships. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(4), 76–80.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., Cui, Y., & Papadopoulos, T. C. (2013). Why is rapid automatized naming related to reading? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(1), 218–225. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., Kirby, J. R., & Stephenson, K. (2008). Rapid naming components and their relationship with phonological awareness, orthographic knowledge, speed of processing, and different reading outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(4), 325–350. doi:10.1080/10888430802378518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C. M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, W. D. (2008). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide. (NCEE 2009-4045). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/rti_reading_pg_021809.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (2011). DIBELS Next assessment manual. Eugene, OR: Dynamic Measurement Group.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, B., Smolkowski, K., & Vadasy, P. (2011). Evaluating the effectiveness of Read Well Kindergarten. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4(1), 53–86. doi:10.1080/19345747.2010.488716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 636–644. doi:10.1598/rt.59.7.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, S. A., Burgess, S. R., Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (2000). Explaining social class differences in growth of reading skills from beginning kindergarten through fourth-grade: The role of phonological awareness, rate of access, and print knowledge. Reading and Writing, 12(1–2), 99–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, F. L., Tortorelli, L. S., & Invernizzi, M. A. (2014). An investigation of factors associated with letter-sound knowledge at kindergarten entry. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29, 182–192. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. F., Torgesen, J. K., Lane, H. B., & Turner, S. J. (2012). Relations among reading skills and sub-skills and text-level reading proficiency in developing readers. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 483–507. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9283-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, C., Bowyer-Crane, C., Carroll, J. M., Duff, F. J., & Snowling, M. J. (2012). The causal role of phoneme awareness and letter-sound knowledge in learning to read: Combining intervention studies with mediation analyses. Psychological Science, 23(6), 572–577. doi:10.1177/0956797611435921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2013). Learning to read: What we know and what we need to understand better. Child Development Perspectives, 7(1), 1–5. doi:10.1111/cdep.12005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzir, T., Kim, Y., Wolf, M., O'Brien, B., Kennedy, B., Lovett, M., & Morris, R. (2006). Reading fluency: The whole is more than the parts. Annals of Dyslexia, 56(1), 51–82. doi:10.1007/s11881-006-0003-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. S., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., & Foorman, B. (2010). Does growth rate in oral reading fluency matter in predicting reading comprehension achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 652–667. doi:10.1037/a0019643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, J. R., Georgiou, G. K., Martinussen, R., & Parrila, R. (2010). Naming speed and reading: From prediction to instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 341–362. doi:10.1598/rrq.45.3.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lervåg, A., & Hulme, C. (2009). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) taps a mechanism that places constraints on the development of early reading fluency. Psychological Science, 20(8), 1040–1048. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02405.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, I., Shatil-Carmon, S., & Asif-Rave, O. (2006). Learning of letter names and sounds and their contribution to word recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93(2), 139–165. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2005.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., & Doi, L. M. (1999). See Dick RAN: Rapid naming and the longitudinal prediction of reading subskills in first and second graders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 129–157.
   Google Scholar
• McArdle, J. J. (2009). Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 577–605. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBride-Chang, C. (1999). The ABCs of the ABCs: The development of letter-name and letter-sound knowledge. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45(2), 285–308.
   Google Scholar
• Mellard, D. F., McKnight, M., & Woods, K. (2009). Response to intervention screening and progress-monitoring practices in 41 local schools. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(4), 186–195. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00292.x
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., & Curran, P. J. (1997). General longitudinal modeling of individual differences in experimental designs: A latent variable framework for analysis and power estimation. Psychological Methods, 2(4), 371–402. doi:10.1037//1082-989x.2.4.371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• NCS Pearson. (2003a). Letter Sound Fluency (assessment probes). Retrieved from www.aimsweb.com
   Google Scholar
• NCS Pearson. (2003b). Letter Naming Fluency (assessment probes). Retrieved from www.aimsweb.com
   Google Scholar
• NCS Pearson. (2012a). AIMSweb: Test of Early Literacy administration and scoring guide. Retrieved from www.aimsweb.com
   Google Scholar
• NCS Pearson. (2012b). AIMSweb technical manual. Available from www.aimsweb.com
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. R., Benner, G. J., & Gonzalez, J. (2003). Learner characteristics that influence the treatment effectiveness of early literacy interventions: A meta-analytic review. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(4), 255–267. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00080
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. R., Cooper, P., & Gonzalez, J. (2004). Stepping Stones to Literacy. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, R. E., & Jenkins, J. R. (1999). Prediction of reading disabilities in kindergarten and first grade. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(2), 159–197. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0302_4
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petursdottir, A. L., McMaster, K., McComas, J. J., Bradfield, T., Braganza, V., Koch-McDonald, J. … Scharf, H. (2009). Brief experimental analysis of early reading interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 215–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piasta, S. B., Petscher, Y., & Justice, L. M. (2012). How many letters should preschoolers in public programs know? The diagnostic efficiency of various preschool letter-naming benchmarks for predicting first-grade literacy achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 945–958. doi:10.1037/a0027757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piasta, S. B., Purpura, D. J., & Wagner, R. K. (2010). Fostering alphabet knowledge development: A comparison of two instructional approaches. Reading and Writing, 23(6), 607–626. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9174-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piasta, S. B., & Wagner, R. K. (2010a). Developing early literacy skills: A meta-analysis of alphabet learning and instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 8–38. doi:10.1598/rrq.45.1.2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piasta, S. B., & Wagner, R. K. (2010b). Learning letter names and sounds: Effects of instruction, letter type, and phonological processing skill. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(4), 324–344. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.12.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchey, K. D., & Speece, D. L. (2006). From letter names to word reading: The nascent role of sublexical fluency. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(3), 301–327. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sáez, L., Nese, J. F., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2016). Individual differences in kindergarten through grade 2 fluency relations. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 100–109. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.05.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, S. J., & Flor, R. F. (1997). The importance of automaticity for developing expertise in reading. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 13(2), 107–121. doi:10.1080/1057356970130202
   Google Scholar
• Santi, K. L., Foorman, B. R., York, M., & Francis, D. J. (2009). The timing of early reading assessment in kindergarten. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(4), 217–227. doi:10.2307/27740374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatschneider, C., Carlson, C. D., Francis, D. J., Foorman, B. R., & Fletcher, J. M. (2002). Relationship of rapid automatized naming and phonological awareness in early reading development: Implications for the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 245–256. doi:10.1177/002221940203500306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Carlson, C. D., & Foorman, B. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 265–282. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatschneider, C., Wagner, R. K., & Crawford, E. C. (2008). The importance of measuring growth in response to intervention models: Testing a core assumption. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(3), 308–315. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72(2), 95–129. doi:10.1006/jecp.1998.2481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (2008). Orthographic learning, phonological recoding, and self-teaching. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 36, 31–82. doi:10.1016/s0065-2407(08)00002-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speece, D. L., Mills, C., Ritchey, K. D., & Hillman, E. (2003). Initial evidence that letter fluency tasks are valid indicators of early reading skill. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 223–233. doi:10.1177/002246690303600403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speece, D. L., & Ritchey, K. D. (2005). A longitudinal study of the development of oral reading fluency in young children at risk for reading failure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 387–399. doi:10.1177/00222194050380050201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stage, S. A., Sheppard, J., Davidson, M. M., & Browning, M. M. (2001). Prediction of first-graders’ growth in oral reading fluency using kindergarten letter fluency. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 225–237. doi:10.1016/s0022-4405(01)00065-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stecker, P. M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 795–819. doi:10.1002/pits.20113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stecker, P. M., & Lembke, E. S. (2011). Advanced applications of CBM in reading (K-6): Instructional decision-making strategies manual. Washington, DC: National Center on Student Progress Monitoring & U.S. Office of Special Education Programs.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Herron, J., & Lindamood, P. (2010). Computer-assisted instruction to prevent early reading difficulties in students at risk for dyslexia: Outcomes from two instructional approaches. Annals of Dyslexia, 60(1), 40–56. doi:10.1007/s11881-009-0032-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2003). The role of letter names in the acquisition of literacy. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 31, 105–135. doi:10.1016/s0065-2407(03)31003-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., Pennington, B. F., Shriberg, L. D., & Boada, R. (2008). Which children benefit from letter names in learning letter sounds? Cognition, 106, 1322–1338. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Oregon. (2014). EasyCBM (assessment measures). Retrieved from www.easycbm.com
   Google Scholar
• Vadasay, P., Wayne, S., O'Connor, R., Jenkins, J., Pool, K., Firebaugh, M., & Peyton, J. (2004). Sound Partners: A tutoring program in phonics-based early reading. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
   Google Scholar
• Vaessen, A., Gerretsen, P., & Blomert, L. (2009). Naming problems do not reflect a second independent core deficit in dyslexia: Double deficits explored. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(2), 202–221. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpe, R. J., Burns, M. K., DuBois, M., & Zaslofsky, A. F. (2011). Computer-assisted tutoring: Teaching letter sounds to kindergarten students using incremental rehearsal. Psychology in the Schools, 48, 332–342. doi:10.1002/pits.20557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73–87. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.30.1.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, D. J., Price, G. G., & Gillingham, M. G. (1988). The critical but transitory importance of letter naming. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 108–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. A. (2002). Fundations: Wilson language basics for K–3. Oxford, MA: Wilson Language Training Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M., Bowers, P. G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 211–239. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0503_2
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., & Kwok, O. (2012). Using SEM to analyze complex survey data: A comparison between design-based single-level and model-based multi-level approaches. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19(1), 16–35. doi:10.1080/10705511.2012.634703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar