188
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Indian Medical Undergraduates’ Perceptions of Effective Teaching Methods: A Cross-Sectional Study

ORCID Icon, , , , , , & show all
Pages 473-479 | Published online: 11 May 2021

References

  • National Medical Commission. Mission and vision. 2020 [cited March 20, 2021]; Available from: https://www.nmc.org.in/about-nmc. Accessed May 7, 2021.
  • Amaranathan A, Dharanipragada K, Lakshminarayanan S. Medical students’ perception of the educational environment in a tertiary care teaching hospital in India. Natl Med J India. 2018;31(4):231–236. doi:10.4103/0970-258X.258226
  • Preethi GP, Menezes V, Srikanth AMS, Jnaneshwara PS. Medical students’ perception of their educational environment. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(1):103–107. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2014/5559.3944
  • Nor Iza AR, Aniza AA, Zulkifli Z, et al. Perceptions of students in different phases of medical education of the educational environment: University Sultan Zainal Abidin. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2015;6:211–222. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S78838
  • Xin X, Daxing W, Zhao X, et al. Relation of perceptions of educational environment with mindfulness among Chinese medical students: a longitudinal study. Med Educ. 2016;21:30664. doi:10.3402/meo.v21.30664
  • Papanna KM, Kulkarni V, Tanvi D, et al. Perceptions and preferences of medical students regarding teaching methods in a Medical College, Mangalore, India. Afr Health Sci. 2013;13(3):808–813. doi:10.4314/ahs.v13i3.41
  • Mishra H, Kumar V, Modi PK. Comparison of different teaching methodologies in a medical college in North India. IJBAMR. 2013;2(6):464–469.
  • Sahu DR, Supe AN. The art and science of presentation: 35-mm slides. J Postgrad Med. 2000;46(4):280–285.
  • Estes A, Ressler S, Welch R, Hanus J. Seminar on communication skills. Exceed Teaching Workshop 2009. [cited December 30, 2020]. Available from: https://slideplayer.com/slide/2509710/. Accessed May 7, 2021.
  • Yao JE, Ouyang JR, Wang H. A farewell to the traditional instructional media and technologies in the new millennium. 2000 [cited December 30, 2020]. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED444466.pdf. Accessed May 7, 2021.
  • Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. Microsoft PowerPoint. Encyclopedia Britannica. 2019; [cited January 21, 2021]; Available from: https://www.britannica.com/technology/Microsoft-PowerPoint. Accessed May 7, 2021.
  • Introduction to PowerPoint [Online]. Microsoft educator center. 2021. [cited March 21, 2021]. Available from: https://education.microsoft.com/en-us/resource/a2500c7b. Accessed May 7, 2021.
  • Prasad S, Roy B, Smith M. The art and science of presentation: electronic presentations. J Postgrad Med. 2000;46:193–198.
  • Ljungdahl RT. Technology Integration in the Teacher Preparation Program and Public Schools in Sam Houston Center for Professional Development and Educational Partnerships at Sam Houston State University. Vol. 9982142. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing;2000. [cited December 30, 2020]. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/docview/304646682. Accessed May 7, 2021.
  • Ankad RB, Shashikala GV, Herur A, Manjula R, Chinagudi S, Patil S. PowerPoint presentation in learning physiology by undergraduates with different learning styles. Adv Physiol Educ. 2015;39(4):367–371. doi:10.1152/advan.00119.2015
  • Pedras MJ, Horton J. Using technology to enhance teacher preparation. Paper presented at the Northwest Association of Teacher Educators Annual Conference 1996. [cited February 2, 2021]. Available from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED395929.pdf. Accessed May 7, 2021.
  • Arriesgado A. Everything you need to know about PPT: what is a PowerPoint presentation, and how do you create one? [Internet]. Present better. March, 2018. [cited December 30, 2020]; Available from: https://24slides.com/presentbetter/what-is-powerpoint-presentation/. Accessed May 7, 2021.
  • Novelli Ethel LB, Fernandes Ana AH. Students’ preferred teaching techniques for biochemistry in biomedicine and medicine courses. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2007;35(4):263–266. doi:10.1002/bmb.73
  • Seth V, Upadhyaya P, Ahmad M, Kumar V. Impact of various lecture delivery methods in pharmacology. EXCLI J. 2010;9:96–101.
  • Seth V, Upadhyaya P, Ahmad M, Kumar V. An assessment of teachers’ preference for lecture delivery methods in medical education. Educ Res Rev. 2010;5(9):533–537.
  • Baxi SN, Shah CJ, Parmar RD, Parmar D, Tripathi CB. Students’ perception of different teaching aids in a medical college. AJHPE. 2009;1(1):15–16.
  • Vikas S, Prerna U, Mushtaq A, Vijay M. PowerPoint or chalk and talk: perceptions of medical students versus dental students in a medical college in India. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2010;1:11–16. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S12154
  • Chaudry R, Dullo P, Gupta U. Attitude of 1st MBBS medical students about two different visual aids in physiology lectures. Pak J Physiol. 2009;5(2):94–96.
  • Ahmed C. PowerPoint versus traditional overheads: which is more effective for learning? Conference for the South Dakota Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation. 1998 [cited December 30, 2020]. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED429037.pdf. Accessed May 7, 2021.
  • Shallcross DE, Harrison TG. Lectures: electronic presentations versus CNT– a chemist’s view. Chem Educ Res Pract. 2007;8:73–79. doi:10.1039/B6RP90021F