Consumers’ Implicit Motivation Of Purchasing Luxury Brands: An EEG Study

References

• Shukla P, Purani K. Comparing the importance of luxury value perceptions in cross-national contexts. J Bus Res. 2012;65(10):1417–1424. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla P. Status consumption in cross‐national context Socio‐psychological, brand and situational antecedents. Int Marketing Rev. 2016;27(1):108–129. doi:10.1108/02651331011020429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tynan C, McKechnie S, Chhuon C. Co-creating value for luxury brands. J Bus Res. 2010;63(11):1156–1163. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan L, He Y. Understanding luxury consumption in China: consumer perceptions of best-known brands. J Bus Res. 2012;65(10):1452–1460. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman GM, Shapiro C. Foreign counterfeiting of status goods. Q J Econ. 1988;103(1):79–100. doi:10.2307/1882643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox K, Kim HM, Sen S. Why do consumers buy counterfeit luxury brands? J Marketing Res. 2009;46(2):247–259. doi:10.1509/jmkr.46.2.247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plassmann H, Ramsøy TZ, Milosavljevic M. Branding the brain: a critical review and outlook. J Consum Psychol. 2012;22(1):18–36. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han YJ, Nunes JC, Drèze X. Signaling status with luxury goods: the role of brand prominence. J Mark. 2013;74(4):1547–7185.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang Y, Ko E, Megehee CM. When higher prices increase sales: how chronic and manipulated desires for conspicuousness and rarity moderate price’s impact on choice of luxury brands. J Bus Res. 2014;67(9):1912–1920. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozharliev R, Verbeke WJMI, Strien JWV, Bagozzi RP. Merely being with you increases my attention to luxury products: using EEG to understand consumers’ emotional experience of luxury branded products. J Marketing Res. 2015;52(4):150409072827005. doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plassmann H, Venkatraman V, Huettel S, Yoon C. Consumer neuroscience: applications, challenges, and possible solutions. J Marketing Res. 2015;52(4):150109125622007. doi:10.1509/jmr.14.0048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijksterhuis A. Think different: the merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004;87(5):586. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.58615535773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berns GS, Moore SE. A neural predictor of cultural popularity. J Consum Psychol. 2012;22(1):154–160. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thayer RE. Personality and discrepancies between verbal reports and physiological measures of private emotional experiences. J Pers. 1971;39(1):57–69.5100710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain L, Broderick AJ. The application of physiological observation methods to emotion research. Qual Market Res. 2007;10(2):199–216(118). doi:10.1108/13522750710740853
   Google Scholar
• Ahlert D, Kenning P, Plassmann H. A Window to the Consumer’s Mind: Application of Functional Brain Imaging Techniques to Advertising Research. DUV; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon C, Gutchess AH, Feinberg F, Polk TA. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of neural dissociations between brand and person judgments. J Consum Res. 2006;33(1):31–40. doi:10.1086/jcr.2006.33.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz D. The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opin Q. 1960;24(2):163–204. doi:10.1086/266945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Chaiken S. Attitude Structure and Function. L. Erlbaum Associates; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Shavitt S. The role of attitude objects in attitude functions. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1990;26(2):124–148. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(90)90072-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MB, Bruner JS, White RW. Opinions and personality. Oxford; 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Grewal R, Mehta R, Kardes FR. The timing of repeat purchases of consumer durable goods: the role of functional bases of consumer attitudes. J Marketing Res. 2013;XLI(1):101–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian Q, Forsythe S. Purchase intention for luxury brands: a cross cultural comparison. J Bus Res. 2012;65(10):1443–1451. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin SAA. The potential of social media for luxury brand management. Marketing Intell Plann. 2012;30(7):687–699. doi:10.1108/02634501211273805
   Google Scholar
• Schade M, Hegner S, Horstmann F, Brinkmann N. The impact of attitude functions on luxury brand consumption: an age-based group comparison. J Bus Res. 2016;69:1. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois B, Duquesne P. The market for luxury goods: income versus culture. Eur J Mark. 1993;27(1):35–44. doi:10.1108/03090569310024530
   Google Scholar
• Snyder M, Debono KG. Appeals to image and claims about quality: understanding the psychology of advertising. J Personality Social Psychol. 1985;49(3):586–597. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai KY, Zaichkowsky JL. Brand imitation: do the Chinese have different views? Asia Pacif J Manage. 1999;16(2):179–192. doi:10.1023/A:1015482707900
   Google Scholar
• Bearden WO, Etzel MJ. Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. J Consum Res. 1982;9(2):183–194. doi:10.1086/jcr.1982.9.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han YJ, Nunes JC, Drèze X. Signaling status with luxury goods: the role of brand prominence. J Mark. 2010;74(4):15–30. doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.4.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisend M, Schuchert-Güler P. Explaining counterfeit purchases: a review and preview. Acad Marketing Sci Rev. 2006;2006(12):1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Chen M, Ma Q, Li M, Lai H, Wang X, Shu L. Cognitive and emotional conflicts of counter-conformity choice in purchasing books online: an event-related potentials study. Biol Psychol. 2010;85(3):437–445. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.09.00620858526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon C, Gonzalez R, Bechara A, et al. Decision neuroscience and consumer decision making. Mark Lett. 2012;23(2):473–485. doi:10.1007/s11002-012-9188-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smidts A, Ming H, Sanfey AG, et al. Advancing consumer neuroscience. Mark Lett. 2014;25(3):257–267. doi:10.1007/s11002-014-9306-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Yoon C. Introduction to the journal of marketing research special issue on neuroscience and marketing. J Marketing Res. 2015;52(4):423–426. doi:10.1509/0022-2437-52.4.423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin J, Wang C, Yu L, Ma Q. Extending or creating a new brand: evidence from a study on event-related potentials. Neuroreport. 2015;26(10):572–577. doi:10.1097/WNR.000000000000039026053698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Meng L, Liu M, Wang Q, Ma Q. How do social-based cues influence consumers’ online purchase decisions? An event-related potential study. Electron Commerce Res. 2016;16(1):1–26. doi:10.1007/s10660-015-9209-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatraman V, Dimoka A, Pavlou PA, et al. Predicting advertising success beyond traditional measures: new insights from neurophysiological methods and market response modeling. J Marketing Res. 2015;52(4):150619071651008. doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boksem MAS, Smidts A. Brain responses to movie trailers predict individual preferences for movies and their population-wide commercial success. J Marketing Res. 2015;52(4):150619071651008. doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Q, Wang X, Dai S, Shu L. Event-related potential N270 correlates of brand extension. Neuroreport. 2007;18(10):1031–1034. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e3281667d5917558290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Q, Wang X, Shu L, Dai S. P300 and categorization in brand extension. Neurosci Lett. 2008;431(1):57–61. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2007.11.02218155837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Ma Q, Wang C. N400 as an index of uncontrolled categorization processing in brand extension. Neurosci Lett. 2012;525(1):76–81. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2012.07.04322884930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Q, Wang C, Wang X. Two-stage categorization in brand extension evaluation: electrophysiological time course evidence. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e114150–e114150. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.011415025438152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schupp HT, Cuthbert BN, Bradley MM, Cacioppo JT, Ito T, Lang PJ. Affective picture processing: the late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology. 2000;37(2):257–261.10731776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hooff JC, Crawford H, Van Vugt M. The wandering mind of men: ERP evidence for gender differences in attention bias towards attractive opposite sex faces. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011;6(4):477–485. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq06620601424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite J, Carvalho S, Galdo-Alvarez S, Alves J, Sampaio A, Gonçalves ÓF. Affective picture modulation: valence, arousal, attention allocation and motivational significance. Int J Psychophysiol. 2012;83(3):375–381. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.12.00522226675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein JR, Van Petten C. Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiology. 2008;45(1):152–170. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00602.x17850238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spapé MM, Band GP, Hommel B. Compatibility-sequence effects in the Simon task reflect episodic retrieval but not conflict adaptation: evidence from LRP and N2. Biol Psychol. 2011;88(1):116–123. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.07.00121767598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson MJ, Clayson PE, Baldwin SA. Performance monitoring following conflict: internal adjustments in cognitive control? Neuropsychologia. 2012;50(3):426–433. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.02122234168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas M, Hillyard SA. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science. 1980;207(4427):203–205. doi:10.1126/science.73506577350657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugg MD. The Effects of semantic priming and word repetition on event-related potentials. Psychophysiology. 1985;22(6):642–647. doi:10.1111/psyp.1985.22.issue-64089090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proverbio AM, Riva F. RP and N400 ERP components reflect semantic violations in visual processing of human actions. Neurosci Lett. 2009;459(3):142–146. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2009.05.01219427368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White KR, Crites SL, Taylor JH, Corral G. Wait, what? Assessing stereotype incongruities using the N400 ERP component. Social Cognit Affective Neurosci. 2009;4(2):191. doi:10.1093/scan/nsp004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brink DVD, Berkum JJAV, Bastiaansen MCM, et al. Empathy matters: ERP evidence for inter-individual differences in social language processing. Social Cognit Affective Neurosci. 2010;7(2):173–183. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Kendrick KM, Yu R. Social conflicts elicit an N400-like component. Neuropsychologia. 2014;65:211–220. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.03225446967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taake I, Jaspers-Fayer F, Liotti M. Early frontal responses elicited by physical threat words in an emotional Stroop task: modulation by anxiety sensitivity. Biol Psychol. 2009;81(1):48–57. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.01.00619428968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring DR, Taylor JH, White KR, Crites SL Jr. Electrophysiological responses to evaluative priming: the LPP is sensitive to incongruity. Emotion. 2011;11(4):794. doi:10.1037/a002280421517156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajcak G, Moser JS, Simons RF. Attending to affect: appraisal strategies modulate the electrocortical response to arousing pictures. Emotion. 2006;6(3):517. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.6.3.51716938092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen N-S, Chen K-H, Liu EH. Emotional modulation of the late positive potential (LPP) generalizes to Chinese individuals. Int J Psychophysiol. 2010;75(3):319–325. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.12.01420079772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geck C. Deluxe: how luxury lost its luster. Penguin Books. 2008;132(11):78.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhouse SW, Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika. 1959;24(2):95–112. doi:10.1007/BF02289823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semlitsch HV, Anderer P, Schuster P, Presslich O. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology. 1986;23(6):695–703. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00696.x3823345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton TW, Bentin S, Berg P, et al. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology. 2000;37(2):127–152. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.372012710731765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van D, Van Berkum JJ, Bastiaansen MC, et al. Empathy matters: ERP evidence for inter-individual differences in social language processing. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012;7(2):173–183. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq09421148175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph H, Anna W, Greg HP, Bartholow BD. The negativity bias in affective picture processing depends on top-down and bottom-up motivational significance. Emotion. 2014;14(5):940–949. doi:10.1037/a003679124866528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Q, Hu Y, Jiang S, Meng L. The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the ultimatum game: an ERP study. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:77. doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.0007725805967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telpaz A, Webb R, Levy DJ. Using EEG to predict consumers’ future choices. J Marketing Res. 2015. doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil J. Why we believe in democracy: testing theories of attitude functions and democracy 1. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1992;22(6):423–440. doi:10.1111/jasp.1992.22.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewal R, Mehta R, Kardes FR. The timing of repeat purchases of consumer durable goods: the role of functional bases of consumer attitudes. J Marketing Res. 2004;41(1):101–115. doi:10.1509/jmkr.41.1.101.25090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt SE, Maio GR, Rees K, Hewstone M. Functions of attitudes towards ethnic groups: effects of level of abstraction. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2007;43(3):441–449. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X. Integrating the theory of planned behavior and attitude functions: implications for health campaign design. Health Commun. 2009;24(5):426. doi:10.1080/1041023090302347719657825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X. The role of attitude functions, efficacy, anticipated emotions, and relationship status on college students’ condom use intentions. J Sex Res. 2013;50(7):704. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.68741122946831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salloch S, Vollmann J, Schildmann J. Ethics by opinion poll? The functions of attitudes research for normative deliberations in medical ethics. J Med Ethics. 2014;40(9):597. doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-10125323632008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilal FG, Zhang J, Gilal NG, Gilal RG. Integrating self-determined needs into the relationship among product design, willingness-to-pay a premium, and word-of-mouth: a cross-cultural gender-specific study. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2018;11:227–241. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S16126929922102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilal FG, Zhang J, Gilal NG, Gilal RG. Association between a parent’s brand passion and a child’s brand passion: a moderated moderated-mediation model. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2018;11:91–102. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S16175529695938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaker JL, Benet-Martínez V, Garolera J. Consumption symbols as carriers of culture: a study of Japanese and spanish brand personality constructs. J Personality Social Psychol. 2001;81(3):492–508. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.3.492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilal NG, Zhang J, Gilal FG. Linking product design to consumer behavior: the moderating role of consumption experience. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2018;11:169–185. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S16138429785145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar