Morality is Supreme: The Roles of Morality, Fairness and Group Identity in the Ultimatum Paradigm

References

• Fehr E, Camerer CF. Social neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007;11(10):419–427. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rilling JK, Sanfey AG. The neuroscience of social decision-making. Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:23–48. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA, Zipay KP. Justice, fairness, and employee reactions. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2015;2:75–99. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111457
   Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Gächter S. Fairness and retaliation: the economics of reciprocity. J Econ Perspect. 2000;14(3):159–182. doi:10.1257/jep.14.3.159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Zhang F, Huang L, Yuan B, Wang Y. Theories and measurement methods of social value orientation related to decision making. Adv Psychol Sci. 2014;22(01):48–56. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00048
   Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Yang Z, Jin C, Qi Y, Liu X. The influence of emotion on fairness-related decision making: a critical review of theories and evidence. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1592. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güth W, Rolf S, Bernd S. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J Econ Behav Organ. 1982;3(4):367–388. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debove S, Baumard N, André J-B. Models of the evolution of fairness in the ultimatum game: a review and classification. Evol Hum Behav. 2016;37(3):245. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak MA, Page KM, Sigmund K. Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game. Science. 2000;289(5485):1773–1775. doi:10.1126/science.289.5485.1773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabin M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Am Econ Rev. 1993;83:1281–1302. doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4j8j.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, et al. In search of homo economicus: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Am Econ Rev. 2001;91(2):73–78. doi:10.1257/aer.91.2.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glimcher PW, Fehr E. Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain. 2nd ed. London: Academic; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Sanfey AG, Rilling JK, Aronson JA, Nystrom LE, Cohen JD. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science. 2003;300(5626):1755–1758. doi:10.1126/science.1082976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q J Econ. 1999;114(3):817–868. doi:10.2139/ssrn.106228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G, Li J, Li Z, Wei M, Li S. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: an ERP study. Brain Res. 2016;1639:38–46. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2016.02.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu P, Chi Y. A review on the social intuitionist model of moral judgment. Psychol Sci. 2007;30(2):403–405. doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2007.02.038
   Google Scholar
• Saltzstein HD. The relation between moral judgment and behavior: a social-cognitive and decision-making analysis. Hum Dev. 1994;37:299–312. doi:10.1159/000278274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapsley DK. Moral Psychology. Boulder CO: West- view Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Greene JD, Nystrom LE, Engell AD, Darley JM, Cohen JD. The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron. 2004;44(2):389–400. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu J, Peng X, Liao C, Cui F. The stereotype of professional roles influences neural responses to moral transgressions: ERP evidence. Biol Psychol. 2019;145:55–61. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambilla M, Leach CW. On the importance of being moral: the distinctive role of morality in social judgment. Soc Cogn. 2014;32(4):397–408. doi:10.1521/SOCO.2014.32.4.397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin GP, Piazza J, Rozin P. Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014;106(1):148–168. doi:10.1037/a0034726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser A, Gaertig C, Ruz M. Social information and personal interests modulate neural activity during economic decision-making. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:31. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado MR, Frank RH, Phelps EA. Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(11):1611–1618. doi:10.1038/nn1575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson B, Harrell A, Willer R. Hidden paths from morality to cooperation: moral judgments promote trust and trustworthiness. Soc Forces. 2013;91(4):1529–1548. doi:10.1093/sf/sot015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fumagalli M, Ferrucci R, Mameli F, et al. Gender-related differences in moral judgments. Cogn Process. 2010;11:219–226. doi:10.1007/s10339-009-0335-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef FF, Dookeeram K, Basdeo V, et al. Stress alters personal moral decision making. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012;37(4):491–498. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.07.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheele D, Striepens N, Kendrick KM, et al. Opposing effects of oxytocin on moral judgment in males and females. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35(12):6067–6076. doi:10.1002/hbm.22605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U. Gender differences in preferences. J Econ Lit. 2009;47:448–474. doi:10.1257/jel.47.2.448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei H, Ran Y. Male versus female: how the gender of apologizers influences consumer forgiveness. J Bus Ethics. 2019;154:371–387. doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3440-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cikara M, Van Bavel JJ. The neuroscience of intergroup relations: an integrative review. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014;9(3):245–274. doi:10.1177/1745691614527464
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner J. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Hogg MA, Abrams D, editors. Intergroup Relations: Essential Readings. Philadelphia: Psychology Press; 2001:94–109.
   Google Scholar
• McLeish KN, Oxoby RJ. Social interactions and the salience of social identity. J Econ Psychol. 2011;32(1):172–178. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2010.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuliffe K, Dunham Y. Group bias in cooperative norm enforcement. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016;371(1686):20150073. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zhang Z, Zhang W, Huang L, Guo F, Yuan S. Group membership modulates the recipient’s fairness consideration in ultimatum game. Xin Li Xue Bao. 2014;46(12):1850–1859. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.01850
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zhang Z, Bai L, Lin C, Osinsky R, Hewig J. Ingroup/outgroup membership modulates fairness consideration: neural signatures from ERPs and EEG oscillations. Sci Rep. 2017;7:39827. doi:10.1038/srep39827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biella M, Sacchi S. Not fair but acceptable … for us! Group membership influences the trade-off between equality and utility in a third-party ultimatum game. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2018;77:117–131. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuliffe K, Dunham Y. Fairness overrides group bias in children’s second-party punishment. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017;146(4):485–494. doi:10.1037/xge0000244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Gao X. Preschoolers’ group bias in punishing selfishness in the ultimatum game. J Exp Child Psychol. 2018;166:280–292. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.08.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan JJ, McAuliffe K, Warneken F. Development of in-group favoritism in children’s third-party punishment of selfishness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(35):12710–12715. doi:10.1073/pnas.1402280111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewstone M, Rubin M, Willis H. Intergroup bias. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:575–604. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brüne M, Tas C, Wischniewski J, Welpinghus A, Heinisch C, Newen A. Hypnotic ingroup-outgroup suggestion influences economic decision-making in an ultimatum game. Conscious Cogn. 2012;21(2):939–946. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balliet D, Wu J, De Dreu CK. Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2014;140(6):1556–1581. doi:10.1037/a0037737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Zheng J, Meng L, Lu Q, Ma Q. Ingroup favoritism or the black sheep effect: perceived intentions modulate subjective responses to aggressive interactions. Neurosci Res (N Y). 2016;(2016(108):46–54. doi:10.1016/j.neures.2016.01.011
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Qi C, Wang Y, Zhao H, Wang X, Gao X. In-group favoritism or the black sheep effect? Group bias of fairness norm enforcement during economic games. Adv Psychol Sci. 2020;28(2):329–339. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00329
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza SA, Lane SP, Amodio DM. For members only: ingroup punishment of fairness norm violations in the ultimatum game. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2014;5(6):662–670. doi:10.1177/1948550614527115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewig J, Kretschmer N, Trippe RH, et al. Why humans deviate from rational choice. Psychophysiology. 2011;48(4):507–514. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01081.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Li S. Group identity and social preferences. Am Econ Rev. 2009;99(1):431–457. doi:10.1257/aer.99.1.431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv S, Sun X, Shen L, et al. Effect of group membership on unfairness perception under coexperience conditions. Xin Li Xue Bao. 2021;53(7):773–787. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00773
   Google Scholar
• van Nunspeet F, Ellemers N, Derks B, Nieuwenhuis S. Moral concerns increase attention and response monitoring during IAT performance: ERP evidence. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014;9(2):141–149. doi:10.1093/scan/nss118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan B, Du B, Chen S, Li Y, He W, Luo W. Moral judgment modulates fairness consideration in the early outcome evaluation stage. Chin Sci Bull. 2021;65:1985–1995. doi:10.1360/TB-2019-0681
   Google Scholar
• Haidt J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol Rev. 2001;108(4):814–834. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene J, Haidt J. How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends Cogn Sci. 2002;6(12):517–523. doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)02011-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horberg EJ, Oveis C, Keltner D, Cohen AB. Disgust and the moralization of purity. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009;97(6):963–976. doi:10.1037/a0017423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSteno D, Bartlett MY, Baumann J, Williams LA, Dickens L. Gratitude as moral sentiment: emotion-guided cooperation in economic exchange. Emotion. 2010;10(2):289–293. doi:10.1037/a0017883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonini N, Hadjichristidis C, Mazzocco K, et al. Pecunia olet: the role of incidental disgust in the ultimatum game. Emotion. 2011;11(4):965–969. doi:10.1037/a0022820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Wang Y, Lin C, Chen X, Yuan B, Shen D. Modulation of conscientiousness on medial frontal negativity in negative emotions. An ERP study on ultimatum game. Scientia Sinica Vitae. 2011;41(4):320–331. doi:10.1360/052010-647
   Google Scholar
• Moretti L, Di Pellegrino G. Disgust selectively modulates reciprocal fairness in economic interactions. Emotion. 2010;10(2):169–180. doi:10.1037/a0017826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu C, Météreau E, Butera L, Villeval MC, Dreher JC. Neurocomputational mechanisms at play when weighing concerns for extrinsic rewards, moral values, and social image. PLoS Biol. 2019;17(6):e3000283. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crockett MJ, Siegel JZ, Kurth-Nelson Z, Dayan P, Dolan RJ. Moral transgressions corrupt neural representations of value. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20(6):879–885. doi:10.1038/nn.4557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer M, Fischbacher U, Herrnberger B, Grön G, Fehr E. The neural signature of social norm compliance. Neuron. 2007;56(1):185–196. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winterich KP, Mittal V, Ross WT. Donation behavior toward in-groups and out-groups: the role of gender and moral identity. J Consum Res. 2009;36(2):199–214. doi:10.1086/596720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizarro D, Inbar Y, Helion C. On disgust and moral judgment. Emot Rev. 2011;3(3):267–268. doi:10.1177/1754073911402394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar