A Study on Paradoxical Leadership and Multiple Path Mechanisms of Employees’ Bootleg Innovation

References

• Augsdorfer P. Forbidden fruit: an analysis of bootlegging, uncertainty, and learning in corporate R&D. Aldershot. 1996;1996:19.
   Google Scholar
• Criscuolo P, Salter A, Ter Wal ALJ. Going underground: bootlegging and individual innovative performance. Organ Sci. 2014;25(5):1287–1305. doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augsdorfer P. Bootlegging and path dependency. Res Policy. 2005;34(1):1–11. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Globocnik D, Haufler BP, Salomo S. Organizational antecedents to bootlegging and consequences for the newness of the innovation portfolio. J Prod Innov Manag. 2022;39(5):717–745. doi:10.1111/jpim.12626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang HY, Cui ZS, Yu JL, Zhao D, Zhao D. Loyal or rebel? Employee bootleg innovation in Chinese context. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2019;27(6):975–989. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.00975
   Google Scholar
• Zhang LY, Li XC, Liu ZQ. Fostering constructive deviance by leader moral humility: the mediating role of employee moral identity and moderating role of normative conflict. J Bus Ethics. 2022;180(2):731–746. doi:10.1007/s10551-021-04909-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui ZS, Wang HY, Nanyangwe CN. How does coaching leadership promote employee’s constructive deviance? Affective events perspective. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2022;43(2):279–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu SJ, Du MZ. The influence of authentic leadership on employees’ constructive deviance: a chain mediating model. Soft Sci. 2021;35(3):101–107.
   Google Scholar
• Rosing K, Frese M, Bausch A. Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: ambidextrous leadership. Leadersh Q. 2011;22(5):956–974. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farjoun M. Beyond dualism: stability and change as a duality. Acad Manage Rev. 2010;35(2):202–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slawinski N, Bansal P. Short on time: intertemporal tensions in business sustainability. Organ Sci. 2015;26(2):531–549. doi:10.1287/orsc.2014.0960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton RK. Social theory and social structure. Q Rev Biol. 1968;34(4):53–55.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M. Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad Manag J. 1996;39(5):1154–1184. doi:10.2307/256995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Waldman DA, Han YL, Li XB. Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: antecedents and consequences. Acad Manag J. 2015;58(2):538–566. doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Li YZ, Zhu DQ, Li JZ. “Lubricant” or “stumbling block”? The paradoxical association between team authoritarian leadership and creative deviance. Front Psychol. 2022;13:835970. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.835970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu J, Zhang LR, Wu MY, Imran M, He Q, Zhao Y. Influence of differential leadership behavior on employees’ deviant innovation: based on dual perspectives of insider and outsider subordinates. Front Psychol. 2022;13:945598. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.945598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Globocnik D. Taking or avoiding risk through secret innovation activities-the relationships among employees’ risk propensity, bootlegging, and management support. Int J Innov Manag. 2019;23(3):1–41. doi:10.1142/S1363919619500221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li MZ, Ye HL. Temporal leadership and bootlegging behavior of employees: the mediating effect of self-efficacy. Front Psychol. 2021;12:633261. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen JJP, Kostopoulos KC, Mihalache OR, Papalexandris A. A socio-psychological perspective on team ambidexterity: the contingency role of supportive leadership behaviours. J Manag Stud. 2016;53(6):939–965. doi:10.1111/joms.12183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbrook RA, Oliver RL. The dimensionality of consumption emotion patterns and consumer satisfaction. J Consum Res. 1991;18(1):84–91. doi:10.1086/209243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porath C, Spreitzer G, Gibson C, Stevens F. Thriving at work: toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. J Organ Behav. 2012;33(2):250–275. doi:10.1002/job.756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad Manag J. 2004;47(2):209–226. doi:10.2307/20159573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis MW, Andriopoulos C, Smith WK. Paradoxical leadership to enable strategic agility. Calif Manage Rev. 2014;56(3):58–77. doi:10.1525/cmr.2014.56.3.58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauppila OP, Tempelaar MP. The social-cognitive underpinnings of employees’ ambidextrous behaviour and the supportive role of group managers’ leadership. J Manag Stud. 2016;53(6):1019–1044. doi:10.1111/joms.12192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umphress EE, Bingham JB. When employees do bad things for good reasons: examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organ Sci. 2011;22(3):621–640. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainemelis C. Stealing fire: creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas. Acad Manage Rev. 2010;35(4):558–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ron H, Dina S, Louis S. Education and capital development: capital as durable personal, social, economic and political influences on the happiness of individuals. Education. 2003;123(3):496–513.
   Google Scholar
• Cole K, Daly A, Mak A. Good for the soul: the relationship between work, well-being and psychological capital. Int J Soc Econ. 2008;38(3):464–474. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2008.10.004
   Google Scholar
• Seligman MEP, Csikszentmihalyi M. “Positive psychology: an introduction”: reply. Am Psychol. 2001;56(1):89–90. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.1.89
   Google Scholar
• Luthans F, Youssef CM. Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: investing in people for competitive advantage. Organ Dyn. 2004;33(2):143–160. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2004.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio BJ, Luthans F. The High Impact Leader: Moments Matter in Accelerating Authentic Leadership Development. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Luthans F, Avolio BJ, Avey JB, Norman SM. Positive psychological capital: measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Pers Psychol. 2007;60(3):541–572. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu SS. The stabilities influencing factors and solutions of the local universities’ young teachers in the underdeveloped areas: oriented on the new capital view. J Gannan nor Univ. 2016;37(3):110–112.
   Google Scholar
• Spreitzer G, Sutcliffe K, Dutton J, Sonenshein S, Grant A. A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organ Sci. 2005;16(5):537–549. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porath CL, Erez A. Does rudeness really matter? The effects of rudeness on task performance and helpfulness. Acad Manag J. 2007;50(5):1181–1197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porath C, Gibson C, Spreitzer G. Antecedents and consequences of thriving at work: a study of six organizations. Academy of Management Meetings, Anaheim, CA; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Bommer WH, Podsakoff NP, MacKenzie SB. Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and subordinate attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors: a meta-analytic review of existing and new research. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2006;99(2):113–142. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin BL, Mainemelis C, Kark R. Leaders’ responses to creative deviance: differential effects on subsequent creative deviance and creative performance. Leadersh Q. 2016;27(4):537–556. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia JF, Liu Z, Zheng YY. How does paradoxical leadership promote bootlegging: ATPB-based multiple mediation model. Chin Manag Stud. 2021;15(4):919–939. doi:10.1108/CMS-09-2020-0418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nembhard IM, Edmondson AC. Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J Organ Behav. 2006;27(7):941–966. doi:10.1002/job.413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong SY, Chung JY. The influence of hotel culinary staff’s positive psychological capital in intrinsic motivation and innovative behaviour of the deluxe hotels in Seoul. Korean J Tour Res. 2017;32(2):335–351.
   Google Scholar
• Lutanans F, Youssef CM. Emerging positive organizational behavior. J Manage. 2007;33(33):321–349. doi:10.1177/0149206307300814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rego A, Sousa F, Marques C, Cunha MPE. Retail employees’ self-efficacy and hope predicting their positive affect and creativity. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2012;21(6):923–945. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2011.610891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rego A, Sousa F, Marques C, Cunha MPE. Authentic leadership promoting employees’ psychological capital and creativity. J Bus Res. 2012;65(3):429–437. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson TA, Luthans F, Jeung W. Thriving at work: impact of psychological capital and supervisor support. J Organ Behav. 2014;35(3):434–446. doi:10.1002/job.1907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq. 2000;11(4):227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch R, Leitner KH. The dynamics and functions of self-organization in the fuzzy front end: empirical evidence from the Austrian semiconductor industry. Creat Innov Manag. 2008;17(3):216–226. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2008.00488.x
   Google Scholar
• Carmeli A, Spreitzer GM. Trust, connectivity, and thriving: implications for innovative behaviors at work. J Creat Behav. 2009;43(3):169–191. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01313.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kark R, Carmeli A. Alive and creating: the mediating role of vitality and aliveness in the relationship between psychological safety and creative work Involvement. J Organ Behav. 2009;30(6):785–804. doi:10.1002/job.571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson BL. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am Psychol. 2001;59(3):218–226. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile TM. How to kill creativity. Harv Bus Rev. 1998;76(5):76–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonge JD, Spoor E, Sonnentag S, Dormann C, van den Tooren M. “Take a break?!” Off-job recovery, job demands, and job resources as predictors of health, active learning, and creativity. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2011;21(3):321–348. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2011.576009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatereh G, Aldijana B, Guido B, Ceren M. Efficaciously smuggling ideas: untangling the relationship between entrepreneurial self-efficacy, creative bootlegging and embedded lead users. Int J Innov Manag. 2021;25(3):2150032. doi:10.1142/S1363919621500328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Globocnik D, Salomo S. Do formal management practices impact the emergence of bootlegging behavior? J Prod Innov Manag. 2015;32(4):505–521. doi:10.1111/jpim.12215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischel W, Shoda Y. A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychol Rev. 1995;102(2):246–268. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Makbule KS, Berke K. Undergraduates’ achievement goal orientations academic self efficacy and hope as the predictors of their learning approaches. Eur J Educ Res. 2019;8(1):99–106. doi:10.12973/eu-jer.8.1.99
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Organ DW. Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manage. 1986;12(4):531–544. doi:10.1177/014920638601200408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulland J, Baumgartner H, Smith KM. Marketing survey research best practices: evidence and recommendations from a review of JAMS articles. J Acad Mark Sci. 2018;46(1):92–108. doi:10.1007/s11747-017-0532-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Besharov ML, Wessels AK, Chertok M. A paradoxical leadership model for social entrepreneurs: challenges, leadership skills, and pedagogical tools for managing social and commercial demands. Acad Manag Learn Educ. 2012;11(3):463–478. doi:10.5465/amle.2011.0021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruch H, Ghoshal S. Unleashing organizational energy. MIT Sloan Manag Rev. 2003;45(1):45–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang MM, Zhang J, He J, Bi YZ, Wang Q. Paradoxical leadership and employee innovation: organization-based self-esteem and harmonious passion as sequential mediators. Soc Behav Pers. 2022;50(7):1–10. doi:10.2224/sbp.11757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia JF, Yan JQ, Liu YP, Liu Y. Paradoxical leadership incongruence and Chinese individuals’ followership behaviors: moderation effects of hierarchical culture and perceived strength of human resource management system. Asian Bus Manag. 2018;17(5):313–338. doi:10.1057/s41291-018-0043-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XY, Xue Y, Liang H, Yan D. The impact of paradoxical leadership on employee voice behavior: a moderated mediation model. Front Psychol. 2020;11:537756. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.537756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Lewis MW. Toward a theory of paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad Manage Rev. 2011;36(2):381–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schad J, Lewis MW, Raisch S, Smith WK. Paradox research in management science: looking back to move forward. Acad Manag Ann. 2016;10(1):5–64. doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1162422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li SW, Jia RQ, Seufert JH, Tang HJ, Luo JL. As the tree is, so is the fruit? Examining the effects of ethical leadership on bootlegging from the perspective of leader-follower gender similarity. Gend Manag. 2021;36(7):785–800. doi:10.1108/GM-06-2020-0180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu JJ, Xiong L, Zhang MY, Chen C. The mobilization of employees’ psychological resources: how servant leadership motivates pro-customer deviance. Int J Contemp Hosp. 2022. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-02-2022-0198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar