Does AI-Driven Technostress Promote or Hinder Employees’ Artificial Intelligence Adoption Intention? A Moderated Mediation Model of Affective Reactions and Technical Self-Efficacy

References

• Haenlein M, Kaplan A. A brief history of artificial intelligence: on the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. Calif Manage Rev. 2019;61(4):5–14. doi:10.1177/0008125619864925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan Y, Edwards JS, Dwivedi YK. Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of big data – evolution, challenges and research agenda. Int J Inf Manag. 2019;48:63–71. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paschen J, Wilson M, Ferreira JJ. Collaborative intelligence: how human and artificial intelligence create value along the B2B sales funnel. Bus Horiz. 2020;63(3):403–414. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2020.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belanche D, Casaló LV, Flavián C. Artificial Intelligence in FinTech: understanding robo-advisors adoption among customers. Ind Manag Data Syst. 2019;119(7):1411–1430. doi:10.1108/IMDS-08-2018-0368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joehnk J, Weissert M, Wyrtki K. Ready or not, AI comes- An interview study of organizational AI readiness factors. Bus Inf Syst Eng. 2021;63(1):5–20. doi:10.1007/s12599-020-00676-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam K, Dutt CS, Chathoth P, Daghfous A, Khan MS. The adoption of artificial intelligence and robotics in the hotel industry: prospects and challenges. Electron Mark. 2021;31(3):553–574. doi:10.1007/s12525-020-00442-3
   Google Scholar
• Mingotto E, Montaguti F, Tamma M. Challenges in re-designing operations and jobs to embody AI and robotics in services. Findings from a case in the hospitality industry. Electron Mark. 2021;31(3):493–510. doi:10.1007/s12525-020-00439-y
   Google Scholar
• Lakshmi V, Bahli B. Understanding the robotization landscape transformation: a centering resonance analysis. J Innov Knowl. 2020;5(1):59–67. doi:10.1016/j.jik.2019.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braganza A, Chen W, Canhoto A, Sap S. Productive employment and decent work: the impact of AI adoption on psychological contracts, job engagement and employee trust. J Bus Res. 2021;131:485–494. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng B, Lin H, Kong Y. Challenge or hindrance? How and when organizational artificial intelligence adoption influences employee job crafting. J Bus Res. 2023;164:113987. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113987
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh B, Daugherty PR, Wilson HJ, Burden A. Taking a systems approach to adopting AI. Harv Bus Rev. 2019;2019:1.
   Google Scholar
• Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319–340. doi:10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tornatzky LG, Fleischer M, Chakrabarti AK. The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425–478. doi:10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan Y, Froese F, Liu N, Hu Y, Ye M. The adoption of artificial intelligence in employee recruitment: the influence of contextual factors. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2022;33(6):1125–1147. doi:10.1080/09585192.2021.1879206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn K, Kwon O. Technology acceptance theories and factors influencing artificial Intelligence-based intelligent products. Telemat Inform. 2020;47:101324. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2019.101324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavián C, Pérez-Rueda A, Belanche D, Casaló LV. Intention to use analytical artificial intelligence (AI) in services–the effect of technology readiness and awareness. J Serv Manag. 2022;33(2):293–320. doi:10.1108/JOSM-10-2020-0378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M, Wu J, Zhu C, Hu K. Factors influencing the acceptance of robo-taxi services in China: an extended technology acceptance model analysis. J Adv Transp. 2022;2022:8461212. doi:10.1155/2022/8461212
   Google Scholar
• Moussawi S, Koufaris M, Benbunan-Fich R. How perceptions of intelligence and anthropomorphism affect adoption of personal intelligent agents. Electron Mark. 2021;31(2):343–364. doi:10.1007/s12525-020-00411-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Li R, Gan M, Fu Z, Yuan F. Public acceptance of driverless buses in China: an empirical analysis based on an extended UTAUT model. Discrete Dyn Nat Soc. 2020;2020:4318182. doi:10.1155/2020/4318182
   Google Scholar
• Cao D, Sun Y, Goh E, Wang R, Kuiavska K. Adoption of smart voice assistants technology among Airbnb guests: a revised self-efficacy-based value adoption model (SVAM). Int J Hosp Manag. 2022;101:103124. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yam KC, Tang PM, Jackson JC, Su R, Gray K. The rise of robots increases job insecurity and maladaptive workplace behaviors: multimethod evidence. J Appl Psychol. 2023;108(5):850–870. doi:10.1037/apl0001045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YY, Wang YS. Development and validation of an artificial intelligence anxiety scale: an initial application in predicting motivated learning behavior. Interact Learn Environ. 2022;30(4):619–634. doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1674887
   Google Scholar
• Tarafdar M, Pullins E, Ragu-Nathan TS. Technostress: negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Inf Syst J. 2015;25(2):103–132. doi:10.1111/isj.12042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleem F, Malik MI, Qureshi SS, Farid MF, Qamar S. Technostress and employee performance nexus during COVID-19: training and creative self-efficacy as moderators. Front Psychol. 2021;12:595119. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.595119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salanova M, Llorens S, Cifre E. The dark side of technologies: technostress among users of information and communication technologies. Int J Psychol. 2013;48(3):422–436. doi:10.1080/00207594.2012.680460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Muthitacharoen A. An empirical investigation of the consequences of technostress: evidence from China. Inf Resour Manag J. 2016;29(2):14–36. doi:10.4018/IRMJ.2016040102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng W, Tu R, Lu T, Zhou Z. Understanding forced adoption of self-service technology: the impacts of users’ psychological reactance. Behav Inf Technol. 2019;38(8):820–832. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2018.1557745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh MA, Boswell WR, Roehling MV, Boudreau JW. An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers. J Appl Psychol. 2000;85(1):65–74. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LePine MA. The challenge-hindrance stressor framework: an integrative conceptual review and path forward. Group Organ Manag. 2022;47(2):223–254. doi:10.1177/10596011221079970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benlian A. A daily field investigation of technology-driven spillovers from work to home. MIS Q. 2020;44(3):1259–1300. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2020/14911/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu X, Xu S, Ashton M. Antecedents and outcomes of artificial intelligence adoption and application in the workplace: the socio-technical system theory perspective. Inf Technol People. 2023;36(1):454–474. doi:10.1108/ITP-04-2021-0254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman A, Colby CL. An updated and streamlined technology readiness index: TRI 2.0. J Serv Res. 2015;18(1):59–74. doi:10.1177/1094670514539730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agogo D, Hess TJ. “How does tech make you feel?” a review and examination of negative affective responses to technology use. Eur J Inf Syst. 2018;27(5):570–599. doi:10.1080/0960085X.2018.1435230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS. Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. Am Psychol. 1991;46(8):819–834. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.46.8.819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, He B, Sun X. Does work stressors lead to abusive supervision? A study of differentiated effects of challenge and hindrance stressors. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020;13:573–588. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S249071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodell JB, Judge TA. Can “good” stressors spark “bad” behaviors? The mediating role of emotions in links of challenge and hindrance stressors with citizenship and counterproductive behaviors. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(6):1438–1451. doi:10.1037/a0016752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarafdar M, Bolman Pullins E, Ragu-Nathan TS. Examining impacts of technostress on the professional salesperson’s behavioural performance. J Pers Sell Sales Manag. 2014;34(1):51–69. doi:10.1080/08853134.2013.870184
   Google Scholar
• Compeau DR, Higgins CA. Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Q. 1995;19(2):189–211. doi:10.2307/249688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss HM, Cropanzano R. Affective events theory: a theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL, editors. Research in Organizational Behavior. Jai Press Inc; 1996:1–74. https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/summary/b7b37b1a-ffb0-4c3e-a2ff-001699cc6b82-bd627a16/relevance/1. Accessed January 23, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Maier C, Laumer S, Tarafdar M, et al. Challenge and hindrance IS use stressors and appraisals: explaining contrarian associations in post-acceptance IS use behavior. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2021;22(6):1590–1624. doi:10.17705/1jais.00709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood SJ, Michaelides G. Challenge and hindrance stressors and wellbeing-based work–nonwork interference: a diary study of portfolio workers. Hum Relat. 2016;69(1):111–138. doi:10.1177/0018726715580866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LePine MA, Zhang Y, Crawford ER, Rich BL. Turning their pain to gain: charismatic leader influence on follower stress appraisal and job performance. Acad Manage J. 2016;59(3):1036–1059. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson DG, Verdicchio M. AI anxiety. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2017;68(9):2267–2270. doi:10.1002/asi.23867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgieff A, Hyee R. Artificial intelligence and employment: new cross-country evidence. Front Artif Intell. 2022;5. doi:10.3389/frai.2022.832736
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Huang JS. Dimensions of artificial intelligence anxiety based on the integrated fear acquisition theory. Technol Soc. 2020;63:101410. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondanini G, Giorgi G, Ariza-Montes A, Vega-Muñoz A, Andreucci-Annunziata P. Technostress dark side of technology in the workplace: a scientometric analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(21):8013. doi:10.3390/ijerph17218013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahu AK, Padhy RK, Dhir A. Envisioning the future of behavioral decision-making: a systematic literature review of behavioral reasoning theory. Australas Mark J. 2020;28(4):145–159. doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gkinko L, Elbanna A. Hope, tolerance and empathy: employees’ emotions when using an AI-enabled chatbot in a digitalised workplace. Inf Technol People. 2022;35(6):1714–1743. doi:10.1108/ITP-04-2021-0328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam KR, Stanton JM. Events, emotions, and technology: examining acceptance of workplace technology changes. Inf Technol People. 2010;23(1):23–53. doi:10.1108/09593841011022537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu YT, Zhu YQ, Corbett J. In the hearts and minds of employees: a model of pre-adoptive appraisal toward artificial intelligence in organizations. Int J Inf Manag. 2021;60:102379. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gursoy D, Chi OH, Lu L, Nunkoo R. Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery. Int J Inf Manag. 2019;49:157–169. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding Y. Modelling continued use of information systems from a forward-looking perspective: antecedents and consequences of hope and anticipated regret. Inf Manage. 2018;55(4):461–471. doi:10.1016/j.im.2017.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Bhattacharjee KK. Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: a quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling. Educ Inf Technol. 2020;25(5):3443–3463. doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10159-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson BL. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am Psychol. 2001;56(3):218–226. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang MH, Rust RT. Artificial Intelligence in Service. J Serv Res. 2018;21(2):155–172. doi:10.1177/1094670517752459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evanschitzky H, Iyer GR, Pillai KG, Kenning P, Schuete R. Consumer trial, continuous use, and economic benefits of a retail service innovation: the case of the personal shopping assistant. J Prod Innov Manag. 2015;32(3):459–475. doi:10.1111/jpim.12241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya F, Aydin F, Schepman A, Rodway P, Yetisensoy O, Kaya MD. The roles of personality traits, AI anxiety, and demographic factors in attitudes toward artificial intelligence. Int J Hum-Comput Interact. 2022. doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2151730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horan KA, Nakahara WH, DiStaso MJ, Jex SM. A review of the challenge-hindrance stress model: recent advances, expanded paradigms, and recommendations for future research. Front Psychol. 2020;11:560346. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.560346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Li X. The impact of challenge and hindrance stressors on thriving at work double mediation based on affect and motivation. Front Psychol. 2021;12:613871. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.613871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang MH, Rust RT. A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing. J Acad Marking Sci. 2021;49(1):30–50. doi:10.1007/s11747-020-00749-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure PK. “You’re Fired”, says the robot: the rise of automation in the workplace, technophobes, and fears of unemployment. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2018;36(2):139–156. doi:10.1177/0894439317698637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brougham D, Haar J. Smart technology, artificial intelligence, robotics, and algorithms (STARA): employees’ perceptions of our future workplace. J Manag Organ. 2018;24(2):239–257. doi:10.1017/jmo.2016.55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol. 1982;37(2):122–147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DG, Lee CW. Exploring the roles of self-efficacy and technical support in the relationship between techno-stress and counter-productivity. Sustainability. 2021;13(8):4349. doi:10.3390/su13084349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun LY, Aryee S, Law KS. High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: a relational perspective. Acad Manage J. 2007;50(3):558–577. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.25525821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin RW. Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. Methodology. 1980;1980:389–444.
   Google Scholar
• Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54(6):1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turja T, Rantanen T, Oksanen A. Robot use self-efficacy in healthcare work (RUSH): development and validation of a new measure. AI Soc. 2019;34(1):137–143. doi:10.1007/s00146-017-0751-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karahanna E, Straub D, Chervany N. Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Q Manag Inf Syst. 1999;23(2):183–213. doi:10.2307/249751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi M, Choi H. What drives the acceptance of AI technology?: the role of expectations and experiences. arXiv preprint arXiv. 2023;16:1. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2306.13670
   Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kyndt E, Onghena P. The Integration of Work and Learning: tackling the Complexity with Structural Equation Modelling. In: Harteis C, Rausch A, Seifried J editors. Discourses on Professional Learning. Professional and Practice-based Learning. Springer Netherlands; 2014:255–291. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7012-6_14
   Google Scholar
• Li JJ, Bonn MA, Ye BH. Hotel employee’s artificial intelligence and robotics awareness and its impact on turnover intention: the moderating roles of perceived organizational support and competitive psychological climate. Tour Manag. 2019;73:172–181. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2019.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke AB, Goodman JM, Treadway DC, Breland JW. Perceived organizational support as a moderator of emotional labor/outcomes relationships. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2009;39(5):1013–1034. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00470.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury S, Dey P, Joel-Edgar S, et al. Unlocking the value of artificial intelligence in human resource management through AI capability framework. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2023;33(1):100899. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nastjuk I, Trang S, Grummeck-Braamt JV, Adam MTP, Tarafdar M. Integrating and synthesising technostress research: a meta-analysis on technostress creators, outcomes, and IS usage contexts. Eur J Inf Syst. 2023;1–22. doi:10.1080/0960085X.2022.2154712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei W, Li L. The impact of artificial intelligence on the mental health of manufacturing workers: the mediating role of overtime work and the work environment. Front Public Health. 2022;10:862407. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.862407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné M, Parent-Rocheleau X, Bujold A, Gaudet MC, Lirio P. How algorithmic management influences worker motivation: a Self-Determination Theory perspective. Can Psychol. 2022;63(2):247–260. doi:10.1037/cap0000324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang PC, Guo Y, Cai Q, Guo H. Proactive career orientation and subjective career success: a perspective of career construction theory. Behav Sci. 2023;13(6):503. doi:10.3390/bs13060503
   PubMedGoogle Scholar