Data Modeling for Preservice Teachers and Everyone Else

References

• Anderson, R. D., & Mitchener, C. P (1994). Research on science teacher education. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 3-44). New York, NY: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, J., & Hodson, D. (2001). Pedagogical context knowledge: Toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Education, 85, 426-453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, E. (2010). Thinking outside the kit: Building preservice science teachers’ inquiry skills with an experiment that doesn’t go as planned. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(1), 54-57.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of research in education, 32, 268-291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., & Bismack, A. S. (2016). Reconceptualizing STEM education: The central role of practices. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fones, S. W., Wagner, J. R., & Caldwell, E. R. (1999). Promoting attitude adjustments in science for preservice elementary teachers. Journal of College Science Teaching, 28(4), 231-236.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes, S. Q., Bloom, M. A., & Peace, H. (2014). Teaching science and mathematics: Preservice teachers’ perceptions of knowledge needs. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(3), 30-35.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, C., Finkelstein, N., & Beach, A. (2010). Beyond dissemination in college science teaching: An introduction to four core change strategies. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39(5), 18-25.
   Google Scholar
• Howitt, C. (2007). Preservice elementary teachers’ perceptions of factors in an holistic methods course influencing their confidence in teaching science. Research in Science Education, 37, 41-58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. L. (2016). Quantitative reasoning in mathematics education: Directions in research and practice. In R. A. Duschl & A. Bismack (Eds.), Reconceptualizing STEM education: The central role of practices (pp. 149-166). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2004). Modeling natural variation through distribution. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 635-679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2015). The development of scientific thinking. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 1-44). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., Strom, D., & Pligge, M. (2001). Similarity of form and substance: Modeling material kind. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 39-74). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, D. (2015). Investigating preservice teachers’ self-efficacy through Saturday science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 45(1), 77-83.
   Google Scholar
• Mulholland, M. J., & Wallace, J. (1994). Knowing and learning about science in a preservice setting: A narrative study. Research in Science Education, 24, 236-245.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states (Appendix F: Science and engineering practices in the NGSS). Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., & Fishman, B. J. (2012). Large-scale science education intervention research we can use. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 281-304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrosino, A. J. (2016). Teachers’ use of data measurement and data modeling in quantitative reasoning. In R. A. Duschl, & A. Bismack (Eds.), Reconceptualizing STEM education: The central role of practices (pp. 167-180). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petrosino, A. J., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Structuring error and experimental variation as distribution in the fourth grade. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2-3), 131-156.
   Google Scholar
• Riegle-Crumb, C., Morton, K., Moore, C., Chimonidou, A., Labrake, C., & Kopp, S. (2015). Do inquiring minds have positive attitudes? The science education of preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 99, 819-836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vail Lowery, N. (2002). Construction of teacher knowledge in context: Preparing elementary teachers to teach mathematics and science. School Science and Mathematics, 102, 68-83.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, A. R. (2016). Modeling authentic STEM research: A systems thinking perspective. In R. A. Duschl & A. Bismack (Eds.), Reconceptualizing STEM education: The central role of practices (pp. 101-114). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92, 941-967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar