References
- Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D., & Airasian, P (2000). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Abridged 2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
- Aydeniz, M., Pabuccu, A., Cetin, P S., & Kaya, E. (2012). Argumentation and students’ conceptual understanding of properties and behaviors of gases. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 1303-1324.
- Birol, G., Han, A., Welsh, A., & Fox, J. (2013). Impact of a first-year seminar in science on student writing and argumentation. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(1), 82-91.
- Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York, NY: McKay.
- Kelly, G., Regev, J., & Prothero, W (2007). Analysis of lines of reasoning in written argumentation. In S. Erduran & M. P Jimenez Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 137-157). New York, NY: Springer.
- Kulatunga, U., Moog, R., & Lewis, J. (2013). Argumentation and participation patterns in general chemistry peer-led sessions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 1207-1231.
- Kulatunga, U., Moog, R., & Lewis, J. (2014). Use of Toulmin’s argumentation scheme for student discourse to gain insight about guided inquiry activities in college chemistry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(5), 78-86.
- Lord, T., & Baviskar, S. (2007). Moving students from information recitation to information understanding: Exploiting Bloom’s taxonomy in creating science questions. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(5), 40-44.
- Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, A. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 994-1020.
- Timmerman, B., Strickland, D., Johnson, R., & Payne, J. (2010). Development of a ‘universal’ rubric for assessing undergraduates’ scientific reasoning skills using scientific writing. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36, 509-547.
- Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Walker, J., Sampson, V., Grooms, J., Anderson, B., & Zimmerman, C. (2012). Argument-driven inquiry in undergraduate chemistry labs: The impact on students’ conceptual understanding, argument skills, and attitudes toward science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(4), 74-81.
- Wilson, C., Taylor, J., Kowalsji, S., & Carlson, J. (2010). The relative effects and equity of inquiry-based and commonplace science teaching on students’ knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 276-301.