References
- Aikenhead, G. S. (1979). Science: A way of knowing. The Science Teacher, 46(6), 23-25.
- Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95, 918-942.
- Brewer, C. A., & Smith, D. (Eds.). (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A call to action. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Available at http://visionandchange.org/files/2011/03/Revised-Vision-and-Change-Final-Report.pdf
- Brownell, S. E., & Kloser, M. J. (2015). Toward a conceptual framework for measuring the effectiveness of course-based undergraduate research experiences in undergraduate biology. Studies in Higher Education, 40, 525-544.
- Brownell, S. E., Wenderoth, M. P., Theobald, R., Nnadozie, O., Koval, M., Freeman, S., … Crowe, A. J. (2014). How students think about experimental design: Novel conceptions revealed by in-class activities. Bioscience, 64, 125-137.
- Hoskins, S., Stevens, L., & Nehm, R. (2007). Selective use of primary literature transforms the classroom into a virtual laboratory. Genetics, 176, 1381-1389.
- Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331-359.
- Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of sciei and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Educatio in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1, 138-147.
- Linn, M. C., Palmer, E., Baranger, A., Gerard, E., & Stone, E. (2015). Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities. Science, 347, 1261757-1261751.
- Middlemis Maher, J., Markey, J. C., & Ebert-May, D. (2013). The othe half of the story: Effect size analy in quantitative research. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12, 345-351.
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Available at www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards
- Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalik, F. (2012). A series of misrepresentations: A response to Allchin’s whole approach to assessing nature of a science understandings. Science Education, 96, 685-692.
- Seung, E., Bryan, L. A., & Butler, M. B. (2009). Improving preservice middle grades science teachers’ understanding of the nature of science using three instructional approaches. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 157-177.
- Thanukos, A., Scotchmoor, J. G., Caldwell, R., & Lindberg, D. R. (2010). Science 101: Building the foundations for real understanding. Science, 330, 1764-1765.
- Understanding Science. (2016a). Asteroids and dinosaurs: Unexpected twists and an unfinished story. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Museum of Paleontology. Retrieved from http://www.understandingscience.org/article/alvarez_01
- Understanding Science. (2016b). How science works flowchart. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Museum of Paleontology. Retrieved from http://www.understandingscience.org
- Wilson, K. J., & Rigakos, B. (2016). Scientific process flowchart assessment (SPFA): A method for evaluating changes in understanding and visualization of the scientific process in a multidisciplinary student population. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15, ar63.
- Working Group on Teaching Evolution. (1998). Activity 1: Introducing inquiry and the nature of science. In D. Kennedy, B. Alberts, D. Ezell, T. Goldsmith, R. Hazen, N. Lederman, … R. Wood (Eds.), Teaching about evolution and the nature of science (pp. 66-73). Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences.