Student and Faculty Views on Process of Science Skills at a Large, Research-Intensive University

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665-701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2009). Project 2061: Benchmarks for scientific literacy (Chapter 1). Washington, DC: Author. http://www.project2061.oig/publications/bsl/online/index.php?chapter=1
   Google Scholar
• American Association of Colleges and Universities. (2013). It takes more than a major: Employer priorities for college learning and student success. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bao, L., Cai, T., Koenig, K., Fang, K., & Han, J. (2009). Learning and scientific reasoning. Science, 323, 586-587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, C., & Smith, D. (Eds.). (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate biology: A Call to Action. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Available at http://visionandchange.org/files/2011/03/Revised-Vision-and-Change-Final-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brickman, P., Gormally, C., Francom, G., Jardeleza, S., Schuette, V., Jordan, C., & Kanizay, L. (2012). Media-savvy scientific literacy: Developing critical evaluation skills by investigating scientific claims. The American Biology Teacher, 74, 374-379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervato, C., Gallus, W. A., Slade, M., Kawaler, S., & Marengo, M. (2015). It takes a village to make a scientist: Reflections of a faculty learning community. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44, 28-35.
   Google Scholar
• Coil, D., Wenderoth, M., Cunningham, M., & Dirks, C. (2010). Teaching the process of science: Faculty perceptions and an effective methodology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9, 524-535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, D. T. (2011). Building on the Common Core. Educational Leadership, 68, 16-20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirks, C., & Cunningham, M. (2006). Enhancing diversity in science: Is teaching science process skills the answer? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 5, 218-226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elliot, E. R., Reason, R. D., Coffman, C. R., Gangloff, E. J., Raker, J. R., Powell-Coffman, J. A., & Ogilvie, C. A. (2016). Improved student learning through a faculty learning community: How faculty collaboration transformed a large-enrollment course from lecture to student-centered. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15, 1-14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gott, R., Duggan, S., & Johnson, P (1999). What do practising applied scientists do and what are the implications for science education? Research in Science and Technology Education, 17, 97-107.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, W., Reiff, R., & Phillipson, T. (2002). Scientists’ conceptions of scientific inquiry: Voices from the front. In Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning. Change, 33, 10-17, 66.
   Google Scholar
• Landivar, C. (2013). Disparities in STEM employment by sex, race, and Hispanic origin. American Community Survey Reports, 1-25. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Bell, R. (2001). If we want to talk the talk, we must also walk the walk: The nature of science, professional development, and educational reform. In J. Rhoton & P S. Bowers (Eds.), Professional development: Planning and design (pp. 25-42). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mestre, J. (2008). Learning goals in undergraduate STEM education and evidence for achieving them. Commissioned paper presented at NRC workshop on Evidence on Selected Promising Practices in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education. Washington, DC: NRC.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, E., & Cervato, C. (2016). Quantifying the level of inquiry in a reformed introductory geology course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 64, 125-137.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013, April). Appendix H—Understanding the scientific enterprise: The nature of science in the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS Release). Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards
   Google Scholar
• Stone, E. M. (2014). Guiding students to develop an understanding of scientific inquiry: A science skills approach to instruction and assessment. CBE— Life Sciences Education, 13, 90-101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, K. (2009). Talking to learn: Why biology students should be talking in classrooms and how to make it happen. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 8, 89-94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobias, S. (1992). Revitalizing undergraduate science: Why some things work and most don t. Tuscon, AZ: Research Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wilke, R. R., & Straits, W. J. (2005). Practical advice for teaching inquirybased science process skills in the biological sciences. The American Biology Teacher, 67, 534-540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, W. (2009). Innovations in teaching undergraduate biology and why we need them. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 25, 93-112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20, 99-149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar