Using Technology to Facilitate Grading Consistency in Large Classes

References

• Australian Council for Educational Research (2009), Australasian Survey of Student Engagement: Australasian Student Engagement Report, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, Diane F. (2010), "Enhancing Group Decision Making: An Exercise to Reduce Shared Information Bias," Journal of Management Education, 34 (2), 249-279.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, Sue (2009), "Marking and Moderation in the UK: False Assumptions and Wasted Resources," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34 (2), 209-220.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Sally (2010), "Assessing for Learning and Smarter Feedback," paper presented at the Teaching and Educational Development Institute (TEDI) Seminar Series, University of Queensland, Brisbane, August 20.
   Google Scholar
• Cathcart, Abby, and Gian Luca Casali (2008), "Dumbing Down? Reflections on Using Audience Response Technology," paper presented at the Effective Teaching and Learning Conference, Brisbane, October 30-31.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, Douglas (2005), Clickers in the Classroom—How to Enhance Science Teaching Using Classroom Response Systems, San Francisco: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, Kerry, and Peter Docherty (2011), "Reducing Variation in the Assessment of Student Writing," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36 (1), 109-124.
   Google Scholar
• Janis, Irving L. (1982), Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes, 2d ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Kift, Sally (2006), "Using an Audience Response System to Enhance Student Engagement in Large Group Orientation: A Law Faculty Case Study," in Audience Response Systems in Higher Education: Applications and Cases, David A. Banks, ed., London: Information Science, pp. 80-95.
   Google Scholar
• Muncy, James A. (2008), "The Orientation Evaluation Matrix (OEM): Are Students Customers or Products?" Marketing Education Review, 18 (3), 15-23.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, Larry, and Abby Cathcart (2010), "Strategies to Facilitate Grading Consistency in Large Classes," paper presented at the International Conference on the First-Year Experience, Maui, Hawaii, June 7-10.
   Google Scholar
• Nelligan, P. (2007), "Utilising an ICT Tool for Moderating, Marking and Managing Assessment in Large Tertiary Classes," in Enhancing Teaching and Learning Through Assessment: Deriving an Appropriate Model, Steve Frankland, ed., Dordrecht: Springer, 402-416.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, Susan (2007), "Assessment Moderation: Constructing the Marks and Constructing the Students," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32 (6), 645-656.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, Jon Anderson (1997), "Evaluation Software: Improving Consistency and Reliability of Performance Rating," paper presented at the 1997 Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education conference, Uppsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Price, Margaret (2005), "Assessment Standards: The Role of Communities of Practice and the Scholarship of Assessment," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30 (3), 215-230.
   Google Scholar
• Price, Margaret, Jude Carroll, Berry O'Donovan, and Chris Rust (2010), "If I Was Going There I Wouldn't Start from Here: A Critical Commentary on Current Assessment Practice," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36 (4), 479-492.
   Google Scholar
• Race, Phil (2010), Making Learning Happen, 2d ed., London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stobart, Gordon (2008), Testing Times: The Uses and Abuses of Assessment, Oxon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson Sprague, Elaine, and Darren W. Dahl (2010), "Learning to Click: An Evaluation of the Personal Response System Clicker Technology in Introductory Marketing Courses," Journal of Marketing Education, 32 (1), 93-103.
   Google Scholar