DUI recidivism by intervention adherence: a multiple risk factor approach

References

• Centers for Disease Control. Vital signs: alcohol-impaired driving among adults-United States, 2010. MMWR 2011;60:1351–1356.
   Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic safety facts: alcohol-impaired driving, data 2013. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2014:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hedlund J. If they didn’t drink, would they crash anyway? The role of alcohol in traffic crashes. Alcohol Drugs Driving 1994;10:115–125.
   Google Scholar
• Hedlund J. Meta-analysis helps to define the policy-relevance of drink driving research. Addiction 1995;90:1593–1594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic safety facts: alcohol-impaired driving, 2007 data. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2008:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic safety administration. Traffic safety facts: alcohol-impaired driving, 2012 data. Washington, D.C.: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Brown TG, Dongier M, Ouimet MC, Tremblay J, Chanut F, Legault L, Kin NNY. The role of demographic characteristics and readiness to change in 12-month outcome from two distinct brief interventions for impaired drivers. J Subst Abuse Treat 2012;42:383–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C’de Baca J, Miller WR, Lapham S. A multiple risk factor approach for predicting DWI recidivism. J Subst Abuse Treat 2001;21:207–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nochajski TH, Stasiewicz PR. Relapse to driving under the influence (DUI): a review. Clin Psychol Rev 2006;26:179–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nochajski TH. Alcohol program completion: does it matter for DWI recidivism? Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1999;23:239.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson AA, Gardner S, Xu X, Costello H. The impact of remedial intervention on 3-year recidivism among first-time DUI offenders in Mississippi. Accid Anal Prev 2009;41:1080–1086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson SE, Belkin K, LaPlante DA, Bosworth L, Shaffer HJ. A prospective study of psychiatric comorbidity and recidivism among repeat DUI offenders. Arch Sci Psychol 2015;3:8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schell TL, Chan KS, Morral AR. Predicting DUI recidivism: personality, attitudinal, and behavioral risk factors. Drug Alcohol Depend 2006;82:33–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapham SC, C’de Baca J, McMillan GP, Lapidus J. Psychiatric disorders in a sample of repeat impaired-driving offenders. J Stud Alcohol 2006;67:707–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marowitz LA. Predicting DUI recidivism: Blood alcohol concentration and driver record factors. Accid Anal Prev 1998;30:545–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nochajski TH, Wieczorek WF. Driver characteristics as a function of DWI history. In: Laurell H, Schlyter F, eds. Alcohol, drugs and traffic safety-T2000. Stockholm: Ekonomi-Print: 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Cavaiola AA, Strohmetz DB, Abreo SD. Characteristics of DUI recidivists: a 12-year follow-up study of first time DUI offenders. Addict Behav 2007;32:855–861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells-Parker E, Bangert-Drowns R, McMillen R, Williams M. Final results from a meta-analysis of remedial interventions with drink/drive offenders. Addiction 1995;90:907–926.
   Google Scholar
• Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Snow RW. Recidivism among convicted drinking drivers: an analysis of DUI offenders referred to the Mississippi alcohol safety education program in 1992. Starkville, MS: Mississippi State University; 1996;1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, Monteiro MG. AUDIT: the alcohol use disorders identification test: guidelines for use in primary health care (2nd ed). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Miller WR, Tonigan JS, Longabaugh R. The drinker inventory of consequences (DrInC): an instrument for assessing adverse consequences of alcohol abuse (Test Manual). NIAAA project MATCH monograph series, Vol. 4, NIH Publication No. (ADM) 95–3911. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services; 1995
   Google Scholar
• Nochajski TH, Miller BA, Wieczorek WF. Training manual for the research institute on addictions self-inventory. Buffalo, CO: Research Institute on Addictions; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Cox DR. Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc 1972;34(seriesB):187–220.
   Google Scholar
• Box-Steffensmeier JM, Jones BS. Event history moeling: a guide for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau. Available from: http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=CF ( accessed 12 January 2016).
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau. Available from: http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=CF ( accessed 12 January 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Smith L. Psychotherapy, classism, and the poor: conspicuous by their absence. Am Psychol 2005;60:687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilmer B, Nicosia N, Heaton P, Midgette G. Efficacy of frequent monitoring with swift, certain, and modest sanctions for violations: insights from South Dakota’s 24/7 sobriety project. Am J Public Health 2013;103:e37–e43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frost CJ, Phillips ME, Tollefson D, Werstak J. What we know about offenders who drive under the influence: analysis of court case file reviews. Accid Anal Prev 2006;38:84–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar