Peer feedback as an aid to learning – What do we want? Feedback. When do we want it? Now!

References

• Archer J, Norcini J, Southgate L, Heard S, Davies H. Mini-PAT (Peer Assessment Tool): A valid component of a National Assessment Programme in the UK?. Adv Health Sci Educ 2008; 13: 181–192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asghar A. Reciprocal peer coaching and its use as a formative assessment strategy for first-year students. Assess Eval High Educ 2010; 35(4)403–417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman D, Savage C, Wahlstrom R, Sandahl C. Teaching group dynamics – Do we know what we are doing? An approach to evaluation. Med Teach 2008; 30(1)55–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs J. Teaching for quality learning at university, 2nd. SRHE and Open University Press, BerkshireUK 2003
   Google Scholar
• Bing-You RG, Paterson P, Levine MA. Feedback falling on deaf ears: Residents’ receptivity to feedback tempered by sender credibility. Med Teach 1997; 19: 40–44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehler ML, Rogers DA, Schwind CJ, Mayforth R, Quin J, Williams RG, Dunnington G. An investigation of medical student reactions to feedback: A randomised control trial. Med Educ 2006; 40: 746–749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud D. Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Stud Contin Educ 2000; 22(2)151–167
   Google Scholar
• Braend AM, Gran SF, Frich JC, Lindbaek M. Medical students' clinical performance in general practice – Triangulating assessments from patients, teachers and students. Med Teach 2010; 32(4)333–339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazeau C, Boyd L, Crosson J. Changing an existing OSCE to a teaching tool: The making of a teaching OSCE. Acad Med 2002; 77(9)932
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown E, Gibbs G, Glover C. 2003. Evaluation tools for investigating the impact of assessment regimes on student learning. <http://bio.ltsn.ac.uk/journal/vol2/beej-2-5.htm>.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers SL, Schmittgen J, Allan CR. Evaluation of peer teaching in a pharmaceutical laboratory. Am J Pharm Educ 2000; 64: 283–288
   Google Scholar
• Cox R, 2008. Vicarious learning and case-based teaching: Developing health science students’ clinical reasoning skills. Teach Learn Res Brief Oct 2008, No. 54. <www.tlrp.org>
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behaviour in work teams. Adm Sci Q 1999; 44: 350–383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA 1983; 250: 777–781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans DJR, Cuffe T. Near-peer teaching in anatomy: An Approach for deeper learning. Anat Sci Educ 2009; 2: 227–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel AS, Leonard MW, Denham CR. Fair and just culture, team behaviour, and leadership engagement: The tools to achieve high reliability. Health Serv Res 2006; 4(2)1690–1709
   Google Scholar
• Gielen S, Peeters E, Dochy F, Onghena P, Struyven K. Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learn Instr 2010; 20: 304–315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn LG, MacFarlane A, Kelly M, Cantillon P, Murphy AW. Helping each other to learn – A process evaluation of peer assisted learning. BMC Med Educ 2006; 6: 18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heaven C, Clegg J, Maguire P. Transfer of communication skills training from workshop to workplace: The impact of clinical supervision. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 60: 313–325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning JM, Weidner TG, Marty MC. Peer assisted learning in clinical education: Literature review. Athl Train Educ J 2008; 3: 844–890
   Google Scholar
• Hewson MG, Little ML. Giving feedback: Verification of recommended techniques. J Gen Intern Med 1998; 13: 111–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernan WN, Quagliarello V, Green ML. Student faculty rounds: A peer-mediated learning activity for internal medicine clerkships. Med Teach 2005; 27(2)140–144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladyshewksy RK, Developing health professionals through the use of reciprocal peer coaching. In Herrmann A, Kulski MM, editors. Flexible futures in tertiary teaching. Proceedings of the 9th Annual teaching learning forum, 2000 February 2–4. Perth: Curtin University of Technology. <http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2000/ladyshewsky.html>
   Google Scholar
• Ladyshewsky RK. A quasi-experimental study of the differences in performance and clinical reasoning using individual learning versus reciprocal peer coaching. Physiother Theory Pract 2002; 18(1)17–31
   Google Scholar
• Lui NF, Carless D. Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teach High Educ 2006; 11(3)279–290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay J, Murphy DJ, Bowie P, Schuck M-L, Lough M, Eva KW. Development and testing of an assessment instrument for formative peer review of significant event analysis. Qual Saf Health Care 2007; 16: 150–153
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson MN, Schunn CD. The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instr Sci 2009; 37: 375–401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol D, MacFarlane-Dick D. Rethinking formative assessment in HE: A theoretical model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud High Educ 2006; 31(2)199–218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paskin Z, Peile E. Final year medical students’ views on simulated-based teaching: A comparison with best evidence medical education systematic review. Med Teach 2010; 32: 569–577
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patri M. The influence of peer feedback on self- and peer- assessment of oral skills. Lang Test 2002; 19(2)109–131
   Google Scholar
• Sargent J, Mann K, Sinclair D, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. Challenges in multisource feedback: Intended and unintended outcomes. Med Educ 2007; 41: 583–591
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shin E, Wilkins E, Ainsworth J. Perception vs reality peer feedback practices to enhance preservice teacher reflection during an elementary early clinical experience. 2009, <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p35597_index.html> Accessed 6 June 2009
   Google Scholar
• Ten Cate ThJ, Durning S. Dimensions and psychology of peer teaching in medical education. Med Teach 2007a; 29: 546–552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Cate ThJ, Durning S. Peer teaching in medical education: Twelve reasons to move from theory to practice. Med Teach 2007b; 29: 591–599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping KJ. Trends in peer learning. Educ Psychol 2005; 25(6)631–645
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg I, Admiraal W, Pilot A. Peer assessment in university teaching: Evaluating seven course designs. Assess Eval High Educ 2006; 31(1)19–36
   Google Scholar
• Van Gennip NAE, Seger MSR, Tillema HH. Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: The role of interpersonal variables and conceptions. Learn Instr 2010; 20: 280–290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver M. Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assess Eval High Educ 2006; 31(3)379–394
   Google Scholar
• Westwood OMR, Leinster S, Weinberg JR. A health care curriculum for the 21st century: Time for flexibility? J. R Soc Med 2008; 101(2)59–62
   Google Scholar