441
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Communication

The development and validation of a short form of the STERLinG: A practical, valid and reliable tool to evaluate teacher competencies to encourage reflective learning

, &
Pages 864-866 | Published online: 18 Jul 2013

References

  • Boud D, Walker D. Promoting reflection in professional courses: The challenge of context. Stud High Educ 1998; 23: 191–206
  • Henderson E, Berlin A, Freeman G, Fuller J. Twelve tips for promoting significant event analysis to enhance reflection in undergraduate medical students. Med Teach 2002; 24: 121–124
  • Kreiter CD, Lakshman V. Investigating the use of sampling for maximising the efficiency of student-generated faculty teaching evaluations. Med Educ 2005; 39: 171–175
  • Mann K, Gordon J, MacLeod A. Reflection and reflective practice in health profession education: A systematic review. Adv Health Sci Educ 2009; 14: 595–621
  • O'Rourke T. 1999. Increasing response rates: Specific applications. Am J Health Stud 15:164–166.
  • Porter SR, Whitcomb ME, Weitzer WH. Multiple surveys of students and survey fatigue. New Dir Instit Res 2004; 121: 63–73
  • Roszkowski MJ, Bean AG. Believe it or not! Longer questionnaires have lower response rates. J Business Psychol 1990; 4: 495–509
  • Schaub-de Jong MA, Cohen-Schotanus J, Dekker H, Verkerk MA. The role of peer meetings for professional development in health science education: A qualitative analysis of reflective essays. Adv Health Sci Educ 2009; 14: 503–513
  • Schaub-de Jong MA, Schönrock-Adema J, Cohen-Schotanus J, Dekker H, Verkerk MA. Development of a student rating scale to evaluate teachers’ competencies for facilitating reflective learning. Med Educ 2011; 45: 155–165
  • Schön DA. Educating the reflective practitioner. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 1987
  • Smits N, Vorst HCM. Reducing the length of questionnaires through structurally incomplete designs: An illustration. Learn Individ Differ 2007; 17: 25–34
  • Stark P, Roberts C, Newable D, Bax N. Discovering professionalism through guided reflection. Med Teach 2006; 28: e25–e31
  • Stern DT. Measuring medical professionalism. Oxford University Press, New York, NY 2006
  • Stuive I, Kiers HAL, Timmerman ME, Ten Berge JMF. The empirical verification of an assignment of items to subtests: The Oblique Multiple Group Method versus the Confirmatory Common Factor Analysis. Educ Psychol Measurement 2008; 68: 923–939
  • Van Geest JB, Johnson TP, Welch VL. 2007. Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians: A systematic review. Eval Health Profes 30:303–321.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.