References
- Abrams R, Davoli C, Du F, Knapp III W, Paull D. 2008. Altered vision near the hands. Cognition 107:1035–1047
- Alibali M, Nathan M. 2012. Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners' and teachers' gestures. J Learn Sci 21:247–286
- Cierniak G, Scheiter K, Gerjets P. 2009. Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load? Comput Human Behav 25:315–324
- Cohen J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates
- Colonnesi C, Stams G, Koster I, Noom M. 2010. The relation between pointing and language development: A meta-analysis. Dev Rev 30:352–366
- Cosman J, Vecera S. 2010. Attention affects visual perceptual processing near the hand. Psychol Sci 21:1254–1258
- de Koning B, Tabbers H, Rikers R, Paas F. 2009. Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for research and design. Educ Psychol Rev 21:113–140
- Dwyer F. 1972. A guide for improving visualized instruction. Pennsylvania: State College
- Ginns P. 2006. Integrating information: A meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects. Learn Instruc 16:511–525
- Hattie J. 2009. Visible learning. London: Routledge
- Hulme C, Monk A, Ives S. 1987. Some experimental studies of multi-sensory teaching: The effects of manual tracing on children's paired-associate learning. Br J Dev Psychol 5:299–307
- Johnson C, Mayer R. 2012. An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. J Exp Psychol Appl 18:178–191
- Joseph JH, Dwyer FM. 1984. The effects of prior knowledge, presentation mode and visual realism on student achievement. J Exp Ed 52:110–121
- Justice L, Ezell H. 2004. Print referencing: An emergent literacy enhancement strategy and its clinical applications. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 35:185–193
- Kalenine S, Pinet L, Gentaz E. 2011. The visual and visuo-haptic exploration of geometrical shapes increases their recognition in preschoolers. Int J Behav Dev 35:18–26
- Leppink J, Paas F, Van Der Vleuten C, Van Gog T, Van Merriënboer J. 2013. Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load. Behav Res Meth 45:1058–1072
- Mayer R. 2008. Old advice for new researchers. Educ Psychol Rev 20:19–28
- Montessori M. 1912. The Montessori method. London: Heineman
- Moreno R, Reislein M, Ozogul G. 2010. Using virtual peers to guide visual attention during learning. J Med Psychol 22:52–60
- Salomon G. 1984. Television is “easy ” and print is “tough”: The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributes. J Ed Psych 78:647–658
- Spence C. 2010. Crossmodal spatial attention. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1191:182–200
- Sweller J. 2010. Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educ Psychol Rev 22:123–138
- Sweller J, Ayres P, Kalyuga S. 2011. Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer
- Tarmizi R, Sweller J. 1988. Guidance during mathematical problem solving. J Educ Psychol 80:424–436
- Van Gog T, Paas F, Marcus N, Ayres P, Sweller J. 2009. The mirror neuron system and observational learning: Implications for the effectiveness of dynamic visualizations. Educ Psychol Rev 21:21–30
- Van Merriënboer J, Sweller J. 2010. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: Design principles and strategies. Med Educ 44:85–93
- Zeidner M. 1998. Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York: Plenum Press