10,398
Views
173
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Twelve Tips

Twelve Tips for programmatic assessment

, , , &

References

  • Bok HG, Teunissen PW, Favier RP, Rietbroek NJ, Theyse LF, Brommer H, Haarhuis JC, van Beukelen P, van der Vleuten CP, Jaarsma DA. 2013. Programmatic assessment of competency-based workplace learning: When theory meets practice. BMC Med Educ 13:123
  • Dannefer EF, Henson LC. 2007. The portfolio approach to competency-based assessment at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine. Acad Med 82:493–502
  • De Rijdt C, Stes A, van der Vleuten C, Dochy F. 2013. Influencing variables and moderators of transfer of learning to the workplace within the area of staff development in higher education: Research review. Educ Res Rev 8:48–74
  • Dijkstra J, Galbraith R, Hodges BD, McAvoy PA, McCrorie P, Southgate LJ, van der Vleuten CP, Wass V, Schuwirth LW. 2012. Expert validation of fit-for-purpose guidelines for designing programmes of assessment. BMC Med Educ 12:20
  • Dolmans DH, De Grave W, Wolfhagen IH, van der Vleuten CP. 2005. Problem-based learning: Future challenges for educational practice and research. Med Educ 39:732–741
  • Driessen EW, Heeneman S, van der Vleuten CPM. 2013. Portfolio assessment. In: Dent JA, Harden RMM, editors. A practical guide for medical teachers. Edinburgh: Elsevier Health Sciences. pp 314–323
  • Driessen EW, Overeem K. 2013. Mentoring. In: Walsh K, editor. Oxford textbook of medical education. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp 265–284
  • Driessen EW, van Tartwijk J, Govaerts M, Teunissen P, van der Vleuten CP. 2012. The use of programmatic assessment in the clinical workplace: A Maastricht case report. Med Teach 34:226–231
  • Ericsson KA. 2004. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 79:S70–S81
  • Frye AW, Hemmer PA. 2012. Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE Guide No. 67. Med Teach 34:e288–e299
  • Govaerts MJB, van der Vleuten CPM. 2013. Validity in work-based assessment: Expanding our horizons. Med Educ 47:1164–1174
  • Govaerts MJ, van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW, Muijtjens AM. 2007. Broadening perspectives on clinical performance assessment: Rethinking the nature of in-training assessment. Adv Health Sci Educ 12:239–260
  • Harrison CJ, Könings KD, Molyneux A, Schuwirth LW, Wass V, van der Vleuten CP. 2013. Web-based feedback after summative assessment: How do students engage? Med Educ 47:734–744
  • Hattie J, Timperley H. 2007. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res 77:81–112
  • Hodder RV, Rivington R, Calcutt L, Hart I. 1989. The effectiveness of immediate feedback during the objective structured clinical examination. Med Educ 23:184–188
  • Könings KD, Brand-Gruwel S, Merriënboer JJ. 2005. Towards more powerful learning environments through combining the perspectives of designers, teachers, and students. Br J Educ Psychol 75:645–660
  • Muijtjens AM, Timmermans I, Donkers J, Peperkamp R, Medema H, Cohen-Schotanus J, Thoben A, Wenink AC, van der Vleuten CP. 2010. Flexible electronic feedback using the virtues of progress testing. Med Teach 32:491–495
  • Ruhe V, Boudreau JD. 2013. The 2011 program evaluation standards: A framework for quality in medical education programme evaluations. J Eval Clin Pract 19:925–932
  • Sargeant JM, Mann KV, van der Vleuten CP, Metsemakers JF. 2009. Reflection: A link between receiving and using assessment feedback. Adv Health Sci Educ: Theory Pract 14:399–410
  • Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM. 2011. Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Med Teach 33:478–485
  • Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CP. 2012. Programmatic assessment and Kane’s validity perspective. Med Educ 46:38–48
  • Shute VJ. 2008. Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res 78:153–189
  • Steinert Y. 2014. Medical education and faculty development. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society. pp 1344–1348
  • Stephens JC, Graham AC. 2010. Toward an empirical research agenda for sustainability in higher education: Exploring the transition management framework. J Cleaner Prod 18:611–618
  • van der Vleuten CPM. 1996. The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ 1:41–67
  • van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW. 2005. Assessing professional competence: From methods to programmes. Med Educ 39:309–317
  • van der Vleuten CP, Norman GR, De Graaff E. 1991. Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: Issues of reliability. Med Educ 25:110–118
  • van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW, Driessen EW, Dijkstra J, Tigelaar D, Baartman LK, van Tartwijk J. 2012. A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Med Teach 34:205–214
  • van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW, Scheele F, Driessen EW, Hodges B. 2010. The assessment of professional competence: Building blocks for theory development. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 24:703–719
  • Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CP, Lingard L. 2012. Learning from clinical work: The roles of learning cues and credibility judgements. Med Educ 46:192–200

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.