The transferability of Western concepts to other cultures: Validation of the Zuckerman–Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire in a Saudi Arabic context

References

• Al-Eraky MM, Donkers J, Wajid G, Van Merrienboer JJG. 2014. A Delphi study of medical professionalism in Arabian countries: The Four-Gates model. Med Teach 36(S1):S8–S16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlFaris E, Abdulgader A, Alkhenizan A. 2006. Towards evidence-based medical education in Saudi medical schools. Ann Saudi Med 26:429–432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aluja A, Rossier J, Garcia LF, Angleitner A, Kuhlman M, Zuckerman M. 2006. A cross-cultural shortened form of the ZKPQ (ZKPQ-50-cc) adapted to English, French, German, and Spanish languages. Pers Individ Differ 41:619–628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi R. 2006. Associations between Hofstede’s cultural constructs and social desirability response bias. J Bus Ethics 65:43–53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bin Abdulrahman K. 2011. Saudi Arabia does not need an Abraham Flexner. Med Teach 33:74–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bin Abdulrahman KA. 2012. The value of medical education research in Saudi Arabia. Med Teach 34(S1):S1–S3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bin Abdulrahman K, Gibbs T, Harden R. 2013. The medical education journey continues. Med Teach 35(S1):S5–S7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bin Abdulrahman K, Harden R, Patricío M. 2012. Medical education in Saudi Arabia: An exciting journey. Med Teach 34(S1):S4–S5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond R, Smith PB. 1996. Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychol Bull 119:111–137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field A. 2009. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher EB. 1988. Convergence or divergence in third world medical education? An Arab study. J Health Soc Behav 29:385–400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganster DC, Hennessey HW, Luthans F. 1983. Social desirability response effects: Three alternative models. Acad Manage J 26:321–331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons JL, Zellner JA, Rudek DJ. 1999. Effects of language and meaningfulness on the use of extreme response style by Spanish–English bilinguals. Cross-Cult Res 33:369–381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomà-i-Freixanet M, Valero S, Puntí J, Zuckerman M. 2004. Psychometric properties of the Zuckerman–Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire in a Spanish sample. Eur J Psychol Assess 20:134–146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harzing AW. 2006. Response styles in cross-national survey research: A 26-country study. Int J Cross Cultur Manag 6:243–266
   Google Scholar
• Hatcher L. 1994. A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ. 2005. Cultures and organisations: software of the mind. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill
   Google Scholar
• Hojat M, Erdmann JB, Gonnella JS. 2013. Personality assessments and outcomes in medical education and the practice of medicine: AMEE Guide No. 79. Med Teach 35:e1267–e1301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojat M, Zuckerman M, Magee M, Mangione S, Nasca T, Vergare M, Gonnella JS. 2005. Empathy in medical students as related to specialty interest, personality, and perceptions of mother and father. Pers Individ Differ 39:1205–1215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katigbak MS, Church AT, Guanzon-Lapeña MaA, Carlota AJ, del Pilar GH. 2002. Are indigenous personality dimensions culture specific? Philippine inventories and the five-factor model. J Pers Soc Psychol 82:89–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo-Seva U, Ten Berge JMF. 2006. Tucker’s congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology 2:57–64
   Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, Zonderman AB, Costa PT Jr, Bond MH, Paunonen SV. 1996. Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. J Pers Soc Psychol 70:552–566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehmood SI, Khan MA, Walsh KM, Borleffs JCC. 2013. Personality types and specialist choices in medical students. Med Teach 35:63–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. 1994. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill
   Google Scholar
• Rammstedt B, Goldberg LR, Borg I. 2010. The measurement equivalence of the Big-Five factor markers for persons with different levels of education. J Res Pers 44:53–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rammstedt B, Kemper CJ. 2011. Measurement equivalence of the Big Five: Shedding further light on potential causes of the educational bias. J Res Pers 45:121–125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossier J, Veradi S, Massoudi K, Aluja A. 2008. Psychometric properties of the French version of the Zuckerman–Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire. Int J Clin Health Psychol 8:203–217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönrock-Adema J, Heijne-Penninga M, Van Hell EA, Cohen-Schotanus J. 2009. Necessary steps in factor analysis: Enhancing validation studies of educational instruments. The PHEEM applied to clerks as an example. Med Teach 31:e226–e232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith PB. 2004. Acquiescent response bias as an aspect of cultural communication style. J Cross Cult Psychol 35:50–61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F, White LA. 2012. Adaptive testing with multidimensional pairwise preference items: Improving the efficiency of personality and other noncognitive assessments. Organ Res Methods 15:463–487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuive I, Kiers HAL, Timmerman ME, Ten Berge JMF. 2008. The empirical verification of an assignment of items to subtests: The Oblique Multiple Group Method versus the Confirmatory Common Factor Method. Educ Psychol Meas 68:923–939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekian A, Boker AMA, Norcini J. 2014. What does it take to become an effective medical educator? Med Teach 36(S1):S1–S2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telmesani A, Zaini RG, Ghazi HO. 2011. Medical education in Saudi Arabia: A review of recent developments and future challenges. East Mediterr Health J 17:703–707
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van de Mortel TF. 2008. Faking it: Social desirability response bias in self-report research. Aust J Adv Nurs 25:40–48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Vijver F, Leung K. 1997. Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. London: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Van de Vijver FJR, Hambleton RK. 1996. Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. Eur Psychol 1:89–99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hemert DA, Van de Vijver FJR, Poortinga YH, Georgas J. 2002. Structural and functional equivalence of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire within and between countries. Pers Individ Differ 33:1229–1249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman M. 2002. Zuckerman–Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ): An alternative five-factorial model. In: de Raad B, Perugini M, editors. Big Five assessment. Kirkland, WA: Hogrefe & Huber. pp 377–396
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman M, Kuhlman DM, Joireman J, Teta P, Kraft M. 1993. A comparison of the three structural models for the personality: the Big Three, the Big Five, and the Alternative Five. J Person Soc Psychol 65:757–768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar