Application of the Self-Generation Effect to the Learning of Blissymbols by Persons Presenting with a Severe Aphasia

References

• Barrett, A. M., Crucian, G. P., Schwartz, R. L., & Heilman, K. M. (2000).Testing memory for self-generated items in dementia: Method makes a difference. Neurology, 54, 1258–1264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, A. R., & Fritz H. (1998). Can people who have aphasia learn iconic codes? Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 14, 184–196.
   Google Scholar
• Bertoni, B., Stoffel, A., & Weniger, D. (1991). Communicating with pictographs: A graphic approach to the improvement of communicative interactions. Aphasiology, 5, 341–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaravalloti, N. D., & Deluca J. (2002). Self-generation as a means of maximizing learning in multiple sclerosis: An application of the generation effect. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 83(8), 1070–1079.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dick, M. B., & Kean M. L. (1989). Memory for internally generated words in Alzheimer-type dementia: Breakdown in encoding & semantic memory. Brain & Cognition, 9(1), 88–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuller, D. R. (1997). Initial study into the effects of translucency and complexity on the learning of Blissymbols by children and adults with normal cognitive abilities. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 13, 30–39.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, D. R., & Lloyd L. L. (1987). A study of physical and semantic characteristics of a graphic symbol system as predictors of perceived complexity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 26–35.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, J. M., & Hampton J. A. (1985). Semantic memory & the self-generation effect: Some tests of the lexical activation hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 11(4), 732–741.
   Google Scholar
• Ghatala, E. S. (1981). The effect of internal generation of information on memory performance. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 443–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B. (2001). The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Graf, P. (1980).Two consequences of generating: Increased inter & intraword organization of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behaviour, 19, 316–327.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L. (1978). On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behaviour, 17, 649–667.
   Google Scholar
• Kinjo, H., & Snodgrass J. G. (2000). Does the generation effect occur for pictures. American Journal of Psychology, 113, 95–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornell, N., & Terrace H. S. (2007). The generation effect in monkeys. Psychological Science, 18, 682–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koul, R. K., Corwin, M., & Hayes, S. (2005). Production of graphic symbol sentences by individuals with aphasia: Efficacy of a computer-based augmentative & alternative communication intervention. Brain & Language, 92, 58–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koul, R. K., & Harding R. (1998). Identification and production of graphic symbols by individuals with aphasia: Efficacy of a software application. Journal of Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 14, 11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Koul, R. K., & Lloyd L. L. (1998). Comparison of graphic symbol learning in individuals with aphasia and right hemisphere brain damage. Brain & Language, 62, 394–421.
   Google Scholar
• Lipinska, B., Backman, L., Mantyla, T., & Viitanen, M. (1994). Effectiveness of self-generated cues in early Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 809–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, J., Briggs, A., & Cain, K. (2003). An examination of the value of the generation effect for learning new material. Journal of General Psychology, 130, 171–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction (5th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, D. L., & Satake E. (2006). Research and statistical methods in communication sciences and disorders. New York, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, D., Shelton, J. R., Weinrich, M., & Cox, D. (2000). The utility of computerized visual communication for improving natural language in chronic global aphasia: Implications for approaches to treatment in global aphasia. Aphasiology, 21, 795–826.
   Google Scholar
• McElroy, L. A., & Slamecka N. J. (1982). Memorial consequences for generating nonwords: Implications for semantic-memory interpretations of the generation effect. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 21, 249–259.
   Google Scholar
• McFarland C. E., Frey, T. J., & Rhodes, D. D. (1980). Retrieval of internally versus externally generated words in episodic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behaviour, 19, 210–225.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. B., Hunt, R. R., & Schmitt, F. A. (1986). The generation effect and reality monitoring: Evidence from dementia and normal aging. Journal of Gerentology, 41, 79–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Multhaup, K. S., & Balota D. A. (1997). Generation effects & source memory in healthy older adults and in adults with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neuropsychology, 11, 382–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nairne, J. S., Pusen, C., & Widner, R. L. (1985). Representation in the mental lexicon: Implications for theories of the self-generation effect. Memory & Cognition, 13, 183–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nairne, J. S., & Widner R. L. (1987). Generation effects with nonwords: The role of test appropriateness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 3, 164–171.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, A., Chiaravalloti, N., Arango-Lasprilla, J.C., Lengenfelder, J., & DeLuca, J. (2007). An investigation of the differential effect of self-generation to improve learning and memory in multiple sclerosis and traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 17, 273–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, D. N., Neely, J. H., & Burns, D. J. (1986). The self-generation effect: Further tests of the lexical activation hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 14, 246–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peynircioglu, Z. F. (1989). The generation effect with pictures and nonsense figures. Acta Psychologica, 70, 153–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pring, L., Freestone, S. F., & Katan S. A. (1990). Recalling pictures and words: Reversing the generation effect. Current Psychology: Research & Reviews, 9, 35–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slamecka, N. J., & Graf P. (1978). The self-generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 592–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souliez, L., Pasquier, F., Lebert, F., Leconte, P., & Petit, H. (1996). Generation effect in short term verbal and visuospatial memory: Comparisons between dementia of the Alzheimer type and dementia of the frontal lobe type. Cortex, 32, 347–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, S. W., Hertel, P. T., McCallum, M. C., & Ellis, H. C. (1979). Cognitive effort and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 592–604.
   Google Scholar
• Wills, W. T., Soraci, S. A., Chechile, R. A., & Taylor, H. A. (2000). “Aha” effects in the generation of pictures. Memory & Cognition, 28, 939–948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinrich, M., Shelton, J. R., McCall, D., & Cox, D. M. (1997). Generalization from single sentence to multisentence production in severely aphasic patients. Brain & Language, 58, 327–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar