Fertility in midlife women

References

• Montan S. Increased risk in the elderly parturient. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007;19:110–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salem Yaniv S, Levy A, Wiznitzer A, Holcberg G, Mazor M, Sheiner E. A significant linear association exists between advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010;283:755–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carolan M, Frankowska D. Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome: A review of the evidence. Midwifery 2011;27:793–801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaway LK, Lust K, McIntyre HD. Pregnancy outcomes in women of very advanced maternal age. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;45:12–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird DT, Collins J, Egozcue J, et al. Fertility and ageing. Hum Reprod Update 2005;11:261–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnus P, Irgens LM, Haug K, et al. Cohort profile: The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:1146–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen AB, Waldenström U, Hjelmstedt A, Rasmussen S, Schytt E. Characteristics of women who are pregnant with their first baby at an advanced age. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012;91:353–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleicher N, Weghofer A, Barad D. Too old for IVF: are we discriminating against older women? J Assist Reprod Genet 2007;24:639–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang MY, Chiang CH, Hsieh TT, Soong YK, Hsu KH. Use of the antral follicle count to predict the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 1998;69:505–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faddy MJ, Gosden RG. A model conforming the decline in follicle numbers to the age of menopause in women. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1484–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods DC, Tilly JL. An evolutionary perspective on adult female germline stem cell function from flies to humans. Semin Reprod Med 2013;31:24–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods DC, Tilly JL. Autologous germline mitochondrial energy transfer (AUGMENT) in human assisted reproduction. Semin Reprod Med 2015;33:410–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffer GJ, Broekmans FJ, Dorland M, Habbema JD, Looman CW, te Velde ER. Antral follicle counts by transvaginal ultrasonography are related to age in women with proven natural fertility. Fertil Steril 1999;72:845–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming R, Deshpande N, Traynor I, Yates RW. Dynamics of FSH-induced follicular growth in subfertile women: relationship with age, insulin resistance, oocyte yield and anti-Mullerian hormone. Hum Reprod 2006;21:1436–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrim A, Elizur SE, Seidman DS, Rabinovici J, Wiser A, Dor J. Elevated day 3 FSH/LH ratio due to low LH concentrations predicts reduced ovarian response. Reprod Biomed Online 2006;12:418–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodstein F, Goldman MB, Cramer DW. Body mass index and ovulatory infertility. Epidemiology 1994;5:247–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates GW. Body weight control practice as a cause of infertility. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1985;28:632–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas D, Chvatal R, Reichert B, et al. Endometriosis: a premenopausal disease? Age pattern in 42,079 patients with endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012;286:667–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaghay M, Lessey BA. Uterine receptivity: alterations associated with benign gynecological disease. Semin Reprod Med 2007;25:461–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Q, St Clair JB, Fu T, Stratton P, Nieman LK. Reduced expression of biomarkers associated with the implantation window in women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2009;91:1686–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogle RH, Li A, Paulson RJ. Modulation of HOXA10 and other markers of endometrial receptivity by age and human chorionic gonadotropin in an endometrial explant model. Fertil Steril 2010;93:1255–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YA, Farquhar C, Sullivan EA. Donor age is a major determinant of success of oocyte donation/recipient programme. Hum Reprod 2012;27:118–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmaceda JP, Bernardini L, Ciuffardi I, et al. Oocyte donation in humans: a model to study the effect of age on embryo implantation rate. Hum Reprod 1994;9:2160–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares SR, Troncoso C, Bosch E, et al. Age and uterine receptiveness: predicting the outcome of oocyte donation cycles. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:4399–404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piltonen T, Koivunen R, Ruokonen A, Tapanainen JS. Ovarian age-related responsiveness to human chorionic gonadotropin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:3327–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen ME, Rasmussen RA, Kristensen SG, et al. In human granulosa cells from small antral follicles, androgen receptor mRNA and androgen levels in follicular fluid correlate with FSH receptor mRNA. Mol Hum Reprod 2011;17:63–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ata B, Kaplan B, Danzer H, et al. Array CGH analysis shows that aneuploidy is not related to the number of embryos generated. Reprod Biomed Online 2012;24:614–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XY, Ata B, Son WY, Buckett WM, Tan SL, Ao A. Chromosome abnormality rates in human embryos obtained from in-vitro maturation and IVF treatment cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 2010;21:552–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fragouli E, Wells D. Aneuploidy screening for embryo selection. Semin Reprod Med 2012;30:289–301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz M, Ryan A, Gemelos G, et al. Origins and rates of aneuploidy in human blastomeres. Fertil Steril 2012;97:395–401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassold T, Hunt P. To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat Rev Genet 2001;2:280–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao J, Wang ZB, Feng HL, et al. The root of reduced fertility in aged women and possible therapeutic options: Current status and future perspects. Mol Aspects Med 2014;38:54–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassold T, Jacobs PA, Leppert M, Sheldon M. Cytogenetic and molecular studies of trisomy 13. J Med Genet 1987;24:725–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao YL, Kikuchi K, Sun QY, Schatten H. Oocyte aging: cellular and molecular changes, developmental potential and reversal possibility. Hum Reprod Update 2009;15:573–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilding M, Dale B, Marino M, et al. Mitochondrial aggregation patterns and activity in human oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod 2001;16:909–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Blerkom J, Davis PW, Lee J. ATP content of human oocytes and developmental potential and outcome after in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1995;10:415–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichenlaub-Ritter U, Wieczorek M, Luke S, Seidel T. Age related changes in mitochondrial function and new approaches to study redox regulation in mammalian oocytes in response to age or maturation conditions. Mitochondrion 2011;11:783–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Höcker J, Schafer S, Weis S, Münscher C, Strowitzki T. Morphological-cytochemical and molecular genetic analyses of mitochondria in isolated human oocytes in the reproductive age. Mol Hum Reprod 1996;2:951–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen RP, Burton GJ. Mitochondrial dysfunction in reproduction. Mitochondrion 2004;4:577–600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arslan M, Bocca S, Mirkin S, Barroso G, Stadtmauer L, Oehninger S. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols for in vitro fertilization: two decades of experience after the birth of Elizabeth Carr. Fertil Steril 2005;84:555–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekmans FJ, Knauff EA, te Velde ER, Macklon NS, Fauser BC. Female reproductive ageing: current knowledge and future trends. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2007;18:58–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haadsma ML, Bukman A, Groen H, et al. The number of small antral follicles (2–6 mm) determines the outcome of endocrine ovarian reserve tests in a subfertile population. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1925–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodin T, Bergh T, Berglund L, Hadziosmanovic N, Holte J. Menstrual cycle length is an age-independent marker of female fertility: results from 6271 treatment cycles of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2008;90:1656–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekmans FJ, Kwee J, Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Lambalk CB. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update 2006;12:685–718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muttukrishna S, McGarrigle H, Wakim R, Khadum I, Ranieri DM, Serhal P. Antral follicle count, anti-mullerian hormone and inhibin B: predictors of ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology? BJOG 2005;112:1384–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Marca A, Stabile G, Artenisio AC, Volpe A. Serum anti-Mullerian hormone throughout the human menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod 2006;21:3103–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupesic S, Kurjak A. Predictors of IVF outcome by three-dimensional ultrasound. Hum Reprod 2002;17:950–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adakan S, Yoldemir T, Tavmergen E, Goker E, Killi R. Predictivity of uterine artery, arcuate artery, and intraovarian artery Doppler indices measured on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin injection on pregnancy outcomes. Fertil Steril 2005;84:529–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaprakasan K, Campbell B, Hopkisson J, Johnson I, Raine-Fenning N. A prospective, comparative analysis of anti-Mullerian hormone, inhibin-B, and three-dimensional ultrasound determinants of ovarian reserve in the prediction of poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 2010;93:855–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van der Veen F, Repping S. Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:454–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio C, Rodrigo L, Mir P, et al. Use of array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) for embryo assessment: clinical results. Fertil Steril 2013;99:1044–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio C, Bellver J, Rodrigo L, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening using fluorescence in situ hybridization in patients with repetitive implantation failure and advanced maternal age: two randomized trials. Fertil Steril 2013;99:1400–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez-Mateo C, Colls P, Sanchez-García J, et al. Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil Steril 2011;95:953–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mir P, Rodrigo L, Mercader A, et al. False positive rate of an array CGH platform for single-cell preimplantation genetic screening and subsequent clinical application on day-3. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013;30:143–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobo A, Garrido N, Crespo J, José R, Pellicer A. Accumulation of oocytes: a new strategy for managing low-responder patients. RBM Online 2012;24:424–32
   Google Scholar
• Forman EJ, Li X, Ferry KM, Scott K, Treff NR, Scott RT Jr. Oocyte vitrification does not increase the risk of embryonic aneuploidy or diminish the implantation potential of blastocysts created after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a novel, paired randomized controlled trial using DNA fingerprinting. Fertil Steril 2012;98:644–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobo A, Diaz C. Clinical application of oocyte vitrification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril 2011;96:277–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobo A, de Los Santos MJ, Castello D, Gamiz P, Campos P, Remohí J. Outcomes of vitrified early cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos in a cryopreservation program: evaluation of 3,150 warming cycles. Fertil Steril 2012;98:1138–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto S, Kato N, Saeki K, Morimoto Y. Selection of high-potential embryos by culture in poly(dimethylsiloxane) microwells and time-lapse imaging. Fertil Steril 2012;97:332–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz M, Garrido N, Herrero J, Perez-Cano I, Munoz M, Meseguer M. Timing of cell division in human cleavage-stage embryos is linked with blastocyst formation and quality. Reprod Biomed Online 2012;25:371–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dal Canto M, Coticchio G, Mignini Renzini M, et al. Cleavage kinetics analysis of human embryos predicts development to blastocyst and implantation. Reprod Biomed Online 2012;25:474–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarlatzis BC, Zepiridis L, Grimbizis G, Bontis J. Clinical management of low ovarian response to stimulation for IVF: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2003;9:61–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L, Ferrero S, et al. Management of poor responders in IVF. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;10:235–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoldemir T, Fraser IS. Pregnancy rates in older poor responders who achieve embryo transfer in long down-regulated ART cycles are comparable to those in younger poor responders. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2012;34:459–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lanzone A, Di Simone N, Castellani R, Fulghesu AM, Caruso A, Mancuso S. Human growth hormone enhances progesterone production by human luteal cells in vitro: evidence of a synergistic effect with human chorionic gonadotropin. Fertil Steril 1992;57:92–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palter SF, Tavares AB, Hourvitz A, Veldhuis JD, Adashi EY. Are estrogens of import to primate/human ovarian folliculogenesis? Endocr Rev 2001;22:389–424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami SK, Das T, Chattopadhyay R, et al. A randomized single-blind controlled trial of letrozole as a low-cost IVF protocol in women with poor ovarian response: a preliminary report. Hum Reprod 2004;19:2031–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marci R, Caserta D, Dolo V, Tatone C, Pavan A, Moscarini M. GnRH antagonist in IVF poor-responder patients: results of a randomized trial. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;11:189–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgia F, Sbracia M, Schimberni M, et al. A controlled trial of natural cycle versus microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog flare cycles in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2004;81:1542–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubaldi F, Vaiarelli A, D’Anna R, Rienzi L. Management of poor responders in IVF: is there anything new? BioMed Res Int 2014;2014:352098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato K, Takehara Y, Segawa T, et al. Minimal ovarian stimulation combined with elective single embryo transfer policy: age-specific results of a large, single-centre, Japanese cohort. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2012;10:35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimberni M, Morgia F, Colabianchi J, et al. Natural-cycle in vitro fertilization in poor responder patients: a survey of 500 consecutive cycles. Fertil Steril 2009;92:1297–301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson J, Canning J, Kaneko T, Pru JK, Tilly JL. Germline stem cells and follicular renewal in the postnatal mammalian ovary. Nature 2004;428:145–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White YAR, Woods DC, Takai Y, Ishihara O, Seki H, Tilly JL. Oocyte formation by mitotically active germ cells purified from ovaries of reproductive-age women. Nat Med 2012;18:413–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou K, Yuan Z, Yang Z, et al. Production of offspring from a germline stem cell line derived from neonatal ovaries. Nat Cell Biol 2009;11:631–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods DC, Tilly JL. Oogonial stem cells: a source for autologous germline mitochondria. Reprod Sci 2013;20:7–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentov Y, Esfandiari N, Burstein E, Casper RF. The use of mitochondrial nutrients to improve the outcome of infertility treatment in older patients. Fertil Steril 2010;93:272–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Blerkom J. Mitochondrial function in the human oocyte and embryo and their role in developmental competence. Mitochondrion 2011;11:797–813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aflatoonian A, Eftekhar M, Mohammadian F, Yousefnejad F. Outcome of assisted reproductive technology in women aged 40 years and older. Iranian J Reprod Med 2011;9:281–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar