Learning, coping, adjusting: making school inspections work in Swedish schools

References

• Ball S.J., Maguire M., Braun A. How schools do policy. Policy enactments in secondary schools. 2012; London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter J.A. Professional inspector or inspecting professional? Teachers as inspectors in a new regulatory regime for education in England. Cambridge Journal of Education. 2013; 43(4): 467–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke J. Governing by inspection: Some thoughts and sources. 2010. Unpublished working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke J, Grek S., Lindgren J. Inspections: Governing at a distance. Governing by inspection. 2015; London: Routledge. 11–26.
   Google Scholar
• Dagens Samhälle. Interview with Ann-Marie Begler. 2013. Retrieved from http://www.dagenssamhalle.se/play/blir-skolan-baettre-av-hardare-kontroll-5704.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl M, Jacobsson B. Rituals of inquisition: European Commission monitoring of accessions processes. The European Union and the Baltic States. 2010; London: Routledge. 38–58.
   Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen P. Kvalitetens beskaffenhed [The nature of quality]. 2009; Odense: Syddansk universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen P. The evaluation society. 2012; Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dean M. Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. 1999; London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review. 1983; 48: 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ek E. De granskade. Om hur offentliga verksamheter görs granskningsbara [The auditees. On how public organisations are made auditable]. 2012; Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet, Förvaltningshögskolan.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman R., Sturdy S, Freeman R., Sturdy S. Introduction: Knowledge in policy – Embodied, inscribed, enacted. Knowledge in policy: Embodied, inscribed, enacted. 2014; Bristol: Policy Press. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring J. Case study research. Principles and practices. 2007; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman E. The presentation of self in everyday life. 1959; New York, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Grek S., Lindgren J., Clarke J, Grek S., Lindgren J. Inspection and emotion: The role of affective governing. Governing by inspection. 2015; London: Routledge. 116–136.
   Google Scholar
• Hult A., Segerholm C. Inspection effects through the eyes of the inspectors: Swedish notions. 2012. Paper presented at the European Conference for Educational Research, Network 23 Symposium, “Governing by Inspection (ii): National Developments,” Cádiz, September 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson B. Making sense of Europeanization. Jerusalem Papers in Regulation & Governance. 2010a; Jerusalem: The Hebrew University. Working Paper No. 11, June 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson B. The European Union and the Baltic states. Changing forms of governance. 2010b; London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawn M. Soft governance and the learning spaces of Europe. Comparative European Politics. 2006; 4: 272–288.
   Google Scholar
• Li T. The will to improve. 2007; Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren J. The front and back stage of Swedish school inspection: Opening the black box of judgment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2014; 59(1):58–76. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2013.838803.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren J., Hult A., Segerholm C., Rönnberg L. Mediating school inspection: Key dimensions and key words in the official Swedish discourse 2003–2010. Education Inquiry. 2012; 3(4): 569–590.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe C. On the political. 2005; London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Power M. The audit explosion. 1996a; London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Power M. Making things auditable. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1996b; 21(2): 289–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power M. The audit society. Rituals of verification. 1997; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power M. The risk management of everything rethinking the politics of uncertainty. 2004; London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Power M. Organized uncertainty. Designing a world of risk management. 2007; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rönnberg L. Taking inspection in one's own hands. Local enactments of Swedish national school inspection. 2012. Paper presented at the European Conference of Educational Research (ECER), NW 23: Policy Studies and Politics of Education, Cádiz, Spain, September 17–21, 2012, as a part of the symposium Governing By Inspection (II): National Developments.
   Google Scholar
• Rönnberg L., Lindgren J., Segerholm C. In the public eye: Swedish school inspection and local newspapers: Exploring the audit–media relationship. Journal of Education Policy. 2013; 28(2): 178–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott J.C. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. 1998; New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sowada M., Dedering K. Ermessensspielräume in der Bewertungsarbeit von Schulinspektor/innen [Discretion in the evaluation work of school inspectors]. Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung. 2014. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s35834-014-0091-y.
   Google Scholar
• Teubner G, Baldwin R., Scott C., Hood C. Juridification: Concepts, aspects, limits, solutions. A reader on regulation. 1998; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar