Characterizing Teaching in Introductory Geology Courses: Measuring Classroom Practices

REFERENCES

• Adamson, S.L., Banks, D., Burtch, M., Cox, F., Judson, E., Turley, J.B., Benford, R., and Lawson, A.E. 2003. Reformed undergraduate instruction and its subsequent impact on secondary school teaching practice and student achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 40:939–957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Addy, T.M., and Blanchard, M.R. 2010. The problem with reform from the bottom up: Instructional practices and teacher beliefs of graduate teaching assistants following a reform-minded university teacher certificate programme. International Journal of Science Education , 32:1045–1071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science . 1990. Science for all Americans. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amrein-Beardsley, A., and Popp, S.E.O. 2012. Peer observations among faculty in a college of education: Investigating the summative and formative uses of the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP). Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 24:5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beichner, R.J., Saul, J.M., Abbott, D.S., Morse, J.J., Deardorff, D.L., Allain, R.J., Bonham, S.W., Dancy, M.H., and Risley, J.S. 2007. The student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs (SCALE-UP) project. In Redish, E.F., and Cooney, P.J., eds., Research-based reform of university physics. College Park, MD: American Association of Physics Teachers. Available at http://www.per-central.org/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=4517 (accessed 13 March 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and Walker, D. 1998. Promoting reflection in professional courses: The challenge of context. Studies in Higher Education , 23:191–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling, B., Huether, C.A., Wang, L., Myers, M.F., Markle, G., Dean, G.E., Acra, E.E., Wray, F.P., and Jacob, G.A. 2008. Genetic literacy of undergraduate non-science majors and the impact of introductory biology and genetics courses. Bioscience , 58:654–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R., Donovan, M.S., and Pellegrino, J.W. 2000. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Budd, D.A., van der Hoeven Kraft, K.J., Knight, C., Wirth, K.R., McConnell, D., Bykerk-Kauffman, A., Matheney, R.K., Perkins, D., and Stempien, J.A. 2010. How much non-traditional teaching does it take to dramatically improve learning gains in introductory physical geology? Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs , v. 42, p. 584. Available at https://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2010AM/finalprogram/abstract_181354.htm (accessed 26 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, T., Wolf, P.G., Der, J.P., Packenham, E., and Abd-Hamid, N. 2012. Scientific inquiry in the genetics laboratory: Biologists and university science teacher educators collaborating to increase engagements in science processes. Journal of College Science Teaching , 41:82–89.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie Foundation . 2010. Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Available at http://classifications.carnegiefoundation.org/descriptions/basic.php (accessed 23 May 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L.J. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika , 16:297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, C.H., Fagen, A.P., Callan, J.P., and Mazur, E. 2004. Classroom demonstrations: Learning tools or entertainment? American Journal of Physics , 72:835–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, C.H., and Mazur, E. 2001. Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics , 69:970–977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe, A., Dirks, C., and Wenderoth, M.P. 2008. Biology in BLOOM: Implementing Bloom's taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education , 7:368–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., and Wieman, C. 2011. Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science , 332:862–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebert-May, D., Brewer, C., and Allred, S. 1997. Innovation in large lectures—Teaching for active learning. Bioscience , 47:601–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebert-May, D., Derting, T.L., Hodder, J., Momsen, J.L., Long, T.M., and Jardeleza, S.E. 2011. What we say is not what we do: Effective evaluation of faculty professional development programs. Bioscience , 61:550–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlinger, J., Johnson, K., Banner, M., Dunning, D., and Kruger, J. 2008. Why the unskilled are unaware: Further exploration of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 105:98–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan, I., Campbell, T., and Abd-Hamid, N.H. 2011. The student actions coding sheet (SACS): An instrument for illuminating the shifts toward student-centered science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education , 33:1313–1336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairweather, J. 2009. Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education: A status report for the National Academies National Research Council Board of Science Education (BOSE). Washington, DC: BOSE. Available at http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/Fairweather_CommissionedPaper.pdf (accessed 13 March 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Falconer, K., Wycoff, S., Joshua, M., and Sawada, D. 2001. Effect of reformed courses in physics and physical science on student conceptual understanding. 82nd Annual American Educational Research Association Meeting, Seattle, WA. Available at http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED452083&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED452083 (accessed 19 July 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Flick, L.B., Sadri, P., Morrell, P.D., Wainwright, C., and Schepige, A. 2009. A cross discipline study of reformed teaching by university science and mathematics faculty. School Science and Mathematics Journal , 109:197–211.
   Google Scholar
• George, D., and Mallery, P. 2003. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 11.0 update, 4th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. p. 357.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert L.A., Stempien, J., McConnell, D.A., Budd, D.A., van der Hoeven Kraft, K.J., Bykerk-Kauffman, A., Jones, M.H., Knight, C.C., Matheney, R.K., Perkins, D., and Wirth, K.R. 2012. Not just “rocks for jocks”: Who are introductory geology students and why are they here? Journal of Geoscience Education , 60:360–361.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, K., Steer, D., McConnell, D.A., and Owens, K. 2010. Using a student manipulated model to enhance student learning in a large lecture class. Journal of College Science Teaching , 40:86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Hake, R. 1998. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics , 66:64–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, C., and Dancy, M.H. 2007. Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physics Education Research , 3:020102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, J.K., and Wood, W.B. 2005. Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biology Education , 4:298–310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kortz, K.M., Smay, J.J., and Murray, D.P. 2008. Increasing learning in introductory geoscience courses using lecture tutorials. Journal of Geoscience Education , 56:280–290.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, K.J. 2012. Encouraging students to think about how they learn. In the Trenches , 2:6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kuit, J.A., and Gill, R. 2001. Experiences of reflective teaching. Active Learning in Higher Education , 2:128–142.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, A., Benford, R., Bloom, I., Carlson, M., Falconer, K., Hestenes, D., Judson, E., Piburn, M., Sawada, D., Turley, J., and Wyckoff, S. 2002. Evaluating college science and mathematics instruction. Journal of College Science Teaching , 31:388–393.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, R.H., Manduca, C.A., Mogk, D.W., and Tewksbury, B. 2005. Teaching methods in undergraduate geoscience courses: Results of the 2004 On the Cutting Edge survey of U.S. faculty. Journal of Geoscience Education , 53:237–252.
   Google Scholar
• MacIsaac, D., and Falconer, K. 2002. Reforming physics instruction via RTOP. The Physics Teacher , 40:16–22.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, J.C., Smart, J., Lotter, C., and Sirbu, C. 2011. Comparative analysis of two inquiry observational protocols: Striving to better understand the quality of teacher-facilitated inquiry-based instruction. School Science and Mathematics , 111:306–315.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, S.E., and Delaney, H.D. 2004. Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. p. 868.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, D.A., van der Hoeven Kraft, K. 2011. The affective domain and student learning in the geosciences. Journal of Geoscience Education , 59:106–110.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J. 2009. Evaluation Report of On the Cutting Edge. Available at http://serc.carleton.edu/files/NAGTWorkshops/2009_cutting_edge_evaluation_1265409435.pdf (accessed 3 June 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Morrell, P.D., and Schepige, A.C. 2012. Helping preservice science teachers analyze their practices as we study our own. Self-Studies of Science Teacher Education Practices , 12:157–173.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics . 2000. Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council . 1996. Transforming undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council . 2012. Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver-Hoyo, M.T., Allen, D., Hunt, W.F., Hutson, J., and Pitts, A. 2004. Effects of an active learning environment: Teaching innovations at a research I institution. Journal of Chemical Education , 81:441–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulson, D.R. 1999. Active learning and cooperative learning in the organic chemistry lecture class. Journal of Chemical Education , 76:1136–1140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piburn, M.D., Sawada, D., Falconer, K., Turley, J., Benford, R., and Boom, I. 2000. Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP). Available at http://physicsed.buffalostate.edu/AZTEC/RTOP/RTOP_full/ (accessed 1 October 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Roberson, T.J. 1999. Classroom observation: Issues regarding validity and reliability. Available at http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED427070.pdf (accessed 17 May 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Roehrig, G.H., and Kruse, R.H. 2005. The role of teacher's beliefs and knowledge in the adoption of reform-based curriculum. School Science and Mathematics , 105:412–422.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, J.R.A. 1999. Cronbach's alpha: A tool for assessing the reliability of scales. Journal of Extension , 37:2TOT3. Available at https://cuvpn.colorado.edu/joe/1999april/,DanaInfo=www.joe.org+tt3.php (accessed 24 May 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Sawada, D., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., and Bloom, I. 2002. Measuring reform practices in science and mathematics classrooms: The Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol. School Science and Mathematics , 102:245–252.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., Crippen, K.J., and Hartley, K. 2006. Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education , 36:111–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, C. 2005. Impact of peer interaction on conceptual test performance. American Journal of Physics , 73:446–451.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M.K., Wood, W.B., Adams, W.K., Wieman, C., Knight, J.K., Guild, N., and Su, T.T. 2009. Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science 323:122–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steer, D., McConnell, D.A., Gray, K., Kortz, K., and Liang, X. 2009. Analysis of student responses to peer-instruction conceptual questions answered using and electronic response system: Trends by gender and ethnicity. Science Educator , 18:30–38.
   Google Scholar
• Udovic, D., Morris, D., Dickman, A., Postlethwait, J., and Wetherwax, P. 2002. Workshop biology: Demonstrating the effectiveness of active learning in an introductory biology course. Bioscience , 52:272–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainwright, C., Morrell, P., Flick, L., and Schepige, A. 2004. Observation of reform teaching in undergraduate level mathematics and science courses. School Science and Mathematics , 104:322–335.
   Google Scholar
• Wyckoff, S. 2001. Changing the culture of undergraduate science teaching. Journal of College Science Teaching , 30:306–312.
   Google Scholar
• Yon, M., Burnap, C., and Kohut, G. 2005. Evidence of effective teaching. College Teaching , 50:104–110.
   Google Scholar