Supplemental material
Open access
18,906
Views
176
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Getting to a Post “p<0.05” Era
Expert Knowledge Elicitation: Subjective but Scientific
Anthony O’HaganUniversity of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, United KingdomCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 69-81
|
Received 27 Feb 2018, Accepted 15 Aug 2018, Published online: 20 Mar 2019
Related Research Data
The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis
Source:
Elsevier BV
Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation.
Source:
American Psychological Association (APA)
The Role of Expert Judgment in Statistical Inference and Evidence-Based Decision-Making.
Source:
Informa UK Limited
Kurowicka/Uncertainty Analysis with High Dimensional Dependence Modelling
Source:
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty.
Source:
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”
Source:
Informa UK Limited
Improving expert forecasts in reliability: Application and evidence for structured elicitation protocols
Source:
Wiley
Range-frequency compromise in judgment.
Source:
American Psychological Association (APA)
Semi-quantitative risk assessment of Mediterranean mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis L.) harvesting bans due to harmful algal bloom (HAB) incidents in Greece
Source:
Taylor & Francis
Probabilistic uncertainty specification: Overview, elaboration techniques and their application to a mechanistic model of carbon flux
Source:
Elsevier BV
SHELF: The Sheffield Elicitation Framework
Source:
Springer International Publishing
RePAIR: a power solution to animal experimentation
Source:
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty.
Source:
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
On the performance of social network and likelihood-based expert weighting schemes
Source:
Elsevier BV
Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty.
Source:
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
O'Hagan/Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Experts' Probabilities
Source:
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty.
Source:
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Classical meets modern in the IDEA protocol for structured expert judgement
Source:
Informa UK Limited
Enhancing Statistical Inference in Psychological Research via Prospective and Retrospective Design Analysis
Source:
Unpublished
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.