About this journal
Aims and scope
This journal promotes the use of psychodynamic and systemic perspectives to explore and explain social work practice and relationship-based practice. It publishes papers based on empirical research, theory and practice experience from the UK and around the world, all of which are anonymously reviewed by two peer reviewers. The journal aims to support and enliven practitioners and academics alike through deep and thoughtful exploration of matters relevant to contemporary practice. As the title suggests, social work is a prime focus. However, papers discussing allied fields of interpersonal help and the organisational and policy contexts that influence practice are also welcome, as are articles offering critical analysis of psychodynamic and systemic theory in the light of other explanatory frameworks. Contributions from practitioners are especially welcome, either in the form of full-length articles or as shorter pieces in the Voices from Practice section. The journal embraces social work values and seeks to represent diverse and intercultural perspectives.
The journal aims to provide a forum in which:
• practice, institutional and policy matters are examined through psychodynamic and systemic lenses;
• the lived experience of practitioners, educators and researchers in contemporary helping professions in the UK and in other cultures and countries is reflected and made visible;
• psychodynamic and systemic perspectives are linked to and evaluated in the light of other theoretical orientations.
Group for the Advancement of Psychodynamics and Psychotherapy in Social Work (GAPS), the owner of Journal of Social Work Practice, exists to promote good practice in all social work agencies. GAPS runs conferences, seminars and local groups and is run on a voluntary basis.
For further details and membership enquiries, please contact: Pamela Trevithick, GAPS, Easton Business Centre, Felix Road, Bristol, BS5 0HE.
Peer Review Integrity
All research articles in this journal, including those in special issues, special sections, or supplements, have undergone rigorous peer review, this generally involves initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least two independent reviewers.
Disclaimer
GAPS and our publisher Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in our publications. However, GAPS and our publisher Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by GAPS and our publisher Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. GAPS and our publisher Taylor & Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions.
Journal metrics
Usage
- 194K annual downloads/views
Citation metrics
- 1.2 (2023) Impact Factor
- 1.4 (2023) 5 year IF
- 2.5 (2023) CiteScore (Scopus)
- Q1 CiteScore Best Quartile
- 0.784 (2023) SNIP
- 0.401 (2023) SJR
Speed/acceptance
- 89 days avg. from submission to first decision
- 155 days avg. from submission to first post-review decision
- 13 days avg. from acceptance to online publication
- 28% acceptance rate
Understanding and using journal metrics
Journal metrics can be a useful tool for readers, as well as for authors who are deciding where to submit their next manuscript for publication. However, any one metric only tells a part of the story of a journal’s quality and impact. Each metric has its limitations which means that it should never be considered in isolation, and metrics should be used to support and not replace qualitative review.
We strongly recommend that you always use a number of metrics, alongside other qualitative factors such as a journal’s aims & scope, its readership, and a review of past content published in the journal. In addition, a single article should always be assessed on its own merits and never based on the metrics of the journal it was published in.
For more details, please read the Author Services guide to understanding journal metrics.
Journal metrics in brief
Usage and acceptance rate data above are for the last full calendar year and are updated annually in February. Speed data is updated every six months, based on the prior six months. Citation metrics are updated annually mid-year. Please note that some journals do not display all of the following metrics (find out why).
- Usage: the total number of times articles in the journal were viewed by users of Taylor & Francis Online in the previous calendar year, rounded to the nearest thousand.
Citation Metrics
- Impact Factor*: the average number of citations received by articles published in the journal within a two-year window. Only journals in the Clarivate Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Arts and Humanities Citation Index (AHCI) and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) have an Impact Factor.
- Impact Factor Best Quartile*: the journal’s highest subject category ranking in the Journal Citation Reports. Q1 = 25% of journals with the highest Impact Factors.
- 5 Year Impact Factor*: the average number of citations received by articles in the journal within a five-year window.
- CiteScore (Scopus)†: the average number of citations received by articles in the journal over a four-year period.
- CiteScore Best Quartile†: the journal’s highest CiteScore ranking in a Scopus subject category. Q1 = 25% of journals with the highest CiteScores.
- SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper): the number of citations per paper in the journal, divided by citation potential in the field.
- SJR (Scimago Journal Rank): Average number of (weighted) citations in one year, divided by the number of articles published in the journal in the previous three years.
Speed/acceptance
- From submission to first decision: the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the journal to receive a first decision. Based on manuscripts receiving a first decision in the last six months.
- From submission to first post-review decision: the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the journal to receive a first decision if it is sent out for peer review. Based on manuscripts receiving a post-review first decision in the last six months.
- From acceptance to online publication: the average (median) number of days from acceptance of a manuscript to online publication of the Version of Record. Based on articles published in the last six months.
- Acceptance rate: articles accepted for publication by the journal in the previous calendar year as percentage of all papers receiving a final decision.
For more details on the data above, please read the Author Services guide to understanding journal metrics.
*Copyright: Journal Citation Reports®, Clarivate Analytics
†Copyright: CiteScore™, Scopus
Editorial board
Editors:
Gloria Kirwan - Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Andrew Whittaker - London South Bank University, UK
Book Review Editor:
Nigel Elliott
Editorial Coordinator:
Hannah Linford, UK
GAPS Chair:
Juliet Koprowska
Editorial Advisory Board:
Farrukh Akhtar - Kingston University, UK
Philip Archard - Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust/University of Leicester
Nigel Elliott - UK
Lynn Froggett - University of Central Lancashire, UK
Helen Hingley-Jones - Middlesex University, UK
Juliet Koprowska - University of York, UK
Clare Parkinson - Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust Clinic, UK
Gillian Ruch - University of Sussex, UK
Jenny Simpson - The Faculty of Health, Education and Society (FHES), UK
Laura Steckley - University of Strathclyde
Panel Of Assessors:
Lucille Allain - Middlesex University, UK
Phil Arthrington - University of Leeds, UK
Stewart Collins - Bangor University/Open University, UK
Claire Gregor - University of Reading, UK
Anna Harvey - Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust Clinic, UK
Jane Herd - UK
Stephanie Holt - Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
Richard Ingram - University of Dundee, UK
George Karpetis - University of Adelaide, Australia
Michelle Lefevre - University of Sussex, UK
Barry Luckock - University of Sussex, UK
Philippe Mandin - Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust Clinic, UK
Iain Mcleod - University of Strathclyde, UK
Patricia McNamara - La Trobe University, Australia
Aayesha Mulla - NHS, UK
Martin Smith - UK
Nicky Stanley-Clarke - Massey University, New Zealand
Denise Turner - University of Sussex, UK
Danielle Turney - Bristol University, UK
Vimala Uttakar - St Martin of Tours, UK
Corresponding Editors:
Simon Biggs - University of Melbourne, Australia
Pia Helena Bülow - School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University
Robyn Munford - Massey University, New Zealand
Dongping Qiao - Beijing Normal University, China
Ellen Ramvi - University of Stavanger, Norway
Brian Rasmussen - University of British Columbia Okanagan, Canada
Jackie Sanders - Massey University, New Zealand
Abstracting and indexing
Journal of Social Work Practice is indexed in ASSIA; CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature); Educational Research Abstracts Online; IBSS; OCLC; Periodicals Index Online; Social Care Online (SCIE); Current Contents/Social & Behavioural Sciences; Family Index; Multicultural Education Abstracts; PsycINFO; Research into Higher Education Abstracts; SCOPUS; Social Sciences Citation Index; Social SciSearch; Social Services Abstracts; Special Educational Needs Abstracts; Studies on Women and Gender Abstracts and Sociological Abstracts.
Open access
Journal of Social Work Practice is a hybrid open access journal that is part of our Open Select publishing program, giving you the option to publish open access. Publishing open access means that your article will be free to access online immediately on publication, increasing the visibility, readership, and impact of your research.
Why choose open access?
- Increase the discoverability and readership of your article
- Make an impact and reach new readers, not just those with easy access to a research library
- Freely share your work with anyone, anywhere
- Comply with funding mandates and meet the requirements of your institution, employer or funder
- Rigorous peer review for every open access article
Article Publishing Charges (APC)
If you choose to publish open access in this journal you may be asked to pay an Article Publishing Charge (APC). You may be able to publish your article at no cost to yourself or with a reduced APC if your institution or research funder has an open access agreement or membership with Taylor & Francis.
Use our APC finder to calculate your article publishing charge
News, offers and calls for papers
News and offers
Calls for papers
Society information
Group for the Advancement of Psychodynamics and Psychotherapy in Social Work (GAPS), the owner of Journal of Social Work Practice, exists to promote good practice in all social work agencies. GAPS runs conferences, seminars and local groups and is run on a voluntary basis.
For further details and membership enquiries, please visit the GAPS website.
4 issues per year
Advertising information
Would you like to advertise in Journal of Social Work Practice?
Reach an engaged target audience and position your brand alongside authoritative peer-reviewed research by advertising in Journal of Social Work Practice.
GAPS and our publisher Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in our publications. However, GAPS and our publisher Taylor & Francis, our agents (including the editor, any member of the editorial team or editorial board, and any guest editors), and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by GAPS and our publisher Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. GAPS and our publisher Taylor & Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to, or arising out of the use of the Content. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions .
Ready to submit?
Start a new submission or continue a submission in progress
Go to submission site (link opens in a new window) Instructions for authors